Profitability performance assessment in the Australian construction industry: a global relational two-stage DEA method

Effective performance measurement drives performance and supports the development of construction. Only minimal literature measuring construction performance, efficiency and effectiveness simultaneously can be identified. A global relational two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) method is here proposed in order to produce effective and informative performance results. A relational two-stage DEA method systematically measures overall efficiency for a whole construction system and also yields scores for the individual stages of construction. The DEA results can be directly compared through global benchmark technology. The Australian construction industry is employed in order to implement the new method, in which profitability performance as a vital indicator of business survival, and its two dimensions of efficiency and effectiveness, are measured. The construction profitability performance and efficiency measures obtained provide evidence of underperformance and a slight imbalance in Australia between 1991 and 2012, while the measures obtained for the effectiveness factor indicate better achievement. The approach here developed promotes progress in modelling two-stage performance measurement and it can be replicated worldwide by construction projects, organizations or industries in order to quantify their performance, identify internal inefficiency components and recognize competitive advantages for promoting sustainable development.

[1]  Dennis Trewin,et al.  Year book Australia , 1979 .

[2]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis , 1984, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  Katsuhiko Kokubu,et al.  Factors Influencing Corporate Environmental Protection Activities for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions: The Relationship Between Environmental and Financial Performance , 2012 .

[4]  Todd T. Milbourn,et al.  The Search for the Best Financial Performance Measure , 1997 .

[5]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[6]  Xiaolong Xue,et al.  Measuring the Productivity of the Construction Industry in China by Using DEA-Based Malmquist Productivity Indices , 2008 .

[7]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  An alternative DEA measure: a case of OECD countries , 2003 .

[8]  R. Färe,et al.  Malmquist Productivity Indexes and DEA , 2011 .

[9]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Building a conceptual framework for measuring business performance in construction: an empirical evaluation , 2005 .

[10]  Makarand Hastak,et al.  Protocol for Profitability Analysis Using Internal Entities in Organizational Structure of Construction Companies , 2012 .

[11]  Bo Wang,et al.  Environmental efficiency evaluation of industry in China based on a new fixed sum undesirable output data envelopment analysis , 2014 .

[12]  Yosef Jabareen,et al.  Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure , 2009 .

[13]  Chia-Chi Sun,et al.  Evaluating and benchmarking productive performances of six industries in Taiwan Hsin Chu Industrial Science Park , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Arthur J. Fox.  Productivity in the Construction Industry , 1978 .

[15]  Yinghua Shen,et al.  A total factor productivity measure for the construction industry and analysis of its spatial difference: a case study in China , 2013 .

[16]  Hedley Smyth,et al.  A Critical Review of Performance Measurement in Construction , 2012 .

[17]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[18]  Giulio Bottazzi,et al.  Productivity, profitability and financial performance , 2008 .

[19]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Chien-Liang Lin,et al.  Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Example of the Building Administration Authorities in Taiwan , 2014 .

[21]  Jorge Moreira da Costa,et al.  Performance Assessment of Construction Companies Integrating Key Performance Indicators and Data Envelopment Analysis , 2010 .

[22]  J. Cummins,et al.  Comparison of Frontier Efficiency Methods: An Application to the U.S. Life Insurance Industry , 1998 .

[23]  Mohamed Abdel-Wahab,et al.  Measuring the Construction Industry’s Productivity Performance: Critique of International Productivity Comparisons at Industry Level , 2015 .

[24]  Khalied Hyari,et al.  Utilizing data envelopment analysis to benchmark safety performance of construction contractors , 2010 .

[25]  M. BacidoreJeffrey,et al.  The Search for the Best Financial Performance Measure , 1997 .

[26]  Nick B. Ganaway.  Construction Business Management , 2006 .

[27]  J. Pastor,et al.  A global Malmquist productivity index , 2005 .

[28]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects☆ , 1995 .

[29]  R. Edward Minchin,et al.  Management of Construction Firm Performance Using Benchmarking , 2007 .

[30]  Ioannis E. Tsolas,et al.  Modeling Profitability and Stock Market Performance of Listed Construction Firms on the Athens Exchange: Two-Stage DEA Approach , 2013 .

[31]  José Luis Zofío,et al.  Network DEA efficiency in input-output models: With an application to OECD countries , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Yi Sheng Liu,et al.  Market Structure, Ownership Structure, and Performance of China's Construction Industry , 2013 .

[33]  Chunlu Liu,et al.  Malmquist indices of total factor productivity changes in the Australian construction industry , 2010 .

[34]  Qing Zhang,et al.  A dynamic stochastic frontier model to evaluate regional financial efficiency: Evidence from Chinese county-level panel data , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Peter Zoeteweij,et al.  An Analysis of Arithmetic Constraints on Integer Intervals , 2007, Constraints.

[36]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Network data envelopment analysis: A review , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  I. Tsolas.  Modelling profitability and effectiveness of Greek-listed construction firms: an integrated DEA and ratio analysis , 2011 .

[38]  Hedley Smyth,et al.  Nature of Firm Performance in Construction , 2014 .

[39]  Riaan Fischer.  PRODUCTIVITY IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY , 2010 .

[40]  Victoria Shestalova,et al.  Sequential Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth: An Application to OECD Industrial Activities , 2003 .

[41]  G. Johnes,et al.  Performance trends in the construction industry worldwide: an overview of the turn of the century , 2013 .

[42]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective , 2010 .

[43]  Lawrence W. Lan,et al.  A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for non-storable commodities: Integrated data envelopment analysis approaches , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Joe Zhu,et al.  A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Cletus C. Agu,et al.  ANALYSIS OF THE DETERMINANTS OF THE NIGERIAN BANKING SYSTEM's PROFITS AND PROFITABILITY PERFORMANCE , 2016 .

[46]  Tracy N. Y. Choi,et al.  Determinants of Efficiency of Contractors in Hong Kong and China: Panel Data Model Analysis , 2013 .

[47]  J. E. Manser.  Economics: A Foundation Course for the Built Environment , 1994 .

[48]  Simon M. Hsiang,et al.  From Social Network to Data Envelopment Analysis: Identifying Benchmarks at the Site Management Level , 2014 .