Multi-penalty conditional random field approach to super-resolved reconstruction of optical coherence tomography images.

Improving the spatial resolution of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images is important for the visualization and analysis of small morphological features in biological tissue such as blood vessels, membranes, cellular layers, etc. In this paper, we propose a novel reconstruction approach to obtaining super-resolved OCT tomograms from multiple lower resolution images. The proposed Multi-Penalty Conditional Random Field (MPCRF) method combines four different penalty factors (spatial proximity, first and second order intensity variations, as well as a spline-based smoothness of fit) into the prior model within a Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimation framework. Test carried out in retinal OCT images illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed MPCRF reconstruction approach in terms of spatial resolution enhancement, as compared to previously published super resolved image reconstruction methods. Visual assessment of the MPCRF results demonstrate the potential of this method in better preservation of fine details and structures of the imaged sample, as well as retaining the sharpness of biological tissue boundaries while reducing the effects of speckle noise inherent to OCT. Quantitative evaluation using imaging metrics such as Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR), Equivalent Number of Looks (ENL), and Edge Preservation Parameter show significant visual quality improvement with the MPCRF approach. Therefore, the proposed MPCRF reconstruction approach is an effective tool for enhancing the spatial resolution of OCT images without the necessity for significant imaging hardware modifications.

[1]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Kernel Regression for Image Processing and Reconstruction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Michael Elad,et al.  Advances and challenges in super‐resolution , 2004, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[3]  Alexander Wong,et al.  General Bayesian estimation for speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography retinal imagery. , 2010, Optics express.

[4]  Michael Elad,et al.  Fast and robust multiframe super resolution , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  M. Bashkansky,et al.  Statistics and reduction of speckle in optical coherence tomography. , 2000, Optics letters.

[6]  Deepu Rajan,et al.  Generalized interpolation and its application in super-resolution imaging , 2001, Image Vis. Comput..

[7]  M. El-Shenawee,et al.  Parallel implementation of the steepest descent fast multipole method (SDFMM) on a Beowulf cluster for subsurface sensing applications , 2002, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters.

[8]  Bernd Hamann,et al.  Correction of motion artifacts and scanning beam distortions in 3D ophthalmic optical coherence tomography imaging , 2007, SPIE BiOS.

[9]  Maciej Wojtkowski,et al.  Efficient Reduction of Speckle Noise in Optical Coherence Tomography References and Links , 2022 .

[10]  Feng Luan,et al.  Application of RPCA in optical coherence tomography for speckle noise reduction , 2013 .

[11]  Peter D Woolliams,et al.  Spatially deconvolved optical coherence tomography. , 2010, Applied optics.

[12]  William T. Freeman,et al.  Example-Based Super-Resolution , 2002, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[13]  Guoguang Mu,et al.  Deconvolution methods for image deblurring in optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image Super-Resolution Via Sparse Representation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography , 1991 .

[16]  Kostadinka Bizheva,et al.  Interval type-II fuzzy anisotropic diffusion algorithm for speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography images. , 2009, Optics express.

[17]  Shutao Li,et al.  Sparsity based denoising of spectral domain optical coherence tomography images , 2012, Biomedical optics express.

[18]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  Semiautomated segmentation of the choroid in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography volume scans. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  Robert L. Stevenson,et al.  Super-resolution from image sequences-a review , 1998, 1998 Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Cat. No. 98CB36268).

[20]  Manuel Guizar-Sicairos,et al.  Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms. , 2008, Optics letters.

[21]  Thomas Martini Jørgensen,et al.  Enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio in ophthalmic optical coherence tomography by image registration--method and clinical examples. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[22]  James G. Fujimoto,et al.  Motion correction in optical coherence tomography volumes on a per A-scan basis using orthogonal scan patterns , 2012, Biomedical optics express.

[23]  G. Staurenghi,et al.  Aligning scan locations from consecutive spectral-domain optical coherence tomography examinations: a comparison among different strategies. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  Alexander Wong,et al.  Homotopic, non-local sparse reconstruction of optical coherence tomography imagery. , 2012, Optics express.

[25]  Edmund Y Lam,et al.  Speckle reduction of endovascular optical coherence tomography using a generalized divergence measure. , 2012, Optics letters.

[26]  Jannick P Rolland,et al.  Spectral shaping to improve the point spread function in optical coherence tomography. , 2003, Optics letters.

[27]  C. Dainty,et al.  Adaptive optics enhanced simultaneous en-face optical coherence tomography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 2006, Optics express.

[28]  Wotao Yin,et al.  An Iterative Regularization Method for Total Variation-Based Image Restoration , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[29]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  Intra-retinal Layer Segmentation in Optical Coherence Tomography Using an Active Contour Approach , 2009, MICCAI.

[30]  Zhao Ren,et al.  High-speed, high-resolution Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system for retinal imaging in the 1060 nm wavelength region. , 2008, Optics letters.

[31]  Yalin Zheng,et al.  Automatic segmentation of anterior segment optical coherence tomography images , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[32]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Speckle in optical coherence tomography. , 1999, Journal of biomedical optics.

[33]  R. Keys Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing , 1981 .

[34]  James G. Fujimoto,et al.  In vivo imaging of the rodent eye with swept source/Fourier domain OCT , 2013, Biomedical optics express.

[35]  Moon Gi Kang,et al.  Super-resolution image reconstruction: a technical overview , 2003, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[36]  Maciej Szkulmowski,et al.  Averaging techniques for OCT imaging. , 2013, Optics express.

[37]  Bo Liu,et al.  Optimal spectral reshaping for resolution improvement in optical coherence tomography. , 2006, Optics express.

[38]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Efficient Fourier-Wavelet Super-Resolution , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[39]  M. Larsen,et al.  Enhanced optical coherence tomography imaging by multiple scan averaging , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[40]  P. Georges,et al.  Motion artifact suppression in full-field optical coherence tomography. , 2010, Applied optics.

[41]  Ying Gu,et al.  Speckle-constrained variational methods for image restoration in optical coherence tomography. , 2013, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[42]  M. Brezinski Optical Coherence Tomography: Principles and Applications , 2006 .