University Spin-Offs and Their Impact: Longitudinal Evidence from Italy

The creation of university spin-off companies (USOs) is one of the most visible form of commercialization of university research. To date, there is scant and mixed evidence about USOs and their performance, thus producing a debate about their impact on the economy and society and about the legitimization of policies to support their development. In this paper, we address this gap by providing evidence about the growth strategies and performances of USOs in the Italian context. We analyze the population of nine hundred thirty-five USOs spin-off from Italian public universities since 2000, highlighting potential avenues for future research on this important topic.

[1]  Mike Wright,et al.  The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications , 2005 .

[2]  Riccardo Fini,et al.  Different yokes for different folks: Individual preferences, institutional logics, and the commercialization of academic research , 2010 .

[3]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Incubator firm failure or graduation?: The role of university linkages , 2005 .

[4]  Scott Shane,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[5]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Which Tangible and Intangible Assets Matter for Innovation Speed in Start‐Ups?* , 2007 .

[6]  Riccardo Fini,et al.  Fifteen Years of Academic Entrepreneurship in Italy: Evidence from the Taste Project , 2014 .

[7]  Mike Wright,et al.  The Evolution of Entrepreneurial Competencies: A Longitudinal Study of University Spin‐Off Venture Emergence , 2011 .

[8]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[9]  Nabil Amara,et al.  Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities , 2006 .

[10]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework , 2008 .

[11]  Junfu Zhang,et al.  The performance of university spin-offs: an exploratory analysis using venture capital data , 2009 .

[12]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance , 2006 .

[13]  Riccardo Fini,et al.  Organisational Change and the Institutionalisation of University Patenting Activity in Italy , 2010 .

[14]  Marianna Succurro,et al.  Technology transfer offices and academic spin-off creation: the case of Italy , 2013 .

[15]  Mike Wright,et al.  Entrepreneurial Origin, Technological Knowledge, and the Growth of Spin‐Off Companies , 2011 .

[16]  Chiara Verbano,et al.  Evaluating Performance of University Spin-Off Companies: Lessons from Italy , 2013 .

[17]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  A Comparison of International and Domestic New Ventures , 2003 .

[18]  Riccardo Fini,et al.  Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives , 2009 .

[19]  M. Wright,et al.  University spin-off firms: Lessons from ten years of experience in Europe , 2008 .

[20]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe , 2007 .

[21]  Vangelis Souitaris,et al.  Spinouts from academic institutions: a literature review with suggestions for further research , 2008 .

[22]  H. Lawton Smith,et al.  Measuring the performance of Oxford University, Oxford Brookes University and the government laboratories’ spin-off companies , 2006 .

[23]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  University Research, Intellectual Property Rights and European Innovation Systems , 2005 .

[24]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Overcoming Weak Entrepreneurial Infrastructures for Academic Spin-Off Ventures , 2004 .

[25]  Daniel E. Massing,et al.  AUTM Licensing Survey , 1996 .

[26]  Laura Toschi,et al.  Do venture capitalists have a bias against investment in academic spin-offs? Evidence from the micro- and nanotechnology sector in the UK , 2011 .

[27]  Mike Wright,et al.  The Effectiveness of University Knowledge Spillovers: Performance Differences between University Spinoffs and Corporate Spinoffs , 2011 .

[28]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs , 2007 .

[29]  Michael D. Ensley,et al.  A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups , 2005 .

[30]  D. Pittino,et al.  Founding team composition and early performance of university—Based spin-off companies , 2014 .

[31]  Mike Wright,et al.  Entrepreneurship and University Technology Transfer , 2004 .

[32]  Frédéric Nlemvo,et al.  Toward a Typology of University Spin-offs , 2003 .

[33]  Evila Piva,et al.  The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: an empirical analysis , 2010 .

[34]  J. Wallmark,et al.  Inventions and patents at universities: the case of Chalmers University of Technology , 1997 .

[35]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[36]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[37]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  The Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned, Managerial and Policy Implications, and the Road Forward , 2006 .

[38]  E. Garnsey,et al.  High‐technology clustering through spin‐out and attraction: The Cambridge case , 2005 .

[39]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[40]  Danny P. Soetanto,et al.  Academic spin-offs at different ages: A case study in search of key obstacles to growth , 2009 .

[41]  Scott Shane,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation , 2004 .

[42]  Dirk Czarnitzki,et al.  Exploring the Relationship Between Scientist Human Capital and Firm Performance: The Case of Biomedical Academic Entrepreneurs in the SBIR Program , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[43]  A. Grandi,et al.  Academics' organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas , 2005 .

[44]  S. Zahra,et al.  A Capabilities Perspective on the Effects of Early Internationalization on Firm Survival and Growth , 2006 .

[45]  Hans Löfsten,et al.  Academic versus corporate new technology-based firms in Swedish science parks: an analysis of performance, business networks and financing , 2005 .

[46]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  “Unire i puntini per completare il disegno dell'innovazione” - Undicesimo rapporto Netval sulla valorizzazione della ricerca nelle università italiane. , 2014 .

[47]  M. Wright,et al.  30 Years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship , 2011 .

[48]  Scott Shane,et al.  When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive? , 2003 .

[49]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Institutional change and resource endowments to science-based entrepreneurial firms , 2005 .

[50]  Guido Buenstorf,et al.  Evolution on the Shoulders of Giants: Entrepreneurship and Firm Survival in the German Laser Industry , 2007 .

[51]  Tommy Høyvarde Clausen,et al.  The Impact of Science-Based Entrepreneurial Firms - A Literature Review and Policy Synthesis , 2016 .

[52]  M. Wright,et al.  Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications , 2007 .

[53]  Mike Wright,et al.  Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies , 2004 .

[54]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[55]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model , 2009 .