Sparse recovery of the multimodal and dispersive characteristics of Lamb waves.

Guided waves in plates, known as Lamb waves, are characterized by complex, multimodal, and frequency dispersive wave propagation, which distort signals and make their analysis difficult. Estimating these multimodal and dispersive characteristics from experimental data becomes a difficult, underdetermined inverse problem. To accurately and robustly recover these multimodal and dispersive properties, this paper presents a methodology referred to as sparse wavenumber analysis based on sparse recovery methods. By utilizing a general model for Lamb waves, waves propagating in a plate structure, and robust l1 optimization strategies, sparse wavenumber analysis accurately recovers the Lamb wave's frequency-wavenumber representation with a limited number of surface mounted transducers. This is demonstrated with both simulated and experimental data in the presence of multipath reflections. With accurate frequency-wavenumber representations, sparse wavenumber synthesis is then used to accurately remove multipath interference in each measurement and predict the responses between arbitrary points on a plate.

[1]  H. Zou The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties , 2006 .

[2]  J. B. Harley,et al.  Scale transform signal processing for optimal ultrasonic temperature compensation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  P. Cawley,et al.  A two-dimensional Fourier transform method for the measurement of propagating multimode signals , 1991 .

[4]  Xiaoming Huo,et al.  Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Albert Wang,et al.  The In-Crowd Algorithm for Fast Basis Pursuit Denoising , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Introduction to Compressed Sensing , 2022 .

[7]  Michael Elad,et al.  Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Holger Rauhut,et al.  Random Sampling of Sparse Trigonometric Polynomials, II. Orthogonal Matching Pursuit versus Basis Pursuit , 2008, Found. Comput. Math..

[9]  Ajay Raghavan,et al.  Guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2007 .

[10]  Kazuro Kageyama,et al.  Dispersion analysis of Lamb waves and damage detection for aluminum structures using ridge in the time-scale domain , 2009 .

[11]  Jared Tanner,et al.  Decay Properties of Restricted Isometry Constants , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[12]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Strategies for guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[14]  E. Candès The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing , 2008 .

[15]  Jennifer E. Michaels,et al.  Multi-mode and multi-frequency guided wave imaging via chirp excitations , 2011, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[16]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso , 2006, math/0608017.

[17]  Jochen Moll,et al.  Efficient temperature compensation strategies for guided wave structural health monitoring. , 2010, Ultrasonics.

[18]  Niethammer,et al.  Time-frequency representation of Lamb waves using the reassigned spectrogram , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Michael P. Friedlander,et al.  Probing the Pareto Frontier for Basis Pursuit Solutions , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[20]  Barry T. Smith,et al.  Time-frequency analysis of the dispersion of Lamb modes. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Ivan Zorych,et al.  Particle filtering for dispersion curve tracking in ocean acoustics. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J. Michaels Detection, localization and characterization of damage in plates with an in situ array of spatially distributed ultrasonic sensors , 2008 .

[23]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[24]  Christ Glorieux,et al.  Laser ultrasonic study of Lamb waves: determination of the thickness and velocities of a thin plate , 2003 .

[25]  P.D. Wilcox,et al.  A rapid signal processing technique to remove the effect of dispersion from guided wave signals , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[26]  Xinlin Qing,et al.  Effect of adhesive on the performance of piezoelectric elements used to monitor structural health , 2006 .

[27]  J. Claerbout,et al.  Robust Modeling With Erratic Data , 1973 .

[28]  Richard L. Weaver,et al.  Temperature dependence of diffuse field phase , 1999, Ultrasonics.

[29]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[30]  A. Raghavan,et al.  Guided-wave signal processing using chirplet matching pursuits and mode correlation for structural health monitoring , 2007 .

[31]  James S. Hall,et al.  A model-based approach to dispersion and parameter estimation for ultrasonic guided waves. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  James S. Hall,et al.  Model-based parameter estimation for characterizing wave propagation in a homogeneous medium , 2011 .