Benchmarking homogenization algorithms for monthly data

The COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) Action ES0601: advances in homogenization methods of climate series: an integrated approach (HOME) has executed a blind intercomparison and validation study for monthly homogenization algorithms. Time series of monthly temperature and precipitation were evaluated because of their importance for climate studies and because they represent two important types of statistics (additive and multiplicative). The algorithms were validated against a realistic benchmark dataset. The benchmark contains real inhomogeneous data as well as simulated data with inserted inhomogeneities. Random independent break-type inhomogeneities with nor- mally distributed breakpoint sizes were added to the simu- lated datasets. To approximate real world conditions, breaks were introduced that occur simultaneously in multiple station series within a simulated network of station data. The sim- ulated time series also contained outliers, missing data peri- ods and local station trends. Further, a stochastic nonlinear global (network-wide) trend was added.

[1]  Susan Elliott Sim,et al.  Using benchmarking to advance research: a challenge to software engineering , 2003, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[2]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change , 2007 .

[3]  Claude N. Williams,et al.  On the reliability of the U.S. surface temperature record , 2010 .

[4]  Robert Lund,et al.  A Review and Comparison of Changepoint Detection Techniques for Climate Data , 2007 .

[5]  Makiko Sato,et al.  A closer look at United States and global surface temperature change , 2001 .

[6]  Taha B. M. J. Ouarda,et al.  Intercomparison of homogenization techniques for precipitation data , 2008 .

[7]  P. Domonkos Efficiency evaluation for detecting inhomogeneities by objective homogenisation methods , 2011 .

[8]  Peter W. Thorne,et al.  How do we tell which estimates of past climate change are correct , 2009 .

[9]  Peter Domonkos,et al.  Benchmarking monthly homogenization algorithms , 2011 .

[10]  M. A. Kohler,et al.  On the Use of Double-Mass Analysis for Testing the Consistency of Meteorological Records and for Making Required Adjustments , 1949 .

[11]  Xiaolan L. Wang,et al.  Accounting for Autocorrelation in Detecting Mean Shifts in Climate Data Series Using the Penalized Maximal t or F Test , 2008 .

[12]  Claude N. Williams,et al.  Detection of Undocumented Changepoints Using Multiple Test Statistics and Composite Reference Series. , 2005 .

[13]  Clemens Simmer,et al.  A Stochastic Iterative Amplitude Adjusted Fourier Transform algorithm with improved accuracy , 2006 .

[14]  Thomas C. Peterson,et al.  The minimization of the screen bias from ancient Western Mediterranean air temperature records: an exploratory statistical analysis , 2011 .

[15]  S. Solomon The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[16]  P. Jones,et al.  Data rescue initiatives: Bringing historical climate data into the 21st century , 2011 .

[17]  Russell S. Vose,et al.  The U.S. Historical Climatology Network Monthly Temperature Data, Version 2 , 2009 .

[18]  P. Thorne,et al.  Benchmarking the performance of pairwise homogenization of surface temperatures in the United States , 2012 .

[19]  Bernard Bobée,et al.  Bayesian change-point analysis in hydrometeorological time series. Part 1. The normal model revisited , 2000 .

[20]  P. Štěpánek,et al.  Data quality control and homogenization of air temperature and precipitation series in the area of the Czech Republic in the period 1961–2007 , 2009 .

[21]  Michele Brunetti,et al.  A new instrumental precipitation dataset for the greater alpine region for the period 1800–2002 , 2005 .

[22]  D. Easterling,et al.  Homogeneity adjustments of in situ atmospheric climate data: a review , 1998 .

[23]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting , 1988 .

[24]  W. Schöner,et al.  Regional temperature variability in the European Alps: 1760–1998 from homogenized instrumental time series , 2001 .

[25]  Michele Brunetti,et al.  Temperature and precipitation variability in Italy in the last two centuries from homogenised instrumental time series , 2006 .

[26]  Peter Domonkos,et al.  Adapted Caussinus-Mestre Algorithm for Networks of Temperature series (ACMANT) , 2011 .

[27]  Schreiber,et al.  Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[28]  Blair Trewin,et al.  Exposure, instrumentation, and observing practice effects on land temperature measurements , 2010 .

[29]  Claude N. Williams,et al.  Description of the COST-HOME monthly benchmark dataset and the submitted homogenized contributions , 2011 .

[30]  Statistical characteristics of detectable inhomogeneities in observed meteorological time series , 2009 .

[31]  T. A. Buishand,et al.  SOME METHODS FOR TESTING THE HOMOGENEITY OF RAINFALL RECORDS , 1982 .

[32]  C. Simmer,et al.  Statistical characteristics of surrogate data based on geophysical measurements , 2006 .

[33]  Thomas C. Peterson,et al.  Assessment of Urban versus Rural in Situ surface temperatures in the contiguous United States: No di , 2003 .

[34]  Nigel P. Fox,et al.  Guiding the Creation of A Comprehensive Surface Temperature Resource for Twenty-First-Century Climate Science , 2011 .

[35]  Anders Moberg,et al.  HOMOGENIZATION OF SWEDISH TEMPERATURE DATA. PART I: HOMOGENEITY TEST FOR LINEAR TRENDS , 1997 .

[36]  Henning W. Rust,et al.  Fewer jumps, less memory: Homogenized temperature records and long memory , 2008 .

[37]  Lucie A. Vincent,et al.  A Technique for the Identification of Inhomogeneities in Canadian Temperature Series , 1998 .

[38]  P. Domonkos,et al.  Newest developments of ACMANT , 2011 .

[39]  M. Begert,et al.  Homogeneous temperature and precipitation series of Switzerland from 1864 to 2000 , 2005 .

[40]  H. Alexandersson A homogeneity test applied to precipitation data , 1986 .

[41]  Thomas C. Peterson,et al.  A new method for detecting undocumented discontinuities in climatological time series , 1995 .

[42]  L. W. Pollak,et al.  Methods in Climatology , 1945, Nature.

[43]  Arthur T. DeGaetano Attributes of Several Methods for Detecting Discontinuities in Mean Temperature Series , 2006 .

[44]  J. M. Craddock,et al.  METHODS OF COMPARING ANNUAL RAINFALL RECORDS FOR CLIMATIC PURPOSES , 1979 .

[45]  Michele Brunetti,et al.  HISTALP—historical instrumental climatological surface time series of the Greater Alpine Region , 2007 .

[46]  Helmut E. Landsberg,et al.  Methods in Climatology , 1945 .

[47]  Henri Caussinus,et al.  Detection and correction of artificial shifts in climate series , 2004 .

[48]  G. Boulet,et al.  Comparison of techniques for detection of discontinuities in temperature series , 2003 .