Early diagnosis of threatened premature labor by electrohysterographic recordings – The use of digital signal processing

Abstract Prevention and early diagnosis of imminent preterm labor are considered to be the most important perinatal challenge nowadays. Significant progress has been observed on postnatal care of premature infants, but without reducing the prevalence of preterm delivery. Our study was focused on comparison of three methods of spectral analysis of electrohysterographic (EHG) signals: fast Fourier transform (FFT), wavelet transform (WT) and autoregressive modeling (AR). Complexity of the electrohysterographic signals was analyzed by using: the approximate entropy (ApEn), Lempel–Ziv complexity measure (L–Z). Additionally, the work evaluated the applicability of EHG in diagnosing imminent premature labor. EHG signals were recorded among 60 patients with threatened preterm labor symptoms between the 24th and 34th week of pregnancy. Patients included to the study had a shortened cervix (less than 20 mm) without regular uterine contractions recorded on regular cardiotocography (CTG). The women were divided into two groups: those delivering within 7 days – group A ( n  = 15) and women delivering after 7 days – group B ( n  = 45). The study confirmed differences in bioelectrical activity of uterus between patients delivering prematurely within 7 days and after from the EHG registration for all analyzed methods.

[1]  T. Laudański,et al.  The effect of combined tocolysis on in vitro uterine contractility in preterm labour. , 2011, Advances in medical sciences.

[2]  B. Hayes-Gill,et al.  Uterine Activity Monitoring during Labour – A Multi-Centre, Blinded Two-Way Trial of External Tocodynamometry against Electrohysterography , 2011, Zeitschrift fìr Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie.

[3]  Roberto Romero,et al.  Metabolomics in premature labor: a novel approach to identify patients at risk for preterm delivery , 2010, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[4]  Metin Akay,et al.  Approximate Entropy and its Application in Biosignal Analysis , 2000 .

[5]  L. Chyczewskî,et al.  Expression of selected genes in preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes , 2012, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

[6]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[7]  Stefano Sello,et al.  Effect of medication in Parkinson's disease: a wavelet analysis of EMG signals. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part II. Contractions parameters]. , 2008, Ginekologia polska.

[9]  A. D. Lieto,et al.  Prenatal Telemedicine: A New System for Conventional and Computerized Telecardiotocography and Tele-Ultrasonography , 2011 .

[10]  B. Zeevi,et al.  Maternal self‐administered fetal heart rate monitoring and transmission from home in high‐risk pregnancies , 2004, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[11]  José María Amigó,et al.  Characterizing spike trains with Lempel-Ziv complexity , 2004, Neurocomputing.

[12]  T. Laudański,et al.  Assessment of the selected biochemical markers in predicting preterm labour , 2012, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[13]  Richard Kronland-Martinet,et al.  Analysis of Sound Patterns through Wavelet transforms , 1987, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[14]  G. Saade,et al.  Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery , 2004, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[15]  D. Gupta Electrohysterography may be integral to remifentanil Labor analgesia , 2012, Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine.

[16]  J. Staessen,et al.  Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability by autoregressive modelling and fast Fourier transform: a comparative study. , 1998, Acta cardiologica.

[17]  Adam Gacek,et al.  A new approach to cardiotocographic fetal monitoring based on analysis of bioelectrical signals , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[18]  R. Romero,et al.  A short cervix in women with preterm labor and intact membranes: a risk factor for microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  E. Oczeretko,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics in Uterine Contractions Analysis , 2005 .

[20]  Marta Borowska,et al.  Application of the Lempel-Ziv complexity measure to the analysis of biosignals and medical images , 2005 .

[21]  T. Laudański,et al.  Total matrix metalloproteinase-8 serum levels in patients labouring preterm and patients with threatened preterm delivery. , 2010, Folia histochemica et cytobiologica.

[23]  G. M. Ungureanu,et al.  Prenatal Telemedicine – Advances in Fetal Monitoring , 2011 .

[24]  N. Thakor,et al.  Spectral analysis methods for neurological signals , 1998, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  T. Laudański,et al.  Decreased serum level of macrophage inflammatory chemokine-3beta/CCL19 in preterm labor and delivery. , 2006, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[26]  J. Jezewski,et al.  Quantitative analysis of contraction patterns in electrical activity signal of pregnant uterus as an alternative to mechanical approach , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[27]  Shalom Darmanjian,et al.  Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  R. Romero,et al.  Timing the delivery of the preterm severely growth‐restricted fetus: venous Doppler, cardiotocography or the biophysical profile? , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[29]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1971 .

[30]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part I. Contractions monitoring]. , 2008, Ginekologia polska.

[31]  Roberto Romero,et al.  Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth , 2008, The Lancet.

[32]  S M Pincus,et al.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Abraham Lempel,et al.  On the Complexity of Finite Sequences , 1976, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[34]  R. Kitney,et al.  Biomedical signal processing (in four parts) , 1991, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.