Business Process Configuration in the Cloud: How to Support and Analyze Multi-tenant Processes?

Lion's share of cloud research has been focusing on performance related problems. However, cloud computing will also change the way in which business processes are managed and supported, e.g., more and more organizations will be sharing common processes. In the classical setting, where product software is used, different organizations can make ad-hoc customizations to let the system fit their needs. This is undesirable, especially when multiple organizations share a cloud infrastructure. Configurable process models enable the sharing of common processes among different organizations in a controlled manner. This paper discusses challenges and opportunities related to business process configuration. Causal nets (C-nets) are proposed as a new formalism to deal with these challenges, e.g., merging variants into a configurable model is supported by a simple union operator. C-nets also provide a good representational bias for process mining, i.e., process discovery and conformance checking based on event logs. In the context of cloud computing, we focus on the application of C-nets to cross-organizational process mining.

[1]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst Configurable Services in the Cloud: Supporting Variability While Enabling Cross-Organizational Process Mining , 2010, OTM Conferences.

[2]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Process Mining - Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes , 2011 .

[3]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Do Petri Nets Provide the Right Representational Bias for Process Mining? , 2011, ART @ Petri Nets.

[4]  Boudewijn F. van Dongen,et al.  Causal Nets: A Modeling Language Tailored towards Process Discovery , 2011, CONCUR.

[5]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Configurable Process Models: Experiences from a Municipality Case Study , 2009, CAiSE.

[6]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Correctness Ensuring Process Configuration: An Approach Based on Partner Synthesis , 2010, BPM.

[7]  Iris Reinhartz-Berger,et al.  Extending the Adaptability of Reference Models , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[8]  Wil M.P. van der Aalst,et al.  Configurable Process Models — A Foundational Approach , 2007 .

[9]  Boudewijn F. van Dongen,et al.  Towards Cross-Organizational Process Mining in Collections of Process Models and Their Executions , 2011, Business Process Management Workshops.

[10]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Capturing variability in business process models: the Provop approach , 2010 .

[11]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Configurable Workflow Models , 2008, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[12]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Preserving correctness during business process model configuration , 2010, Formal Aspects of Computing.

[13]  Patrick Delfmann,et al.  Adaptive Reference Modeling: Integrating Configurative and Generic Adaptation Techniques for Information Models , 2007 .

[14]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior , 2008, Inf. Syst..

[15]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Inheritance of workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change , 2002 .

[16]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  A configurable reference modelling language , 2007, Inf. Syst..