Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation.

Using conditions different from conventional medical imaging or laboratory cell lysis, ultrasound has recently been shown to reversibly increase plasma membrane permeability to drugs, proteins and DNA in living cells and animals independently of cell or drug type, suggesting a ubiquitous mechanism of action. To determine the mechanism of these effects, we examined cells exposed to ultrasound by flow cytometry coupled with electron and fluorescence microscopies. The results show that cavitation generated by ultrasound facilitates cellular incorporation of macromolecules up to 28 nm in radius through repairable micron-scale disruptions in the plasma membrane with lifetimes >1 min, which is a period similar to the kinetics of membrane repair after mechanical wounding. Further data suggest that cells actively reseal these holes using a native healing response involving endogenous vesicle-based membrane resealing. In this way, noninvasively focused ultrasound could deliver drugs and genes to targeted tissues, thereby minimizing side effects, lowering drug dosages, and improving efficacy.

[1]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Focused ultrasound (HIFU) induces localized enhancement of reporter gene expression in rabbit carotid artery , 2003, Gene Therapy.

[2]  R. Langer,et al.  Drug delivery and targeting. , 1998, Nature.

[3]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Low-frequency sonophoresis: a review. , 2004, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[4]  E. Unger,et al.  DNA delivery to cells in vivo by ultrasound. , 2004, Methods in molecular biology.

[5]  R. Rapley,et al.  Molecular Biomethods Handbook , 2008, Humana Press.

[6]  T. Reese,et al.  Changes in membrane structure induced by electroporation as revealed by rapid-freezing electron microscopy. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Micromanipulation of endothelial cells: ultrasound-microbubble-cell interaction. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  J. Mcgrath,et al.  Development of a novel microperfusion chamber for determination of cell membrane transport properties. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[9]  J. Weaver,et al.  Theory of electroporation: A review , 1996 .

[10]  Mark R Prausnitz,et al.  Bioeffects caused by changes in acoustic cavitation bubble density and cell concentration: a unified explanation based on cell-to-bubble ratio and blast radius. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  R. Peters,et al.  Permeability of single nuclear pores. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[12]  S. Zimmer,et al.  Transfection of mammalian cells with plasmid DNA by scrape loading and sonication loading. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  C. Ohl,et al.  Detachment and sonoporation of adherent HeLa-cells by shock wave-induced cavitation. , 2003, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[14]  W. Betz,et al.  Monitoring secretory membrane with FM1-43 fluorescence. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  Raffi Bekeredjian,et al.  Use of ultrasound contrast agents for gene or drug delivery in cardiovascular medicine. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  D. Chang,et al.  Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion , 1991 .

[17]  M. Ebara,et al.  Irradiation with ultrasound of low output intensity increased chemosensitivity of subcutaneous solid tumors to an anti-cancer agent. , 2001, Cancer letters.

[18]  J. Dodge,et al.  The preparation and chemical characteristics of hemoglobin-free ghosts of human erythrocytes. , 1963, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[19]  Diane Dalecki,et al.  Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[20]  N. Sharon,et al.  Lectins as cell recognition molecules. , 1989, Science.

[21]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Theory of Electroporation , 1989 .

[22]  Cheri X Deng,et al.  Ultrasound-induced cell membrane porosity. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  G. Bi,et al.  The mechanism of facilitated cell membrane resealing. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[24]  K. Miyake,et al.  Plasma membrane disruption underlies injury of the corneal endothelium by ultrasound. , 1999, Experimental eye research.

[25]  P. Mcneil,et al.  Plasma membrane disruption: repair, prevention, adaptation. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[26]  R. Esenaliev,et al.  Optimal drug and gene delivery in cancer cells by ultrasound-induced cavitation. , 2005, Anticancer research.

[27]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. II. Heterogeneous effects on cells. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Kishan Dholakia,et al.  Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation , 2005 .

[29]  M. Terasaki,et al.  Coping with the inevitable: how cells repair a torn surface membrane , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[30]  T J Flotte,et al.  Alteration of cell membrane by stress waves in vitro. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[31]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[32]  Steven S Vogel,et al.  The endomembrane requirement for cell surface repair , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  P. Smaglik Coping with the inevitable , 2004, Nature.

[34]  R. Rapley,et al.  Molecular Biomethods Handbook , 1998, Humana Press.

[35]  D. Gonzalez-Dunia,et al.  Mechanism of Borna Disease Virus Entry into Cells , 1998, Journal of Virology.

[36]  Victor Frenkel,et al.  Delivery of systemic chemotherapeutic agent to tumors by using focused ultrasound: study in a murine model. , 2005, Radiology.

[37]  T M Jovin,et al.  Fluorescence labeling and microscopy of DNA. , 1989, Methods in cell biology.

[38]  J. Gilloteaux,et al.  Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy aspects of synergistic antitumor activity of vitamin C - vitamin K3 combinations against human prostatic carcinoma cells. , 1995, Scanning microscopy.

[39]  M. Stamnes,et al.  Selective Effects of Calcium Chelators on Anterograde and Retrograde Protein Transport in the Cell* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  T. Svitkina,et al.  Improved procedures for electron microscopic visualization of the cytoskeleton of cultured cells. , 1995, Journal of structural biology.

[41]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Sonoluminescence as an indicator of cell membrane disruption by acoustic cavitation. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[42]  K. Tachibana,et al.  High-resolution scanning electron microscopic evaluation of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound , 2001, Medical Electron Microscopy.

[43]  H. Miller,et al.  Ultrasound inhibits the adhesion and migration of smooth muscle cells in vitro. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[44]  P. Yeagle,et al.  The membranes of cells , 1987 .

[45]  M. Terasaki,et al.  Large Plasma Membrane Disruptions Are Rapidly Resealed by Ca2+-dependent Vesicle–Vesicle Fusion Events , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[46]  J. Weaver,et al.  A quantitative study of electroporation showing a plateau in net molecular transport. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[47]  Richard G. W. Anderson,et al.  Depletion of intracellular potassium arrests coated pit formation and receptor-mediated endocytosis in fibroblasts , 1983, Cell.

[48]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Emerging Technologies in Therapeutic Ultrasound , 2006 .

[49]  Jeffrey C. Bamber,et al.  Physical principles of medical ultrasonics , 2004 .