The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation.

The differential adhesion hypothesis (DAH), advanced in the 1960s, proposed that the liquid-like tissue-spreading and cell segregation phenomena of development arise from tissue surface tensions that in turn arise from differences in intercellular adhesiveness. Our earlier measurements of liquid-like cell aggregate surface tensions have shown that, without exception, a cell aggregate of lower surface tension tends to envelop one of higher surface tension to which it adheres. We here measure the surface tensions of L cell aggregates transfected to express N-, P- or E-cadherin in varied, measured amounts. We report that in these aggregates, in which cadherins are essentially the only cell-cell adhesion molecules, the aggregate surface tensions are a direct, linear function of cadherin expression level. Taken together with our earlier results, the conclusion follows that the liquid-like morphogenetic cell and tissue rearrangements of cell sorting, tissue spreading and segregation represent self-assembly processes guided by the diminution of adhesive-free energy as cells tend to maximize their mutual binding. This conclusion relates to the physics governing these morphogenetic phenomena and applies independently of issues such as the specificities of intercellular adhesives.

[1]  M. Takeichi,et al.  Functional correlation between cell adhesive properties and some cell surface proteins , 1977, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  A K Harris,et al.  Is Cell sorting caused by differences in the work of intercellular adhesion? A critique of the Steinberg hypothesis. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Tatsuzo Nagai,et al.  A three-dimensional vertex dynamics cell model of space-filling polyhedra simulating cell behavior in a cell aggregate. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  G. B. Grunwald The conceptual and experimental foundations of vertebrate embryonic cell adhesion research. , 1991, Developmental biology.

[5]  N S Goel,et al.  A rheological mechanism sufficient to explain the kinetics of cell sorting. , 1972, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  G. Forgacs,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of living embryonic tissues: a quantitative study. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Steinberg,et al.  Liquid properties of embryonic tissues: Measurement of interfacial tensions. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[8]  G Wayne Brodland,et al.  The Differential Interfacial Tension Hypothesis (DITH): a comprehensive theory for the self-rearrangement of embryonic cells and tissues. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  Scott F. Gilbert,et al.  A Conceptual History of Modern Embryology , 2012, Developmental Biology.

[10]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and tissue segregation: qualitative and quantitative determinants. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[11]  Akinao Nose,et al.  Expressed recombinant cadherins mediate cell sorting in model systems , 1988, Cell.

[12]  A. Curtis Timing mechanisms in the specific adhesion of cells. , 1961, Experimental cell research.

[13]  M. Takeichi,et al.  Expression of N-cadherin adhesion molecules associated with early morphogenetic events in chick development , 1986, Nature.

[14]  S. Gilbert,et al.  Townes and Holtfreter (1955): directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells. , 2004, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Comparative experimental biology.

[15]  G. S. Davis,et al.  Germ-layer surface tensions and "tissue affinities" in Rana pipiens gastrulae: quantitative measurements. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[16]  D. Lee,et al.  Relation between the rate of cell movement under agarose and the positioning of cells in heterotypic aggregates. , 1989, Experimental cell research.

[17]  Malcolm S. Steinberg,et al.  Reconstruction of Tissues by Dissociated Cells , 1963 .

[18]  M. Takeichi,et al.  Experimental specification of cell sorting, tissue spreading, and specific spatial patterning by quantitative differences in cadherin expression. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  B. Geiger,et al.  Formation of heterotypic adherens-type junctions between L-CAM-containing liver cells and A-CAM-containing lens cells , 1987, Cell.

[20]  B. Rose,et al.  An inhibition of gap-junctional communication by cadherins. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[21]  G. Forgacs,et al.  Surface tensions of embryonic tissues predict their mutual envelopment behavior. , 1996, Development.

[22]  Moscona Aa,et al.  Biological and biochemical studies on embryonic cell-cell recognition. , 1977 .

