The Chloroplast Triggers Developmental Reprogramming When MUTS HOMOLOG1 Is Suppressed in Plants1[W][OA]

Multicellular eukaryotes demonstrate nongenetic, heritable phenotypic versatility in their adaptation to environmental changes. This inclusive inheritance is composed of interacting epigenetic, maternal, and environmental factors. Yet-unidentified maternal effects can have a pronounced influence on plant phenotypic adaptation to changing environmental conditions. To explore the control of phenotypy in higher plants, we examined the effect of a single plant nuclear gene on the expression and transmission of phenotypic variability in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). MutS HOMOLOG1 (MSH1) is a plant-specific nuclear gene product that functions in both mitochondria and plastids to maintain genome stability. RNA interference suppression of the gene elicits strikingly similar programmed changes in plant growth pattern in six different plant species, changes subsequently heritable independent of the RNA interference transgene. The altered phenotypes reflect multiple pathways that are known to participate in adaptation, including altered phytohormone effects for dwarfed growth and reduced internode elongation, enhanced branching, reduced stomatal density, altered leaf morphology, delayed flowering, and extended juvenility, with conversion to perennial growth pattern in short days. Some of these effects are partially reversed with the application of gibberellic acid. Genetic hemicomplementation experiments show that this phenotypic plasticity derives from changes in chloroplast state. Our results suggest that suppression of MSH1, which occurs under several forms of abiotic stress, triggers a plastidial response process that involves nongenetic inheritance.

[1]  J. Claverie,et al.  Two new subfamilies of DNA mismatch repair proteins (MutS) specifically abundant in the marine environment , 2011, The ISME Journal.

[2]  J. Ryals,et al.  A Sister Group Contrast Using Untargeted Global Metabolomic Analysis Delineates the Biochemical Regulation Underlying Desiccation Tolerance in Sporobolus stapfianus[C][W][OA] , 2011, Plant Cell.

[3]  Detlef Weigel,et al.  Double-strand break repair processes drive evolution of the mitochondrial genome in Arabidopsis , 2011, BMC Biology.

[4]  J. Ingram,et al.  THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF DEHYDRATION TOLERANCE IN PLANTS. , 1996, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[5]  C. Queitsch,et al.  The HSP90 chaperone complex, an emerging force in plant development and phenotypic plasticity. , 2005, Current opinion in plant biology.

[6]  Peter Widmayer,et al.  Genevestigator V3: A Reference Expression Database for the Meta-Analysis of Transcriptomes , 2008, Adv. Bioinformatics.

[7]  J. Messing,et al.  CARPEL FACTORY, a Dicer Homolog, and HEN1, a Novel Protein, Act in microRNA Metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2002, Current Biology.

[8]  T. Day,et al.  Nongenetic Inheritance and Its Evolutionary Implications , 2009 .

[9]  K. Donohue.  Completing the cycle: maternal effects as the missing link in plant life histories , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  S. J. Ambrose,et al.  The etr1-2 mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana affects the abscisic acid, auxin, cytokinin and gibberellin metabolic pathways during maintenance of seed dormancy, moist-chilling and germination. , 2005, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[11]  W. Sakamoto.  Leaf-variegated mutations and their responsible genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2003, Genes & genetic systems.

[12]  C. Schwechheimer,et al.  Gibberellin Regulates PIN-FORMED Abundance and Is Required for Auxin Transport–Dependent Growth and Development in Arabidopsis thaliana[C][W] , 2011, Plant Cell.

[13]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R. Jansen,et al.  Epigenome dynamics: a quantitative genetics perspective , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[15]  Alex Mesoudi,et al.  Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  H. Moriyama,et al.  Mitochondrial Genome Dynamics in Plants and Animals: Convergent Gene Fusions of a MutS Homologue , 2006, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[17]  A. Christensen,et al.  Diversity of the Arabidopsis Mitochondrial Genome Occurs via Nuclear-Controlled Recombination Activity , 2009, Genetics.

[18]  Christian G Elowsky,et al.  MutS HOMOLOG1 Is a Nucleoid Protein That Alters Mitochondrial and Plastid Properties and Plant Response to High Light[W][OA] , 2011, Plant Cell.

[19]  M. Aluru,et al.  Variegation mutants and mechanisms of chloroplast biogenesis. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[20]  N. Tuteja,et al.  Polyamines and abiotic stress tolerance in plants , 2010, Plant signaling & behavior.

[21]  Joy Bergelson,et al.  Towards identifying genes underlying ecologically relevant traits in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[22]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias , 2003, Bioinform..

[23]  S. Mackenzie,et al.  Extensive Rearrangement of the Arabidopsis Mitochondrial Genome Elicits Cellular Conditions for Thermotolerance1[W][OA] , 2010, Plant Physiology.

[24]  A. Elo,et al.  Substoichiometric shifting in the plant mitochondrial genome is influenced by a gene homologous to MutS , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  S. Mackenzie,et al.  Transgenic induction of mitochondrial rearrangements for cytoplasmic male sterility in crop plants , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  F. Miller.  Registration of RTx430 Sorghum Parental Line , 1984 .

[27]  A. Christensen,et al.  Plant Mitochondrial Recombination Surveillance Requires Unusual RecA and MutS Homologs[OA] , 2007, The Plant Cell Online.

[28]  L. Galloway.  Maternal effects provide phenotypic adaptation to local environmental conditions. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[29]  Pierre R. Bushel,et al.  Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[30]  Fabio Fornara,et al.  SnapShot: Control of Flowering in Arabidopsis , 2010, Cell.

[31]  Julie R. Etterson,et al.  Transgenerational Plasticity Is Adaptive in the Wild , 2007, Science.