Psychophysical laws as reflection of mental space properties.

The paper is devoted to the relationship between psychophysics and physics of mind. The basic trends in psychophysics development are briefly discussed with special attention focused on Teghtsoonian's hypotheses. These hypotheses pose the concept of the universality of inner psychophysics and enable us to speak about psychological space as an individual object with its own properties. Turning to the two-component description of human behavior I. Lubashevsky (2017) [9] the notion of mental space is formulated and human perception of external stimuli is treated as the emergence of the corresponding images in the mental space. On one hand, these images are caused by external stimuli and their magnitude bears the information about the intensity of the corresponding stimuli. On the other hand, the individual structure of such images as well as their persistence after emergence is determined only by the properties of mental space on its own. Finally, the mental operations of image comparison and their scaling are defined in a way allowing for the bounded capacity of human cognition. As demonstrated, the developed theory of stimulus perception is able to explain the basic regularities of psychophysics, e.g., (i) the regression and range effects leading to the overestimation of weak stimuli and the underestimation of strong stimuli, (ii) scalar variability (Weber's and Ekman' laws), and (iii) the sequential (memory) effects. As the final result, a solution to the Fechner-Stevens dilemma is proposed. This solution posits that Fechner's logarithmic law is not a consequences of Weber's law but stems from the interplay of uncertainty in evaluating stimulus intensities and the multi-step scaling required to overcome the stimulus incommensurability.

[1]  J. Guilford.  A generalized psychophysical law. , 1932 .

[2]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Comment on "Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures" , 2009, Science.

[3]  Analogs in Luce's global psychophysical theory of Stevens's psychophysical regression effect. , 2013, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Regression effect in psychophysical judgment , 1966 .

[5]  E. Galanter,et al.  Psychophysical Scaling ' " , 2006 .

[6]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Psychology of Perception , 1957 .

[7]  Kenneth H. Norwich,et al.  Information, sensation, and perception , 1993 .

[8]  Bodo Winter,et al.  Mental number space in three dimensions , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[9]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  Resolving social conflicts : selected papers on group dynamics , 1948 .

[10]  Psychophysics without physics: extension of Fechnerian scaling from continuous to discrete and discrete-continuous stimulus spaces , 2005 .

[11]  J. Baird.  Sensation and Judgment: Complementarity Theory of Psychophysics , 1996 .

[12]  P. Schilder,et al.  The Conceptual Representation and the Measurement of Psychological Forces , 1940 .

[13]  P. Lazarsfeld.  Principles of Topological Psychology , 1938 .

[14]  D. M. MacKay,et al.  Psychophysics of Perceived Intensity: A Theoretical Basis for Fechner's and Stevens' Laws , 1963, Science.

[15]  A. Jones.  Phenomenology , 2014 .

[16]  M. Cook,et al.  The Power Law as a Special Case of Fechner's Law , 1967, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  K. Norwich.  Physical Entropy And The Senses , 2005, Acta biotheoretica.

[18]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Exemplar-Based Random-Walk Model 1 An Exemplar-Based Random-Walk Model of Categorization and Recognition , 2015 .

[19]  Brett K. Hayes,et al.  Memory, reasoning, and categorization: parallels and common mechanisms , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[20]  Thomas Karlsson,et al.  Magnitude Processing in the Brain: An fMRI Study of Time, Space, and Numerosity as a Shared Cortical System , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  G. Kelly,et al.  The Psychology Of Personal Constructs Volume One A Theory Of Personality , 2011 .

[22]  Mauro Copelli,et al.  Physics of psychophysics: Stevens and Weber-Fechner laws are transfer functions of excitable media. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  The Continuity Of Mind , 2008 .

[24]  H. Colonius,et al.  Psychophysics without physics: a purely psychological theory of Fechnerian scaling in continuous stimulus spaces , 2005 .

[25]  D. Luce,et al.  Detection and Recognition " ' , 2006 .