[23]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Does differential adhesion govern self-assembly processes in histogenesis? Equilibrium configurations and the emergence of a hierarchy among populations of embryonic cells. , 1970, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[24]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  ON THE MECHANISM OF TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION BY DISSOCIATED CELLS, III. FREE ENERGY RELATIONS AND THE REORGANIZATION OF FUSED, HETERONOMIC TISSUE FRAGMENTS. , 1962, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  M. Takeichi,et al.  Cadherins: a molecular family important in selective cell-cell adhesion. , 1990, Annual review of biochemistry.

[26]  J. Nutting,et al.  Interfacial Phenomena , 1959, Nature.

[27]  B. Gumbiner,et al.  Molecular and functional analysis of cadherin-based adherens junctions. , 1997, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[28]  M S Steinberg Cell-cell recognition in multicellular assembly: levels of specificity. , 1978, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[29]  H. M. Phillips Liquid-Tissue Mechanics in Amphibian Gastrulation: Germ-Layer Assembly in Rana Pipiens , 1978 .

[30]  L. Reichardt,et al.  The cadherin-binding specificities of B-cadherin and LCAM , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Equilibrium measurements of embryonic chick cell adhesiveness. I. Shape equilibrium in centrifugal fields. , 1969, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  I. Gelfand,et al.  Contact interactions between epitheliocytes and fibroblasts: Formation of heterotypic cadherin-containing adhesion sites is accompanied by local cytoskeletal reorganization , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Steinberg Ms,et al.  Cell-cell recognition in multicellular assembly: levels of specificity. , 1978 .

[34]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Mechanism of Tissue Reconstruction by Dissociated Cells, II: Time-Course of Events , 1962, Science.

[35]  M. Takeichi,et al.  R-cadherin: A novel Ca2+-dependent cell-cell adhesion molecule expressed in the retina , 1991, Neuron.

[36]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Embryonic tissues as elasticoviscous liquids. II. Direct evidence for cell slippage in centrifuged aggregates. , 1977, Developmental biology.

[37]  M. Takeichi,et al.  Ectopic expression of N-cadherin perturbs histogenesis in Xenopus embryos. , 1990, Development.

[38]  G. Tsujimoto,et al.  Identification of three human type-II classic cadherins and frequent heterophilic interactions between different subclasses of type-II classic cadherins. , 2000, The Biochemical journal.

[39]  Malcolm S. Steinberg,et al.  Liquid behavior of embryonic tissues , 1982 .

[40]  M. Burger,et al.  Cell and tissue interactions , 1977 .

[41]  N. Tolbert,et al.  Protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples: manual and automated procedures. , 1981, Methods in enzymology.

[42]  Michael Locke,et al.  Cellular membranes in development , 1964 .

[43]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Adhesion in development: an historical overview. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[44]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  On the mechanism of tissue reconstruction by dissociated cells. I. Population kinetics, differential adhesiveness. and the absence of directed migration. , 1962, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion and tissue segregation in relation to malignancy. , 2004, The International journal of developmental biology.

[46]  G Brockhoff,et al.  Flow cytometric detection and quantitation of the epidermal growth factor receptor in comparison to Scatchard analysis in human bladder carcinoma cell lines. , 1994, Cytometry.

[47]  Malcolm S. Steinberg,et al.  The Problem of Adhesive Selectivity in Cellular Interactions , 1964 .

[48]  Philip L. Townes,et al.  Directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells , 1955 .

[49]  G. S. Davis Migration-Directing Liquid Properties of Embryonic Amphibian Tissues , 1984 .

[50]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Embryonic tissues as elasticoviscous liquids. I. Rapid and slow shape changes in centrifuged cell aggregates. , 1978, Journal of cell science.

[51]  N. Copeland,et al.  Cell binding specificity of mouse R-cadherin and chromosomal mapping of the gene. , 1993, Journal of cell science.

[52]  A. P. Soler,et al.  Interaction of alpha-actinin with the cadherin/catenin cell-cell adhesion complex via alpha-catenin , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[53]  Carien M. Niessen,et al.  Cadherin-mediated cell sorting not determined by binding or adhesion specificity , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.