A Longitudinal Analysis of State Accommodations Policies

State accommodations policies affect the way that students with disabilities are included in large-scale assessments. This articles uses information collected by the National Center on Educational Outcomes to analyze how accommodations policies changed between 1993 and 2005. Throughout the 1990s, state accommodations policies often sought to level the playing field for students with disabilities. In recent years, more emphasis has been placed on seeking to ensure that the accommodations permit valid measurement of test constructs. Accommodations that involve the use of technology and the extended time accommodation are generally better accepted now than in the past. There continues to be no consensus across states about how several accommodations, including calculator, read aloud questions, sign interpret questions, and spell-checker, should be included in the policies, and states may want to consider focusing on the creation of high-quality, universally designed assessments that minimize the need for accommodations.

[1]  M. Thurlow,et al.  Testing Accommodations for Students with Disabilities: A Review of the Literature. Synthesis Report 4. , 1993 .

[2]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  A Compilation of States’ Guidelines for Accommodations in Assessments for Students with Disabilities (NCEO Synthesis Reports) , 1995 .

[3]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  The National Center On Educational Outcomes , 1997 .

[4]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  State Assessment Policies on Participation and Accommodations for Students with Disabilities: 1997 Update. Synthesis Report 29. , 1997 .

[5]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  Students with Disabilities in Large-Scale Assessments , 2000 .

[6]  M. Thurlow,et al.  State Participation and Accommodation Policies for Students with Disabilities: 1999 Update. Synthesis Report 33. , 2000 .

[7]  Sandra J. Thompson,et al.  2001 State Policies on Assessment Participation and Accommodations (NCEO Synthesis Report) , 2002 .

[8]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  Universal Design Applied to Large Scale Assessments (NCEO Synthesis Report) , 2002 .

[9]  S. Bolt,et al.  Five of the Most Frequently Allowed Testing Accommodations in State Policy , 2004 .

[10]  Sandra J. Thompson,et al.  The Role of Accommodations in Educational Accountability Systems. Topical Review Eight. , 2005 .

[11]  Sandra J. Thompson,et al.  State Policies on Assessment Participation and Accommodations for Students with Disabilities , 2005 .

[12]  Stephen G. Sireci,et al.  Test Accommodations for Students With Disabilities: An Analysis of the Interaction Hypothesis , 2005 .

[13]  Alija Kulenović,et al.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[14]  Jason Altman,et al.  A State Guide to the Development of Universally Designed Assessments. , 2006 .

[15]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  Considerations for the Administration of Tests to Special Needs Students: Accommodations, Modifications, and More , 2006 .

[16]  Sandra J. Thompson,et al.  How Students Access Accommodations in Assessment and Instruction: Results of a Survey of Special Education Teachers. EPRRI Issue Brief Seven. , 2006 .

[17]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  A Summary of Research on the Effects of Test Accommodations: 2002 through 2004. Technical Report 45. , 2006 .

[18]  Steven M. Downing,et al.  Handbook of test development , 2006 .

[19]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Effects of Accommodations on High-Stakes Testing for Students with Reading Disabilities , 2006 .

[20]  Laurene L. Christensen,et al.  Hints and Tips for Addressing Accommodations Issues for Peer Review. , 2007 .

[21]  Laurene L. Christensen,et al.  2007 State Policies on Assessment Participation and Accommodations for Students with Disabilities. Synthesis Report 69. , 2008 .

[22]  T. Haladyna,et al.  Content-Related Validity Evidence in Test Development , 2011 .

[23]  C. Hou,et al.  What’s New? , 1991, EcoHealth.