Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membranes at different pH

Abstract In this work the effect of pH on membrane structure, its permeability and retention was studied. In addition, we studied whether the possible changes in the membrane properties due to the pH change are reversible. This is important for understanding the performance of nanofiltration membranes at different conditions and for the selection of cleaning processes. Moreover, the results facilitate the choice of membrane for specific applications. Several commercial NF membranes were studied at different pH values. Their retention and flux were explained by the charge and the hydrophilic characteristics of the membranes. The filtrations were made with uncharged sugar and salt solutions. The lower the membrane contact angle (i.e., a more hydrophilic membrane) the higher was the change in apparent zeta potential when pH was increased from 4 to 7. As a result, the retention of ions with more hydrophilic membranes changed more than hydrophobic ones when the pH was increased in the feed solution. However, some membranes retained ions well at high pH although their apparent zeta potential or hydrophilicity was relatively low. These membranes had charge inside the pores and it was not detected by streaming potential measurement along the surface or by measuring the contact angle of the surface. Thus, the apparent zeta potential of the exterior membrane surface did not sufficiently describe the ionic transport through the membrane. In addition, some membranes became significantly more open at high pH (i.e., flux increased). This was explained by the chemical nature of the polymer chains in the membrane skin layer, i.e., dissociating groups in the polymer made the surface more hydrophilic and looser when charges of the polymer chains started to repel each other at elevated pH. Generally, the retention of uncharged glucose decreased more at high pH than the salt retention. The changes in permeabilities and retentions were found to be mostly reversible in the pH range studied (very slowly in some cases, however).

[1]  A. Szymczyk,et al.  Influence of the Membrane Pore Conductance on Tangential Streaming Potential , 2003 .

[2]  P. Prádanos,et al.  Contact angles and external protein adsorption onto UF membranes , 1999 .

[3]  W. Bowen,et al.  The use of atomic force microscopy to quantify membrane surface electrical properties , 2002 .

[4]  Yazhen Xu,et al.  Investigation of the solute separation by charged nanofiltration membrane : effect of pH, ionic strength and solute type , 1999 .

[5]  Mika Mänttäri,et al.  Comparison of nanofiltration and tight ultrafiltration membranes in the filtration of paper mill process water , 2002 .

[6]  V. Freger,et al.  TFC polyamide membranes modified by grafting of hydrophilic polymers: an FT-IR/AFM/TEM study , 2002 .

[7]  A. Szymczyk,et al.  Determining the ζ-potential of plane membranes from tangential streaming potential measurements: effect of the membrane body conductance , 2003 .

[8]  M. Nyström,et al.  Fouling and retention of nanofiltration membranes , 1995 .

[9]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[10]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Linearized transport model for nanofiltration: Development and assessment , 2002 .

[11]  W. P. Ball,et al.  NANOFILTRATION OF NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER: pH AND IONIC STRENGTH EFFECTS , 1997 .

[12]  J. Brant,et al.  Examining the electrochemical properties of a nanofiltration membrane with atomic force microscopy , 2006 .

[13]  S. Yamamoto,et al.  New composite charged reverse osmosis membrane , 1988 .

[14]  G. Hagmeyer,et al.  Modelling the rejection of nanofiltration membranes using zeta potential measurements , 1999 .

[15]  A. Pihlajamäki,et al.  Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements , 1994 .

[16]  Mika Mänttäri,et al.  Critical flux in NF of high molar mass polysaccharides and effluents from the paper industry , 2000 .

[17]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  Salt retention in nanofiltration with multilayer ceramic TiO2 membranes , 2002 .

[18]  L. Weiser,et al.  Characteristics of thin-film nanofiltration membranes at various pH-values , 2003 .

[19]  G. Hagmeyer,et al.  Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values , 1998 .

[20]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1996 .

[21]  A. Pihlajamäki Electrochemical Characterisation of Filter Media Properties and Their Exploitation in Enhanced Filtration , 1998 .

[22]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Relating Nanofiltration Membrane Performance to Membrane Charge (Electrokinetic) Characteristics , 2000 .

[23]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  Separation of monovalent and divalent ions from aqueous solution by electrodialysis and nanofiltration. , 2004, Water research.

[24]  V. Ribitsch,et al.  Role of Channel Wall Conductance in the Determination of ζ-Potential from Electrokinetic Measurements , 2002 .