Cutaneous homeostasis and epidermal barrier function in a young healthy Caucasian population

Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum hydration (SCH), and skin surface pH are indicators of skin barrier integrity. There is scant evidence on normative data for cutaneous homeostasis parameters in healthy individuals. To develop normative data for skin erythema, melanin, pH, SCH, and TEWL; identify differences in these variables among different anatomical locations; and explore factors that may modify these values. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 87 healthy volunteers (34 males) aged 20 to 40 years. TEWL, SCH, pH, erythema, and melanin were measured on the cheeks, volar forearms, and palms. The lowest TEWL value corresponded to volar forearms (9.69 ± 2.94 g m−2·h−1) and the highest to palms (49.32 ± 14.55 g m−2·h−1). Erythema was more evident on cheeks than palms or volar forearms (413.51 arbitruary units [AU] vs. 259.98 AU vs. 252.02 AU). The lowest melanin index was documented for palms (92.72 ± 41.70 AU). pH levels were similar among the different locations. The erythema index was significantly higher in males versus females for all locations. Linear regression analysis adjusted for age and SCH revealed an increase in 0.45 ± 0.18 g m−2·h−1 for TEWL on the cheek and 0.32 ± 0.10 g m−2·h−1 for TEWL on the forearm for each one-year increase in age. We provide normative data for individuals aged 20–40 years, across three anatomical locations, and propose a predictive model for TEWL on the cheek and forearm as a function of age and SCH

[1]  Hua Zhao,et al.  Mapping the face of young population in China: Influence of anatomical sites and gender on biophysical properties of facial skin , 2019, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[2]  M. Peppelman,et al.  Anatomical site variation of water content in human skin measured by the Epsilon: A pilot study , 2019, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[3]  C. Flohr,et al.  Research Techniques Made Simple: Transepidermal Water Loss Measurement as a Research Tool. , 2018, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[4]  Sun Young Park,et al.  Age‐related changes in lip morphological and physiological characteristics in Korean women , 2018, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[5]  A. Mosam,et al.  Epidermal barrier function in healthy black South African infants compared with adults , 2018, Pediatric dermatology.

[6]  J. Kottner,et al.  Transepidermal water loss in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis update , 2018, The British journal of dermatology.

[7]  I. Dolečková,et al.  A comprehensive in vivo study of Caucasian facial skin parameters on 442 women , 2018, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[8]  A. Firooz,et al.  Effects of four soaps on skin trans‐epidermal water loss and erythema index , 2018, Journal of cosmetic dermatology.

[9]  M. Man,et al.  Validation of GPSkin Barrier® for assessing epidermal permeability barrier function and stratum corneum hydration in humans , 2018, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[10]  B. Diffey,et al.  Melanin distribution in human epidermis affords localized protection against DNA photodamage and concurs with skin cancer incidence difference in extreme phototypes , 2018, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[11]  H. Rotsztejn,et al.  Evaluation of the relation between lipid coat, transepidermal water loss, and skin pH , 2017, International journal of dermatology.

[12]  B. Nedelec,et al.  Skin characteristics: normative data for elasticity, erythema, melanin, and thickness at 16 different anatomical locations , 2016, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[13]  D. Greenhalgh A Primer on Pigmentation , 2015, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[14]  Á. Hernández-Martín,et al.  The role of filaggrin in the skin barrier and disease development. , 2015, Actas dermo-sifiliograficas.

[15]  Maria L. Wei,et al.  BASIS FOR ENHANCED BARRIER FUNCTION OF PIGMENTED SKIN , 2014, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[16]  Aleksandr Stefaniak,et al.  International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non‐clinical settings: Part 2. transepidermal water loss and skin hydration , 2013, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[17]  K. Feingold,et al.  Regulation of permeability barrier homeostasis. , 2012, Clinics in dermatology.

[18]  J. Fluhr,et al.  Influence of skin type, race, sex, and anatomic location on epidermal barrier function. , 2012, Clinics in dermatology.

[19]  H. Maibach,et al.  Mapping the human face: biophysical properties , 2010, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[20]  Kenneth R Feingold,et al.  pH-regulated mechanisms account for pigment-type differences in epidermal barrier function. , 2009, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[21]  H. Tagami,et al.  Location‐related differences in structure and function of the stratum corneum with special emphasis on those of the facial skin , 2008, International journal of cosmetic science.

[22]  D. Basketter,et al.  Skin Irritation and Sensitization: Mechanisms and New Approaches for Risk Assessment , 2008, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[23]  H. Wulf,et al.  Assessment of atopic eczema: clinical scoring and noninvasive measurements , 2007, The British journal of dermatology.

[24]  K. Ghosh,et al.  Tissue engineering for cutaneous wounds. , 2007, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[25]  P. Elias,et al.  Interactions among stratum corneum defensive functions , 2005, Experimental dermatology.

[26]  P. Matts,et al.  Stratum corneum moisturization at the molecular level: an update in relation to the dry skin cycle. , 2005, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[27]  Kenneth R Feingold,et al.  pH directly regulates epidermal permeability barrier homeostasis, and stratum corneum integrity/cohesion. , 2003, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[28]  H. Tagami,et al.  Number of cell layers of the stratum corneum in normal skin – relationship to the anatomical location on the body, age, sex and physical parameters , 1999, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[29]  R H Guy,et al.  Homogeneous transport in a heterogeneous membrane: water diffusion across human stratum corneum in vivo. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[30]  G. Plewig,et al.  Regional differences of cell sizes in the human stratum corneum. I. , 1970, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[31]  P. Jaén,et al.  Nuevos modelos experimentales para el estudio de la homeostasis y la enfermedad cutánea , 2015 .

[32]  A. Giménez-Arnau,et al.  [Xerosis: a dysfunction of the epidermal barrier]. , 2008, Actas dermo-sifiliograficas.