Phonological Influences on Lexical (Mis)Selection

Speakers produce words to convey meaning, but does meaning alone determine which words they say? We report three experiments that show independent semantic and phonological influences converging to determine word selection. Speakers named pictures (e.g., of a priest) following visually presented cloze sentences that primed either semantic competitors of the target object name (“The woman went to the convent to become a …”), homophones of the competitors (“I thought that there would still be some cookies left, but there were …”), or matched unrelated control object names. Primed semantic competitors (nun) were produced instead of picture names more often than primed unrelated control object names, showing the well-documented influence of semantic similarity on lexical selection. Surprisingly, primed homophone competitors (none) also substituted for picture names more often than control object names even though they only sounded like competitors. Thus, independent semantic and phonological influences can converge to affect word selection.

[1]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[2]  H. H. Clark.  Speech errors as linguistic evidence. , 1975 .

[3]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[4]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[5]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data , 1981 .

[6]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[7]  N. Martin,et al.  Variables influencing the occurrence of naming errors: Implications for models of lexical retrieval☆ , 1989 .

[8]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Effects of Frequency and Vocabulary Type on Phonological Speech Errors , 1990 .

[9]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1991 .

[10]  B. Baars.  Experimental slips and human error : exploring the architecture of volition , 1992 .

[11]  Bernard J. Baars,et al.  Experimental slips and human error , 1992 .

[12]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[13]  J. Jescheniak,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production , 1994 .

[14]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[15]  Nadine Martin,et al.  Phonological Facilitation of Semantic Errors in Normal and Aphasic Speakers , 1996 .

[16]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  Ninety-three pictures and 108 questions for the elicitation of homophones , 1997, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[19]  A. Caramazza.  How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[20]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Constraint, Word Frequency, and the Relationship between Lexical Processing Levels in Spoken Word Production , 1998 .

[21]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  A. Postma.  Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models , 2000, Cognition.

[24]  B. Rapp,et al.  Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. , 2000, Psychological review.

[25]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Lexical access in speech production , 2000 .

[26]  G. Dell,et al.  Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  A Caramazza,et al.  The specific-word frequency effect: implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Victor S. Ferreira,et al.  Syntactic Influences on Lexical and Morphological Processing in Language Production , 2001 .

[29]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Recency Effects for Meaning and Form in Word Selection , 2002, Brain and Language.

[30]  Frank Wijnen,et al.  Phonological Encoding and Monitoring in Normal and Pathological Speech , 2005 .

[31]  Martin Corley,et al.  Phonological Encoding and Monitoring in Normal and Pathological Speech , 2005 .