The development of first year physics students' ideas about measurement in terms of point and set paradigms

The ideas of first year university students about measurement in the physics laboratory are explored. Student responses to written probes administered at the beginning of the year are compared to those written after a 12 week laboratory course. The 'point' and 'set' paradigms are used as a model to analyse the responses to the probes. At the heart of the point paradigm is that both action and reasoning are based solely on individual measurements in a data set. On the other hand, subscribing to the set paradigm implies an understanding that a series of measurements are to be viewed as a collective that can be modelled by theoretical constructs, such as the mean and standard deviation. The degree of consistent use of these paradigms by individual students across the sets of probes is investigated. Implications for effective teaching interventions in the physics laboratory are discussed.

[1]  Bob Campbell,et al.  Point and Set Paradigms in Students’ Handling of Experimental Measurements , 2001 .

[2]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Preparing Students for Competent Scientific Practice: Implications of Recent Research in Science and Technology Studies , 1999 .

[3]  Marie-Geneviève Séré,et al.  Pupils' Reasoning and Practice during Hands-on Activities in the Measurement Phase. , 1998 .

[4]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Practical Work in Science: Time for a Reappraisal , 1991 .

[5]  Fred Lubben,et al.  Children's ideas about the reliability of experimental data , 1996 .

[6]  Paul J. Germann,et al.  Identifying patterns and relationships among the responses of seventh‐grade students to the science process skill of designing experiments , 1996 .

[7]  Marie-Geneviève Séré,et al.  Learning the statistical analysis of measurement errors , 1993 .

[8]  Bob Campbell,et al.  First‐year physics students’ perceptions of the quality of experimental measurements , 1998 .

[9]  John Leach,et al.  University science students' experiences of investigative project work and their images of science , 1999 .

[10]  Paul J. Germann,et al.  Student performances on the science processes of recording data, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and providing evidence , 1996 .

[11]  A. V. Heuvelen,et al.  Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research‐based instructional strategies , 1991 .

[12]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Reasoning about data in middle school science , 1999 .

[13]  Richard Gott,et al.  Practical work: its role in the understanding of evidence in science , 1996 .

[14]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[15]  L. Schauble,et al.  Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation , 1991 .

[16]  S. Allie,et al.  Point and Set Reasoning in Practical Science Measurement by Entering University Freshmen. , 2001 .