The purpose of this study was to investigate whether correction with respect to reference tissue of T2-weighted MRimage signal intensity (SI) improves its effectiveness for classification of regions of interest (ROIs) as prostate cancer (PCa) or normal prostatic tissue. Two image datasets collected retrospectively were used in this study: 71 cases acquired with GE scanners (dataset A), and 59 cases acquired with Philips scanners (dataset B). Through a consensus histology- MR correlation review, 175 PCa and 108 normal-tissue ROIs were identified and drawn manually. Reference-tissue ROIs were selected in each case from the levator ani muscle, urinary bladder, and pubic bone. T2-weighted image SI was corrected as the ratio of the average T2-weighted image SI within an ROI to that of a reference-tissue ROI. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of T2-weighted image SIs for differentiation of PCa from normal-tissue ROIs. AUC (± standard error) for uncorrected T2-weighted image SIs was 0.78±0.04 (datasets A) and 0.65±0.05 (datasets B). AUC for corrected T2-weighted image SIs with respect to muscle, bladder, and bone reference was 0.77±0.04 (p=1.0), 0.77±0.04 (p=1.0), and 0.75±0.04 (p=0.8), respectively, for dataset A; and 0.81±0.04 (p=0.002), 0.78±0.04 (p<0.001), and 0.79±0.04 (p<0.001), respectively, for dataset B. Correction in reference to the levator ani muscle yielded the most consistent results between GE and Phillips images. Correction of T2-weighted image SI in reference to three types of extra-prostatic tissue can improve its effectiveness for differentiation of PCa from normal-tissue ROIs, and correction in reference to the levator ani muscle produces consistent T2-weighted image SIs between GE and Phillips MR images.
[1]
C. Metz,et al.
A New Approach for Testing the Significance of Differences Between ROC Curves Measured from Correlated Data
,
1984
.
[2]
M. Giger,et al.
Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study.
,
2013,
Radiology.
[3]
Thomas Hambrock,et al.
Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging.
,
2011,
Radiology.
[4]
H. Shinmoto,et al.
Prostate cancer screening: The clinical value of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2‐weighted imaging
,
2007,
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[5]
Aytekin Oto,et al.
Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging.
,
2013,
Radiology.