A new geography of preferences for Sub-Saharan African countries in a globalizing trading system

Trade between developing countries, or South-South trade, has been growing rapidly in recent years following significant reductions in tariffs. However, significant barriers remain, and there is currently reluctance among many developing countries to undertake further reductions. In addition African countries and in particular least developed African countries are still marginal players in this reframing of geography of trade. The erosion of preferential access to Northern markets remains their major concern and the status quo in multilateral liberalization could be seen as a desirable scenario. This emphasis on developed countries markets, principally Europe and the US, is likely to represent a missed opportunity for African countries. Unless those countries are granted broader preferences by the European Union and other developed countries, especially in agriculture, significant gains would be obtained from trade preferences provided by other developing countries. To assess this we compare the potential effects of the removal of barriers on trade between African countries and other developing countries with the gains from developed country liberalization. A general equilibrium model containing information on preferential bilateral tariffs is used to estimate the impacts.

[1]  Marco Fugazza Export Performance and its Determinants: Supply and Demand Constraints , 2008 .

[2]  Marco Fugazza,et al.  A South South Survival Strategy: The Potential for Trade Among Developing Countries , 2008 .

[3]  Antoine Bouët,et al.  More or Less Ambition in the Doha Round: Winners and Losers from Trade Liberalisation with a Development Perspective , 2007 .

[4]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Multilateral trade liberalisation and the potential for preference erosion on the EU market , 2006 .

[5]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Aid for Trade , 2017 .

[6]  P. Low,et al.  Multilateral Solutions to the Erosion of Non-Reciprocal Preferences in Nama , 2005 .

[7]  B. Hoekman,et al.  Economic Policy Responses to Preference Erosion: From Trade as Aid to Aid for Trade , 2005 .

[8]  Antoine Bouët,et al.  Is Erosion of Tariff Preferences a Serious Concern , 2005 .

[9]  S. Jean,et al.  Consequences of Alternative Formulas for Agricultural Tariff Cuts , 2005 .

[10]  B. Hoekman,et al.  Trade Preferences and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries: A Selective Survey , 2005 .

[11]  R. Baldwin,et al.  Challenges to Globalization: Analyzing the Economics , 2004 .

[12]  A. Venables,et al.  Geography and Export Performance: External Market Access and Internal Supply Capacity , 2003 .

[13]  Lucian Cernat,et al.  Back to basics : market access issues in the Doha Agenda , 2003 .

[14]  T. Hertel,et al.  Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis: Multi-Region General Equilibrium Modeling , 1997 .