THE ROLE OF SEATBACK AND HEAD RESTRAINT DESIGN PARAMETERS ON REAR IMPACT OCCUPANT DYNAMICS

Although typically classified as AIS 1, whiplash injuries continue to represent a substantial societal problem with associated costs estimated at over $5 billion annually in the US. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effects of seatback and head restraint design parameters on occupant response in rear impact. Rear impact sled tests were conducted using the Hybrid III mid-sized male (50M) dummy seated in a modified production seat, which allowed for the adjustment of recliner stiffness, seatback cushion stiffness, and head restraint height. Instrumentation provided measurements of neck forces and moments, head motion relative to the torso, seatback rotation, and head contact. An on-board digital video camera recorded dummy kinematics. Results from this study indicate that the risk of whiplash injury is not simply related to head restraint position, but is dependent on a combination of factors related to both head restraint and seatback design. For the covering abstract see ITRD E825082.

[1]  Priya Prasad,et al.  Relationships between passenger car seat back strength and occupant injury severity in rear end collisions: field and laboratory studies , 1997 .

[2]  Michael Kleinberger,et al.  Comparison of Three Rotation Measurement Techniques in Rear Impact Application , 2003 .

[3]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[4]  J. Cusick,et al.  Biomechanical analyses of whiplash injuries using an experimental model. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  J B Welcher,et al.  Relationships between seat properties and human subject kinematics in rear impact tests. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  H. Hansson,et al.  A NEW NECK INJURY CRITERION CANDIDATE-BASED ON INJURY FINDINGS IN THE CERVICAL SPINAL GANGLIA AFTER EXPERIMENTAL NECK EXTENSION TRAUMA , 1996 .

[7]  Michael Kleinberger,et al.  EFFECTS OF HEAD RESTRAINT POSITION ON NECK INJURY IN REAR IMPACT , 1999 .

[8]  K. Hayashi,et al.  Motion analysis of cervical vertebrae during whiplash loading. , 1999, Spine.

[9]  A. Wittek,et al.  Cervical injury mechanism based on the analysis of human cervical vertebral motion and head-neck-torso kinematics during low speed rear impacts , 1997 .

[10]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  Neck injuries in car collisions - Injury mechanisms , 2005 .

[11]  G P Siegmund,et al.  The influence of head restraint and occupant factors on peak head/neck kinematics in low-speed rear-end collisions. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  David C. Viano,et al.  Neck Biomechanical Responses with Active Head Restraints: Rear Barrier Tests with BioRID and Sled Tests with Hybrid III , 2002 .

[13]  Peter Niederer,et al.  A NEW NECK INJURY CRITERION CANDIDATE FOR REAR-END COLLISIONS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT SHEAR FORCES AND BENDING MOMENTS , 2001 .