Clinical Impact of Respiratory Motion Correction in Simultaneous PET / MR with a Joint PET / MR Predictive Motion Model

In PET imaging, patient motion due to respiration can lead to artifacts and blurring, in addition to quantification errors. The integration of PET imaging with MRI in PET/MRI scanners provides spatially aligned complementary clinical information and allows the use of high-contrast, high-spatial-resolution MR images to monitor and correct motion-corrupted PET data. On a patient cohort, we tested the ability of our joint PET/MRI-based predictive motion model to correct respiratory motion in PET and show it can improve lesion detectability and quantitation and reduce image artifacts. Methods: Using multiple tracers and multiple organ locations, we applied our motion correction method to 42 clinical PET/MRI patient datasets containing 162 PET-avid lesions. Quantitative changes were calculated using SUV changes in avid lesions. Lesion detectability changes were explored with a study in which 2 radiologists identified lesions in uncorrected and motion-corrected images and provided confidence scores. Results: Mean increases of 12.4% for SUVpeak and 17.6% for SUVmax after motion correction were found. In the detectability study, confidence scores for detecting avid lesions increased, with a rise in mean score from 2.67 to 3.01 (of 4) after motion correction and a rise in detection rate from 74% to 84%. Of 162 confirmed lesions, 49 showed an increase in all 3 metrics—SUVpeak, SUVmax, and combined reader confidence score—whereas only 2 lesions showed a decrease. We also present clinical case studies demonstrating the effect that respiratory motion correction of PET data can have on patient management, with increased numbers of detected lesions, improved lesion sharpness and localization, and reduced attenuation-based artifacts. Conclusion: We demonstrated significant improvements in quantification and detection of PET-avid lesions, with specific case study examples showing where motion correction has the potential to affect diagnosis or patient care.

[1]  Dan J Kadrmas,et al.  Effect of Varying Number of OSEM Subsets on PET Lesion Detectability , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[2]  A. Gjedde,et al.  Noradrenergic Deficits in Parkinson Disease Imaged with 11C-MeNER , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Paul K Marsden,et al.  Impact of respiratory motion correction and spatial resolution on lesion detection in PET: a simulation study based on real MR dynamic data , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  MRI-Based Nonrigid Motion Correction in Simultaneous PET/MRI , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  R. Huesman,et al.  Non-rigid summing of gated PET via optical flow , 1996 .

[7]  G El Fakhri,et al.  Nonrigid PET motion compensation in the lower abdomen using simultaneous tagged-MRI and PET imaging. , 2011, Medical physics.

[8]  M. Casey,et al.  Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[9]  David Atkinson,et al.  Joint PET-MR respiratory motion models for clinical PET motion correction , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  David Atkinson,et al.  Practical PET Respiratory Motion Correction in Clinical PET/MR , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  D. Townsend,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight on PET Tumor Detection , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Michael Brady,et al.  Motion Correction and Attenuation Correction for Respiratory Gated PET Images , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  John F. Hamilton,et al.  A Free Response Approach To The Measurement And Characterization Of Radiographic Observer Performance , 1977, Other Conferences.

[14]  Andriy Myronenko,et al.  Intensity-Based Image Registration by Minimizing Residual Complexity , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  N. Schwenzer,et al.  Respiratory Motion Correction in Oncologic PET Using T1-Weighted MR Imaging on a Simultaneous Whole-Body PET/MR System , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  T Schaeffter,et al.  Thoracic respiratory motion estimation from MRI using a statistical model and a 2-D image navigator , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[17]  R. Lecomte,et al.  Respiratory gating for 3-dimensional PET of the thorax: feasibility and initial results. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Osama Mawlawi,et al.  PET/CT imaging artifacts. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[19]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Dual cardiac–respiratory gated PET: implementation and results from a feasibility study , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  C. Tsoumpas,et al.  STIR: software for tomographic image reconstruction release 2 , 2012, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[21]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  Respiratory motion in positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a review. , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.