Automated interpretation of time-lapse quantitative phase image by machine learning to study cellular dynamics during epithelial–mesenchymal transition

Abstract. Significance: Machine learning is increasingly being applied to the classification of microscopic data. In order to detect some complex and dynamic cellular processes, time-resolved live-cell imaging might be necessary. Incorporating the temporal information into the classification process may allow for a better and more specific classification. Aim: We propose a methodology for cell classification based on the time-lapse quantitative phase images (QPIs) gained by digital holographic microscopy (DHM) with the goal of increasing performance of classification of dynamic cellular processes. Approach: The methodology was demonstrated by studying epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) which entails major and distinct time-dependent morphological changes. The time-lapse QPIs of EMT were obtained over a 48-h period and specific novel features representing the dynamic cell behavior were extracted. The two distinct end-state phenotypes were classified by several supervised machine learning algorithms and the results were compared with the classification performed on single-time-point images. Results: In comparison to the single-time-point approach, our data suggest the incorporation of temporal information into the classification of cell phenotypes during EMT improves performance by nearly 9% in terms of accuracy, and further indicate the potential of DHM to monitor cellular morphological changes. Conclusions: Proposed approach based on the time-lapse images gained by DHM could improve the monitoring of live cell behavior in an automated fashion and could be further developed into a tool for high-throughput automated analysis of unique cell behavior.

[1]  Maryam Rezaei,et al.  The expression of VE-cadherin in breast cancer cells modulates cell dynamics as a function of tumor differentiation and promotes tumor–endothelial cell interactions , 2017, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[2]  Gabriel Popescu,et al.  Breast cancer diagnosis using spatial light interference microscopy , 2015, Journal of biomedical optics.

[3]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[4]  Radim Chmelik,et al.  Automated classification of cell morphology by coherence-controlled holographic microscopy. , 2017, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  Van Lam,et al.  Quantitative scoring of epithelial and mesenchymal qualities of cancer cells using machine learning and quantitative phase imaging , 2020, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  K. Parvati,et al.  Image Segmentation Using Gray-Scale Morphology and Marker-Controlled Watershed Transformation , 2008 .

[7]  J. Čolláková,et al.  The Role of Coherence in Image Formation in Holographic Microscopy , 2014 .

[8]  Jean Paul Thiery,et al.  EMT: 2016 , 2016, Cell.

[9]  R. Barer Refractometry and interferometry of living cells. , 1957, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  Frank Dubois,et al.  Automated three-dimensional detection and classification of living organisms using digital holographic microscopy with partial spatial coherent source: application to the monitoring of drinking water resources. , 2013, Applied optics.

[11]  Miroslav Hejna,et al.  High accuracy label-free classification of single-cell kinetic states from holographic cytometry of human melanoma cells , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[12]  T Zikmund,et al.  Sequential processing of quantitative phase images for the study of cell behaviour in real‐time digital holographic microscopy , 2014, Journal of microscopy.

[13]  J. D. de Munck,et al.  Quantitative Third Harmonic Generation Microscopy for Assessment of Glioma in Human Brain Tissue , 2019, Advanced science.

[14]  Barry R. Masters,et al.  Quantitative Phase Imaging of Cells and Tissues , 2012 .

[15]  Eamonn J. Keogh,et al.  A symbolic representation of time series, with implications for streaming algorithms , 2003, DMKD '03.

[16]  Evangelia Gavgiotaki,et al.  Detection of the T cell activation state using nonlinear optical microscopy , 2018, Journal of biophotonics.

[17]  Christoph Sommer,et al.  Machine learning in cell biology – teaching computers to recognize phenotypes , 2013, Journal of Cell Science.

[18]  Bahram Javidi,et al.  Cell morphology-based classification of red blood cells using holographic imaging informatics. , 2016, Biomedical optics express.

[19]  George Nehmetallah,et al.  Machine Learning with Optical Phase Signatures for Phenotypic Profiling of Cell Lines , 2019, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[20]  Hadj Batatia,et al.  Wavelet-based statistical classification of skin images acquired with reflectance confocal microscopy. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.

[21]  R. Crystal,et al.  A SNAIL1–SMAD3/4 transcriptional repressor complex promotes TGF-β mediated epithelial–mesenchymal transition , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[22]  Thomas Kreis,et al.  Digital holographic interference-phase measurement using the Fourier-transform method , 1986 .

[23]  Gabriel Popescu,et al.  Prostate cancer diagnosis using quantitative phase imaging and machine learning algorithms , 2015, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[24]  Randy Wayne Light and video microscopy , 2008 .

[25]  J. Bergh,et al.  Ribosome biogenesis during cell cycle arrest fuels EMT in development and disease , 2019, Nature Communications.

[26]  Radim Chmelík,et al.  Coherence-controlled holographic microscope. , 2010, Optics express.

[27]  O. S. Kurochkina,et al.  Application of multiphoton imaging and machine learning to lymphedema tissue analysis. , 2019, Biomedical optics express.

[28]  Optical imaging of metabolic dynamics in animals , 2018, Nature Communications.

[29]  George Nehmetallah,et al.  Quantitative assessment of cancer cell morphology and motility using telecentric digital holographic microscopy and machine learning , 2018, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[30]  J. Fuxe,et al.  Transcriptional crosstalk between TGFβ and stem cell pathways in tumor cell invasion: Role of EMT promoting Smad complexes , 2010, Cell cycle.

[31]  R. Barer Interference Microscopy and Mass Determination , 1952, Nature.

[32]  Ferat Sahin,et al.  A survey on feature selection methods , 2014, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[33]  Zhiqing Zhang,et al.  Extracting morphologies from third harmonic generation images of structurally normal human brain tissue , 2017, Bioinform..

[34]  Petra Kaufmann,et al.  Two Dimensional Phase Unwrapping Theory Algorithms And Software , 2016 .

[35]  Eamonn J. Keogh,et al.  Scaling up dynamic time warping for datamining applications , 2000, KDD '00.

[36]  R. Chmelík,et al.  Off-axis setup taking full advantage of incoherent illumination in coherence-controlled holographic microscope. , 2013, Optics express.