Non-electronic communication aids for people with complex communication needs

Non-electronic communication aids provide one form of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) for people with complex communication needs. The aim here was to explore non-electronic communication aids as one AAC option and research challenges. This aim was addressed by reviewing funding for the provision of AAC systems, data from an Australian pilot project providing non-electronic communication aids, an audit of aided AAC published studies (2000–2009), and discussion of the review literature. Combined, these sources indicate that although there is great demand for non-electronic communication aids, funding schemes, both in Australia and internationally, have focused on electronic communication aids. Such funding has usually failed to meet the total device costs and has not provided for adequate speech-language pathology support. Data from the pilot indicated the demand for non-electronic communication aids, and patterns suggest potential factors that govern the types selected. Despite the high demand for non-electronic aids, the research literature has tended to focus on electronic communication aids, including within intervention studies and addressing design features and long-term outcomes. Concerns about ensuring that AAC systems are chosen according to the assessed needs of individuals are discussed within the context of limitations in outcomes research and appropriate outcome measures.

[1]  L. Lloyd,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective , 1994 .

[2]  C. W. Gorenflo,et al.  Effects of synthetic voice output on attitudes toward the augmented communicator. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  Ivana Marková,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication systems used by people with cerebral palsy in Scotland: Demographic survey , 1995 .

[4]  A. Russell,et al.  Use of AAC by individuals with acquired neurologic communication disabilities: Results of an Australian survey , 1995 .

[5]  Cynthia K. Thompson,et al.  Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adult , 1995 .

[6]  E Moodie,et al.  AAC systems: obstacles to effective use. , 1996, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[7]  E Moodie,et al.  Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. , 1997, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[8]  J. Light,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication to support receptive and expressive communication for people with autism. , 1998, Journal of communication disorders.

[9]  S. Balandin,et al.  AAC and Australian speech pathologists: report on a national survey , 1998 .

[10]  R. Schlosser.  Social validation of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication , 1999 .

[11]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Comparative efficacy of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication , 1999 .

[12]  Gary D. Cumley,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication options for children with developmental apraxia of speech: three case studies , 1999 .

[13]  Ann R. Beck,et al.  Attitudes of school-aged children toward their peers who use augmentative and alternative communication , 2000 .

[14]  D. Angelo.  Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families , 2000 .

[15]  R. Schlosser,et al.  Promoting generalization and maintenance in augmentative and alternative communication: A meta-analysis of 20 years of effectiveness research , 2000 .

[16]  Ann R. Beck,et al.  Influence of length of augmented message on children's attitudes toward Peers who use augmentative and alternative communication , 2000 .

[17]  Lori Goetz,et al.  Professional Skills for Serving Students Who Use AAC in General Education Classrooms: A Team Perspective. , 2001, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[18]  Jeff Sigafoos,et al.  Conditional Use of Aided and Unaided AAC , 2001 .

[19]  Pat Mirenda,et al.  Autism, Augmentative Communication, and Assistive Technology , 2001 .

[20]  M. Doyle,et al.  Trends in augmentative and alternative communication use by individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2001 .

[21]  H. P. Parette,et al.  Conversations with Mexican Americans Regarding Children with Disabilities and Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2001 .

[22]  L. Hickson,et al.  The validity of functional assessments of communication and the Activity/Participation components of the ICIDH-2: do they reflect what really happens in real-life? , 2002, Journal of communication disorders.

[23]  T. Iacono,et al.  PICTURE IT: an evaluation of a training program for carers of adults with severe and multiple disabilities , 2003 .

[24]  Pat Mirenda,et al.  Toward Functional Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Students With Autism: Manual Signs, Graphic Symbols, and Voice Output Communication Aids. , 2003, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[25]  T. Iacono.  The evidence base for augmentative and alternative communication , 2004 .

[26]  B. Jacobs,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) for adults with severe aphasia: where we stand and how we can go further , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[27]  Joan Murphy.  "I Prefer Contact This Close": Perceptions of AAC by People with Motor Neurone Disease and their Communication Partners , 2004 .

[28]  J. Marshall,et al.  "Pushes and Pulls" on the Parents of Children who use AAC , 2004 .

[29]  Gloria Soto,et al.  Perceptions of AAC: An Ethnographic Investigation of Mexican-American Families , 2004 .

[30]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Evidence-Based Practice in Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2004 .

[31]  David McNaughton,et al.  “When I First Got It, I Wanted to Throw It Off a Cliff”: The Challenges and Benefits of Learning AAC Technologies as Described by Adults who use AAC , 2005 .

[32]  Dean Sutherland,et al.  AAC use and service provision: A survey of New Zealand speech-language therapists , 2005 .

[33]  Janice C Light,et al.  Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part I – what is a “good” outcome? , 2006, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[34]  K. Hux,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication use and acceptance by adults with Traumatic Brain Injury , 2006, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[35]  E. Wilson,et al.  Too little too late: Wait times and cost burden for people with a disability in seeking equipment funding in Victoria. , 2006 .

[36]  C. Velozo,et al.  Adding meaning to measurement: Initial Rasch analysis of the ASHA FACS Social Communication Subtest , 2006 .

[37]  Rita L. Bailey,et al.  Family members' perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. , 2006, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[38]  Barry T. Wagner,et al.  Developmental memory capacity resources of typical children retrieving picture communication symbols using direct selection and visual linear scanning with fixed communication displays. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  D. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative & Alternative Communication: Supporting Children & Adults With Complex Communication Needs , 2006 .

[40]  Ivan Yuen,et al.  Understanding speech production using electropalatography , 2007 .

[41]  恵子 紀国谷.  国際生活機能分類(International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF)にみた福祉・保健・医療の専門職協働における連携に関する貢献と課題 , 2007 .

[42]  J. Humphreys,et al.  Recruitment of speech pathologists into positions considered less attractive , 2007 .

[43]  Janice C Light,et al.  Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part II – communicative interaction , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[44]  John T. Gould,et al.  Baking around the world , 2007 .

[45]  S. Hodge,et al.  Why is the potential of augmentative and alternative communication not being realized? Exploring the experiences of people who use communication aids , 2007 .

[46]  L. Hickson,et al.  The use of the ICF in speech-language pathology research: Towards a research agenda , 2008 .

[47]  T. Threats.  Use of the ICF for clinical practice in speech-language pathology , 2008 .

[48]  K. Price,et al.  Elation or frustration? Outcomes following the provision of equipment during the Communication Aids Project: data from one CAP partner centre. , 2008, Child: care, health and development.

[49]  T. Iacono,et al.  Reliability and validity of the revised Triple C: Checklist of Communicative Competencies for adults with severe and multiple disabilities. , 2009, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[50]  T. Iacono,et al.  Australian Speech-Language Pathologists' Perceptions and Experiences of Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Early Childhood Intervention , 2009, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[51]  C. Bigby,et al.  Maximizing community inclusion through mainstream communication services for adults with severe disabilities , 2009 .