All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads

This paper presents design research conducted as part of a larger project on human-robot interaction. The primary goal of this study was to come to an initial understanding of what features and dimensions of a humanoid robot's face most dramatically contribute to people's perception of its humanness. To answer this question we analyzed 48 robots and conducted surveys to measure people's perception of each robot's humanness. Through our research we found that the presence of certain features, the dimensions of the head, and the total number of facial features heavily influence the perception of humanness in robot heads. This paper presents our findings and initial guidelines for the design of humanoid robot heads.

[1]  S. Kiesler,et al.  “Social” human-computer interaction , 1997 .

[2]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Interface agents: metaphors with character , 1997 .

[3]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[4]  P. Ekman.  Emotion in the human face , 1982 .

[5]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Anthropomorphism: from Eliza to Terminator 2 , 1992, CHI.

[6]  Jasia Reichardt.  Robots: Fact, Fiction and Prediction , 1978 .

[7]  Hao Yan,et al.  More than just a pretty face: affordances of embodiment , 2000, IUI '00.

[8]  E M Critchley,et al.  The human face. , 1985, British medical journal.

[9]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Robot in Society: Friend or Appliance? , 1999 .

[10]  Akikazu Takeuchi,et al.  Situated facial displays: towards social interaction , 1995, CHI '95.

[11]  W. Scott Neal Reilly,et al.  A methodology for building believable social agents , 1997, AGENTS '97.

[12]  Lee Sproull,et al.  When the Interface Is a Face , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Akikazu Takeuchi,et al.  Communicative facial displays as a new conversational modality , 1993, INTERCHI.

[14]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational interface agents , 2000, CACM.

[15]  J. Langlois,et al.  What Is Average and What Is Not Average About Attractive Faces? , 1994 .

[16]  Maureen McGranaghan.  A Human Face , 1998 .

[17]  D. Fox,et al.  Towards Personal Service Robots for the Elderly , 1999 .

[18]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Human values and the design of computer technology , 1997 .

[19]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoeia: computers as social actors , 1993, INTERCHI Adjunct Proceedings.

[20]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  The role of expressiveness and attention in human-robot interaction , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[21]  J. Demiris,et al.  Human-robot-communication and Machine Learning Abbr. Title: Human-robot-communication and Ml , 1997 .

[22]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[23]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Joseph Bates,et al.  The role of emotion in believable agents , 1994, CACM.

[25]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  How to build robots that make friends and influence people , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[26]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Toward Teaching a Robot "Infant" using Emotive Communication Acts , 1999 .