Recollection Is a Continuous Process

Dual-process theory, which holds that recognition decisions can be based on recollection or familiarity, has long seemed incompatible with signal detection theory, which holds that recognition decisions are based on a singular, continuous memory-strength variable. Formal dual-process models typically regard familiarity as a continuous process (i.e., familiarity comes in degrees), but they construe recollection as a categorical process (i.e., recollection either occurs or does not occur). A continuous process is characterized by a graded relationship between confidence and accuracy, whereas a categorical process is characterized by a binary relationship such that high confidence is associated with high accuracy but all lower degrees of confidence are associated with chance accuracy. Using a source-memory procedure, we found that the relationship between confidence and source-recollection accuracy was graded. Because recollection, like familiarity, is a continuous process, dual-process theory is more compatible with signal detection theory than previously thought.

[1]  R. Clark,et al.  Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[4]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Differential Encoding Mechanisms for Subsequent Associative Recognition and Free Recall , 2012 .

[5]  M. Rugg,et al.  Separating the Brain Regions Involved in Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  U. Rutishauser,et al.  Activity of human hippocampal and amygdala neurons during retrieval of declarative memories , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of recognition memory according to familiarity, recollection, and amount of recollected information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Two Dimensions Are Not Better than One: STREAK and the Univariate Signal Detection Model of Remember/Know Performance. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[9]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Search and decision processes in recognition memory. , 1974 .

[10]  A P Shimamura,et al.  On the recollection of specific- and partial-source information. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[12]  A. Yonelinas Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition , 1973 .

[14]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[15]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  A. Yonelinas Components of episodic memory: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobes: recollection, familiarity, and novelty. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  D. Montaldi,et al.  The neural system that mediates familiarity memory , 2006, Hippocampus.

[19]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: measuring recollection , 1993 .

[20]  J. Wixted Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[21]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[22]  B. Knowlton,et al.  Remembering episodes: a selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Scott D. Slotnick,et al.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[24]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[25]  John T. Wixted,et al.  Remember/Know Judgments Probe Degrees of Recollection , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.