[26]  E. Poulton.  The new psychophysics: Six models for magnitude estimation. , 1968 .

[27]  Michel Treisman,et al.  Sensory Scaling and the Psychophysical Law , 1964 .

[28]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  Activation in the neural network responsible for categorization and recognition reflects parameter changes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  L. Perlovsky.  Toward physics of the mind: Concepts, emotions, consciousness, and symbols , 2006 .

[30]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  Processing magnitudes within the parietal cortex , 2012 .

[31]  D. Cross,et al.  Sequential dependencies and regression in psychophysical judgments , 1973 .

[32]  P. Anderson.  More is different. , 1972, Science.

[33]  Neil Stewart,et al.  The effect of interstimulus interval on sequential effects in absolute identification , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  L. Narens.  Theories of Meaningfulness , 2001 .

[35]  Leonid Perlovsky,et al.  Physics of mind: Experimental confirmations of theoretical predictions. , 2018, Physics of life reviews.

[36]  R. Luce,et al.  On the possible psychophysical laws. , 1959, Psychological review.

[37]  K. Sakai,et al.  Autonomous Mechanism of Internal Choice Estimate Underlies Decision Inertia , 2014, Neuron.

[38]  R. Shepard.  Stimulus and response generalization: tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  V. Billock,et al.  To honor Fechner and obey Stevens: relationships between psychophysical and neural nonlinearities. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Jozef J. Zwislocki.  Sensory Neuroscience: Four Laws of Psychophysics , 2008 .

[41]  Louis Narens,et al.  A theory of ratio magnitude estimation , 1996 .

[42]  Thomas A. Carlson,et al.  Neural Decoding and “Inner” Psychophysics: A Distance-to-Bound Approach for Linking Mind, Brain, and Behavior , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[43]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The dynamics of scaling: a memory-based anchor model of category rating and absolute identification. , 2005, Psychological review.

[44]  Anja Podlesek,et al.  Sequential effects are not trivial context effects in psychophysical research. , 2010 .

[45]  E. Poulton.  Population norms of top sensory magnitudes and S. S. Stevens’ exponents , 1967 .

[46]  J. A. Scott Kelso,et al.  The Dynamic Brain in Action: Coordinative Structures, Criticality, and Coordination Dynamics , 2014 .

[47]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[48]  R. Nosofsky.  Similarity Scaling and Cognitive Process Models , 1992 .

[49]  G. Rabin,et al.  Physicalism , 2011 .

[50]  Włodzisław Duch,et al.  Computational physics of the mind , 1996 .

[51]  R. Shepard.  Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space , 1957 .

[52]  R. Teghtsoonian.  The standard model for perceived magnitude: a framework for (almost) everything known about it. , 2012, The American journal of psychology.

[53]  Leonid I. Perlovsky,et al.  Physics of the Mind , 2016, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[54]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997, Complex.

[55]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures , 2008, Science.

[56]  S S Stevens,et al.  To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law: A power function, not a log function, describes the operating characteristic of a sensory system. , 1961, Science.

[57]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[58]  F. Petzschner,et al.  A Bayesian perspective on magnitude estimation , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  Włodzisław Duch,et al.  Visualization for understanding of neurodynamical systems , 2011, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[60]  Anthony F. Beavers.  The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science , 2009 .

[61]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Review: Neural Coding and the Basic Law of Psychophysics , 2002, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[62]  C. Allen,et al.  Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2011 .

[63]  R. Teghtsoonian,et al.  Range effects in psychophysical scaling and a revision of Stevens' law. , 1973, The American journal of psychology.

[64]  John Locke.  Mind-Brain Relations , Geometric Perspective and Neurophenomenology , 2012 .

[65]  Tao Xin,et al.  Sequential Effects in Essay Ratings: Evidence of Assimilation Effects Using Cross-Classified Models , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[66]  Kristie Miller,et al.  Temporal Experience: Models, Methodology and Empirical Evidence , 2015 .

