Integrated, Synchronous Multi-User Design and Analysis

An integrated multi-user system for synchronous design and analysis improves collaboration and concurrent engineering across multiple engineering disciplines. This approach allows all members of a multidisciplinary team (i.e., a team made up of designers and structural analysts) to access the same shared model over a computer network and synchronously contribute to the model in real-time. Data for both design and analysis are directly based on the same mathematical representation of the geometry, eliminating the need for model translation between disciplines. All data are stored on a central server which allows simultaneous access by multiple users. Each user views and operates on the model in a way specific to his or her discipline. Updates to the shared model are seen in real-time. This system enables an enhanced parallel product development workflow, since users from multiple disciplines can simultaneously contribute to the same engineering model. A simple implementation of an integrated multi-user design and analysis system was developed to demonstrate this method. Preliminary results from two experiments suggest a reduction in the amount of time required to perform design and analysis operations when compared with traditional, single-user approaches. Future research is suggested.

[1]  W. Edward Red,et al.  Emerging Design Methods and Tools in Collaborative Product Development , 2013, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[2]  Per Ståle Larsen,et al.  A comparison of accuracy and computational efficiency between the Finite Element Method and the Isogeometric Analysis for two-dimensional Poisson Problems , 2009 .

[3]  Jason F. Shepherd,et al.  An Immersive Topology Environment for Meshing , 2007, IMR.

[4]  Franca Giannini,et al.  Computer Aided Design and Finite Element Simulation Consistency , 2010 .

[5]  Charlie C. L. Wang,et al.  Real-Time Collaborative Design With Heterogeneous CAD Systems Based on Neutral Modeling Commands , 2007, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[6]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[7]  James E. Kelley,et al.  Critical-Path Planning and Scheduling: Mathematical Basis , 1961 .

[8]  James E. Kelley,et al.  Critical-path planning and scheduling , 1899, IRE-AIEE-ACM '59 (Eastern).

[9]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Geometric modeling, isogeometric analysis and the finite cell method , 2012 .

[10]  Willem F. Bronsvoort,et al.  A Collaborative Feature Modeling System , 2002, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[11]  Elena García Barriocanal,et al.  Empirical findings on team size and productivity in software development , 2012, J. Syst. Softw..

[12]  Yongsheng Ma,et al.  Parametric CAD/CAE integration using a common data model , 2011 .

[13]  Thomas Trevor Nysetvold,et al.  Scalable Integration of Commercial File Types in Multi-User CAD , 2014 .

[14]  John A. Evans,et al.  Isogeometric finite element data structures based on Bézier extraction of NURBS , 2011 .

[15]  Jason Nieh,et al.  A Comparison of Thin-Client Computing Architectures , 2000 .

[16]  Kevin Tew,et al.  Automated Conflict Avoidance in Multi-user CAD , 2014 .

[17]  N. K. Shaw,et al.  Steps towards CAD-FEA integration , 1993, Engineering with Computers.

[18]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Volumetric T-spline construction using Boolean operations , 2014, Engineering with Computers.

[19]  Abhishek Agrawal,et al.  CADDAC: Multi-Client Collaborative Shape Design System with Server-based Geometry Kernel , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[20]  L. Cannon How Can NX Advanced Simulation Support Multi-User Design? , 2012 .

[21]  Thomas-Peter Fries,et al.  Boundary Element Analysis with trimmed NURBS and a generalized IGA approach , 2014, ArXiv.

[22]  Giuliano Antoniol,et al.  The Effect of Communication Overhead on Software Maintenance Project Staffing: a Search-Based Approach , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance.

[23]  Les A. Piegl,et al.  The NURBS Book , 1995, Monographs in Visual Communication.

[24]  John A. Evans,et al.  Isogeometric boundary element analysis using unstructured T-splines , 2013 .

[25]  M. Feldman,et al.  The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography , 2011 .

[26]  Sung-Kie Youn,et al.  Isogeometric analysis with trimming technique for problems of arbitrary complex topology , 2010 .

[27]  Hongwei Lin,et al.  Watertight trimmed NURBS , 2008, ACM Trans. Graph..

[28]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis of Structural Vibrations , 2006 .

[29]  Hyun-Jung Kim,et al.  Isogeometric analysis for trimmed CAD surfaces , 2009 .

[30]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  n-Widths, sup–infs, and optimality ratios for the k-version of the isogeometric finite element method , 2009 .

[31]  Edward Red,et al.  Multi-user architectures for computer-aided engineering collaboration , 2011, 2011 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising.

[32]  Ed Red,et al.  A Networking Architecture for a Multi-User FEA Pre-Processor , 2013 .

[33]  Kevin Tew,et al.  Model Consistency and Conflict Resolution With Data Preservation in Multi-User Computer Aided Design , 2014, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[34]  Yue Xu,et al.  ν-CAx: A Research Agenda for Collaborative Computer-Aided Applications , 2010 .

[35]  T. Hughes,et al.  Local refinement of analysis-suitable T-splines , 2012 .

[36]  Ahmad H. Nasri,et al.  T-splines and T-NURCCs , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[37]  Michael A. Scott,et al.  Isogeometric spline forests , 2014 .