Design Science Research on Systems Analysis and Design: The Case of UML

Design science in the IS discipline seeks to create artifacts that embody the ideas, practices, technical capabilities, and products required to efficiently accomplish the analysis, design, implementation, and use of information systems (Hevner et al 2006). SA&D research, being close to the design science paradigm, has suffered from a lack of appreciation from the behavioral science paradigm. To provide a paradigmatic foundation, we propose a conceptual framework for SA&D research. The framework was developed based on several essays that systematically articulate the design science paradigm in the IS field. Using this framework, we reviewed some UML papers that appeared in the proceedings of AMCIS. This preliminary literature analysis indicates that our framework for SA&D research is viable and does manifest itself in the IS literature.

[1]  Keng Siau,et al.  Theoretical and Practical Complexity of UML , 2004, AMCIS.

[2]  Narasimha Bolloju Exploring Quality Dependencies among UML Artifacts Developed by Novice Systems Analysts , 2006, AMCIS.

[3]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[4]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[6]  Vijayan Sugumaran,et al.  MODELING XBRL USING UML: IMPROVING SEMANTICS FOR FINANCIAL ANALYSIS , 2002 .

[7]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  How UML is used , 2006, CACM.

[8]  Stevan Mrdalj,et al.  Mapping the UML to the Zachman Framework , 2005, AMCIS.

[9]  Keng Siau,et al.  A Semiotics View of Modeling Method Complexity - The Case of UML , 2005, AMCIS.

[10]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  Process-Centered Requirements Engineering , 1996 .

[11]  Richard V. McCarthy,et al.  The Unified Modeling Language: An inquiry into current practices and user perceptions , 2004, AMCIS.

[12]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Towards a distinctive body of knowledge for Information Systems experts: coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[13]  Qing Cao Assessing Productivity of UML-based Systems Analysis and Design: A DEA Approach , 2004, AMCIS.

[14]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[16]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[17]  Jia-Lang Seng,et al.  Toward a Generic Transformation between B2Bi Standards of UML and XML , 2004, AMCIS.

[18]  Peter P. Chen The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data , 1975, VLDB '75.

[19]  Keng Siau,et al.  ANALYZING UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGEUSING CONCEPT MAPPING , 2002 .

[20]  Vijayan Sugumaran,et al.  Modeling XBRL-based Applications with UML: Developing Balanced-Scorecard Management Appraisal Systems , 2006, AMCIS.

[21]  Cris Kobryn UML 2001: a standardization odyssey , 1999, CACM.

[22]  Robert Jackson Application System Requirements Definition Using the Unified Modeling Language (UML) , 1998 .

[23]  Keng Siau,et al.  Unified Modeling Language: Theoretical and Practical Complexity , 2003, AMCIS.

[24]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Research in Information Systems Analysis and Design: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[26]  Chang Liu,et al.  Mapping UML to XML: An Object-Oriented Approach to Developing E-Business Applications , 2001 .

[27]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The Information Technology Interaction Model: A Foundation for the MBA Core Course , 1995, MIS Q..

[28]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[29]  Shouhong Wang Experiences with the Unified Modeling Language (UML) , 2001 .

[30]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[31]  Keng Siau,et al.  An Investigation into the Continued Use of Unified Modeling Language (UML) in Information Systems Development , 2005, AMCIS.

[32]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..