[67]  M. Teghtsoonian,et al.  Range and regression effects in magnitude scaling , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[68]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  A choice theory analysis of similarity judgments , 1961 .

[69]  Wlodzislaw Duch.  Kurt Lewin, psychological constructs and sources of brain cognitive activity , 2017, 1711.01767.

[70]  V. Walsh,et al.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[71]  K. Lewin,et al.  A Dynamic Theory of Personality - Selected Papers , 2008 .

[72]  S. S. Stevens.  On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[73]  Carlos D. Brody,et al.  Human performance on the temporal bisection task , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[74]  Kristin Andrews.  The Animal Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Animal Cognition , 2014 .

[75]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The middle way. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[76]  F. Petzschner,et al.  Iterative Bayesian Estimation as an Explanation for Range and Regression Effects: A Study on Human Path Integration , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[77]  G. Ekman.  Weber's Law and Related Functions , 1959 .

[78]  K H Norwich,et al.  On the theory of Weber fractions , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[79]  F. Urban.  The Central Tendency of Judgment. , 2022 .

[80]  David K. Robinson.  Fechner's "inner psychophysics". , 2010, History of psychology.

[81]  R. Shepard.  Stimulus and response generalization: deduction of the generalization gradient from a trace model. , 1958, Psychological review.

[82]  Helga Lejeune,et al.  Vierordt's The Experimental Study of the Time Sense (1868) and its legacy , 2009 .

[83]  Vincent Walsh.  A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[84]  J. A. Scott Kelso,et al.  On the Self-Organizing Origins of Agency , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[85]  John C. Baird,et al.  Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics , 1978 .

[86]  L. E. Krueger.  Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Toward a unified psychophysical law , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[87]  Rolf G. Kuehni,et al.  The Measurement of Sensation , 2005 .

[88]  G. Róheim,et al.  Psychology of time perception. , 1946, The Psychoanalytic quarterly.

[89]  Carlos Alós-Ferrer,et al.  Inertia and Decision Making , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[90]  K H Norwich,et al.  Unification of psychophysical phenomena: The complete form of Fechner’s law , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[91]  Wlodzislaw Duch,et al.  Understanding neurodynamical systems via Fuzzy Symbolic Dynamics , 2010, Neural Networks.

[92]  C. Alberini,et al.  Memory , 2006, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[93]  G. Ermentrout.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997 .

[94]  Lance Nizami,et al.  A Computational Test of the Information-Theory Based Entropy Theory of Perception : Does It Actually Generate the Stevens and Weber-Fechner Laws of Sensation ? , 2009 .

[95]  R. Teghtsoonian,et al.  On the exponents in Stevens' law and the constant in Ekman's law. , 1971, Psychological review.

[96]  Marshall G. Hussain Shuler,et al.  Memory bias in the temporal bisection point , 2015, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[97]  John C. Baird,et al.  Psychophysical study of numbers , 1975 .

[98]  Uri Alon,et al.  Logarithmic and Power Law Input-Output Relations in Sensory Systems with Fold-Change Detection , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[99]  Liliana Albertazzi,et al.  Psychology from an empirical standpoint , 2006 .

[100]  Neil Stewart,et al.  Psychophysics and the judgment of price: Judging complex objects on a non-physical dimension elicits sequential effects like those in perceptual tasks , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[101]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[102]  Bodo Winter,et al.  Of magnitudes and metaphors: Explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number , 2015, Cortex.

[103]  Wlodzislaw Duch.  Mind as a shadow of neurodynamics. , 2019, Physics of life reviews.

[104]  S. Stevens.  To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law , 2008 .

[105]  G. Gescheider.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[106]  Alexander A. Petrov,et al.  Additive or Multiplicative Perceptual Noise? Two Equivalent Forms of the ANCHOR Model , 2008 .