Preliminary Evidence of “Other-Race Effect”-Like Behavior Induced by Cathodal-tDCS over the Right Occipital Cortex, in the Absence of Overall Effects on Face/Object Processing

Neuromodulation techniques such as tDCS have provided important insight into the neurophysiological mechanisms that mediate cognition. Albeit anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) often enhances cognitive skills, the role of cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) in visual cognition is largely unexplored and inconclusive. Here, in a single-blind, sham-controlled study, we investigated the offline effects of 1.5 mA c-tDCS over the right occipital cortex of 86 participants on four tasks assessing perception and memory of both faces and objects. Results demonstrated that c-tDCS does not overall affect performance on the four tasks. However, post-hoc exploratory analysis on participants' race (Caucasian vs. non-Caucasians), showed a “face-specific” performance decrease (≈10%) in non-Caucasian participants only. This preliminary evidence suggests that c-tDCS can induce “other-race effect (ORE)-like” behavior in non-Caucasian participants that did not show any ORE before stimulation (and in case of sham stimulation). Our results add relevant information about the breadth of cognitive processes and visual stimuli that can be modulated by c-tDCS, about the design of effective neuromodulation protocols, and have important implications for the potential neurophysiological bases of ORE.

[1]  B. Duchaine,et al.  High-Frequency Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Enhances Perception of Facial Identity , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Anodal-tDCS over the human right occipital cortex enhances the perception and memory of both faces and objects , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Oscillatory brain activity and transcranial direct current stimulation in humans , 2004, Neuroreport.

[4]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation over V5 Enhances Visuomotor Coordination by Improving Motion Perception in Humans , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Alexandra Woolgar,et al.  Multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) reveals abnormal fMRI activity in both the “core” and “extended” face network in congenital prosopagnosia , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  Yifeng Zhou,et al.  Electrical Stimulation over Bilateral Occipito-Temporal Regions Reduces N170 in the Right Hemisphere and the Composite Face Effect , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  O. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity. , 1962, Experimental neurology.

[8]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Processes Underlying the Cross-Race Effect: An Investigation of Holistic, Featural, and Relational Processing of Own-Race versus Other-Race Faces , 2010, Perception.

[9]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces , 2004 .

[10]  Sarah E. MacPherson,et al.  Familiar Other-Race Faces Show Normal Holistic Processing and are Robust to Perceptual Stress , 2007, Perception.

[11]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[12]  N. Kanwisher Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  B. Rossion,et al.  The role of experience during childhood in shaping the other-race effect. , 2010, Developmental science.

[14]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  I. Premoli,et al.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Featural and Spacing Processing for Face and Non-face Stimuli , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[16]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[17]  M. Nitsche,et al.  A framework for categorizing electrode montages in transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[18]  A Berardelli,et al.  Ovarian hormones and cortical excitability. An rTMS study in humans , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Cortical Excitability Shifts Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Covert face recognition in congenital prosopagnosia: A group study , 2012, Cortex.

[21]  A. Vercammen,et al.  Anodal tDCS targeting the right orbitofrontal cortex enhances facial expression recognition. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[22]  G. Yovel,et al.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  B. Rockstroh Slow cortical potentials and behavior , 1989 .

[24]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[25]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study , 2004, Cognition.

[26]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Transcranial Electrical Stimulation , 2016, The Neuroscientist.

[27]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Infant attention to same- and other-race faces , 2017, Cognition.

[28]  G. Yovel,et al.  Face ethnicity and measurement reliability affect face recognition performance in developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence from the Cambridge Face Memory Test–Australian , 2011, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[29]  J. Devlin,et al.  Triple Dissociation of Faces, Bodies, and Objects in Extrastriate Cortex , 2009, Current Biology.

[30]  M. Falkmer,et al.  Face Recognition and Visual Search Strategies in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Amending and Extending a Recent Review by Weigelt et al. , 2015, PloS one.

[31]  V. Romei,et al.  Information-Based Approaches of Noninvasive Transcranial Brain Stimulation , 2016, Trends in Neurosciences.

[32]  Jessica L. Irons,et al.  A cultural setting where the other-race effect on face recognition has no social–motivational component and derives entirely from lifetime perceptual experience , 2015, Cognition.

[33]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation targeting the right fusiform gyrus selectively increases working memory for faces , 2017, Brain and Cognition.

[34]  M. Koslowsky,et al.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) – Application in neuropsychology , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  The Occipital Place Area Is Causally and Selectively Involved in Scene Perception , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  C. Miniussi,et al.  The Role of Timing in the Induction of Neuromodulation in Perceptual Learning by Transcranial Electric Stimulation , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[38]  Ary S. Ramoa,et al.  Suppression of Cortical NMDA Receptor Function Prevents Development of Orientation Selectivity in the Primary Visual Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Richard N. A. Henson,et al.  Perception and Conception: Temporal Lobe Activity during Complex Discriminations of Familiar and Novel Faces and Objects , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  S. de Schonen,et al.  Effect of visual experience on face processing: a developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. , 2004, Developmental science.

[41]  Daphne Maurer,et al.  Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces. , 2009, British journal of psychology.

[42]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Development of differential recognition for own- and other-race faces. , 1982, The Journal of psychology.

[43]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Ketamine Dysregulates the Amplitude and Connectivity of High-Frequency Oscillations in Cortical-Subcortical Networks in Humans: Evidence From Resting-State Magnetoencephalography-Recordings. , 2015, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[44]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[45]  Elinor McKone,et al.  Impaired holistic coding of facial expression and facial identity in congenital prosopagnosia , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  B. Duchaine,et al.  The Cambridge Car Memory Test: A task matched in format to the Cambridge Face Memory Test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[47]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[48]  S. Bestmann,et al.  Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Cognitive Neuropsychology Family Resemblance: Ten Family Members with Prosopagnosia and Within-class Object Agnosia , 2022 .

[50]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Deficits in high- (>60 Hz) gamma-band oscillations during visual processing in schizophrenia , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[51]  W. Singer,et al.  Source-Reconstruction of Event-Related Fields Reveals Hyperfunction and Hypofunction of Cortical Circuits in Antipsychotic-Naive, First-Episode Schizophrenia Patients during Mooney Face Processing , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Kang Lee,et al.  Neural correlates of own- and other-race face recognition in children: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2014, NeuroImage.

[53]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[54]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Random Noise Stimulation Improves Neuroplasticity in Perceptual Learning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Effects of training on Japanese face recognition: Reduction of the other-race effect , 1985 .

[57]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[58]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  The roles of gamma-band oscillatory synchrony in human visual cognition. , 2009, Frontiers in bioscience.

[59]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Limited impact of homeostatic plasticity on motor learning in humans , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[61]  Jiangang Liu,et al.  Development of Effective Connectivity during Own- and Other-Race Face Processing: A Granger Causality Analysis , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[62]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  Individual Differences and Long-term Consequences of tDCS-augmented Cognitive Training , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  Mark A. Williams,et al.  An early category-specific neural response for the perception of both places and faces , 2012, Cognitive neuroscience.

[64]  C. Juan,et al.  Individual Differences and State-Dependent Responses in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..