Diagramming a Logic Strategy: Effects on Difficult Problem Types and Transfer

Twenty-five high school learning disabled subjects were randomly assigned to one of two computer-assisted instructional treatments in syllogistic reasoning—one required a deeper level of processing with a diagrammatic response, the other conventional responding. Instructional time was constant across the two groups, yet the subjects who provided diagrammatic responses required fewer trials to reach the mastery criteria. Also, diagramming produced significantly higher posttest and maintenance test scores. Overall, the instruction was effective in (a) producing better-than-chance scores, (b) improving performance on difficult problem types, and (c) teaching learning disabled students to perform complex logical-thinking tasks to a level equivalent to that of high-achieving populations. The deeper level of processing produced differences on more difficult problem types only. Transfer measures showed that students who learned the strategy also creatively modified it to work problems in less formal forms. Variables in the meaningfulness of a strategy to learning disabled students can affect learning.

[1]  D. Carnine,et al.  Elaborated Corrective Feedback and the Acquisition of Reasoning Skills: A Study of Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1987, Exceptional children.

[2]  Syllogistic Reasoning: Generation of Counterexamples. , 1975 .

[3]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Transfer of Cognitive Skills from Programming: When and How? , 1987 .

[4]  Norman Frederiksen,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF COGNITIVE THEORY FOR INSTRUCTION IN PROBLEM SOLVING , 1983 .

[6]  R. Glaser Education and Thinking: The Role of Knowledge. , 1984 .

[7]  Douglas Carnine,et al.  Theory of instruction : principles and applications , 1982 .

[8]  W. Doyle Academic Work , 1983 .

[9]  I. Begg,et al.  Empirical reconciliation of atmosphere and conversion interpretations of syllogistic reasoning errors , 1969 .

[10]  Norman Frederiksen,et al.  Implications of Cognitive Theory for Instruction in Problem Solving , 1984 .

[11]  Paul T. Twohig,et al.  Empirical Status of Feuerstein’s “Instrumental Enrichment” (FIE) Technique as a Method of Teaching Thinking Skills , 1986 .

[12]  D. Johnson,et al.  Atmosphere and conversion errors in syllogistic reasoning. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Diagnostic Models for Procedural Bugs in Basic Mathematical Skills , 1978, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[15]  Harold J. Fletcher,et al.  Improving Conditional Syllogism Performance of Young Normal and Gifted Students with Discovery and Rule Instruction. , 1983 .

[16]  S. B. Sells,et al.  An atmosphere effect in formal syllogistic reasoning. , 1935 .

[17]  Leendert De Leeuw,et al.  Teaching problem solving: An ATI study of the effects of teaching algorithmic and heuristic solution methods , 1983 .

[18]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Repair Theory: A Generative Theory of Bugs in Procedural Skills , 1980, Cogn. Sci..