Auditing and the production of legitimacy

Abstract This essay discusses an important series of formative contributions to contextualist and critical research in auditing. A small number of relatively recent papers question rationalized accounts of the audit process and explore the complex ‘back stage’ of practice. These papers are interpreted as contributions to our understanding of the production of legitimacy around four substantive themes: the audit process and formal structure; auditing as a business; working papers and image management; new audits. The papers also point to the socially constructed nature of professional inference and suggest a fruitful basis for taking these research efforts forward.

[1]  D. Bloor,et al.  Knowledge and Social Imagery , 1977 .

[2]  H. Willmott.  Organising the profession: A theoretical and historical examination of the development of the major accountancy bodies in the U.K.☆ , 1986 .

[3]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  Sampling and the abstraction of knowledge in the auditing profession: An extended institutional theory perspective , 1993 .

[4]  M. Power.  FROM COMMON SENSE TO EXPERTISE: REFLECTIONS ON THE PREHISTORY OF AUDIT SAMPLING. , 1992 .

[5]  K. Jeppesen.  Reinventing auditing, redefining consulting and independence , 1998 .

[6]  J. Bedard,et al.  Academic Auditing Research: An Exploratory Investigation into its Usefulness , 2001 .

[7]  Michael Power,et al.  Auditing, Expertise and the Sociology of Technique , 1995 .

[8]  Vaughan S. Radcliffe.  Knowing efficiency: the enactment of efficiency in efficiency auditing , 1999 .

[9]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[10]  C. Humphrey.  Audit research—looking beyond North America , 2001 .

[11]  B. Pentland,et al.  Audit the taxpayer, not the return: Tax auditing as an expression game , 1996 .

[12]  R. Bies,et al.  The Legalistic organization , 1994 .

[13]  M. Power.  The politics of financial auditing , 1993 .

[14]  M. Power.  The Audit Explosion , 1994 .

[15]  M. Power.  Expertise and the construction of relevance: Accountants and environmental audit , 1997 .

[16]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Getting comfortable with the numbers: Auditing and the micro-production of macro-order , 1993 .

[17]  R. Collins.  On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  M. Oliverio.  Internal control—integrated framework: who is responsible? , 2001 .

[19]  Mark E. Haskins,et al.  Inherent risk assessment and audit firm technology: A contrast in world theories , 1991 .

[20]  Michael Power,et al.  Making things auditable , 1996 .

[21]  Jere R. Francis.  Auditing, hermeneutics, and subjectivity , 1994 .

[22]  M. J. Fischer,et al.  "Real-izing" the benefits of new technologies as a source of audit evidence: An interpretive field study , 1996 .

[23]  M. Power.  The audit society : rituals of verification , 1999 .

[24]  Timothy B. Bell,et al.  Auditing organizations through a strategic-systems lens : the KPMG Business Measurement Process , 1997 .

[25]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice by H. M. Collins (review) , 1988, Technology and Culture.

[26]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  Materiality judgments and audit firm culture: Social-behavioral and political perspectives , 1994 .

[27]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Will auditors take over the world? Program, technique and the verification of everything , 2000 .

[28]  T. Fogarty.  The imagery and reality of peer review in the U.S.: Insights from institutional theory , 1996 .

[29]  C. McNair.  Proper compromises: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior☆ , 1991 .

[30]  C. Humphrey,et al.  From techniques to ideologies: An alternative perspective on the audit function , 1990 .

[31]  Vaughan S. Radcliffe.  Efficiency Audit: An Assembly of Rationalities and Programmes , 1998 .

[32]  H. Willmott,et al.  The power of "independence": defending and extending the jurisdiction of accounting in the United Kingdom , 1995 .