Better Communication = Better Teams: A Communication Exercise to Improve Team Performance

Background: Teams are a basic way of organizing work in many professional and personal settings. However, misunderstandings among team members can lead to poor performance, hurt feelings, and lack of motivation to attack subsequent tasks. A common source of such misunderstandings is miscommunication caused by differences in how people interpret everyday words and phrases. Team members might interpret these differences as a natural occurrence of group work, if they notice them at all. Research questions: We seek to answer two research questions regarding miscommunication within teams: (1) Can a communication exercise create awareness among team members of the danger of miscommunication? (2) What benefits do team members gain from the exercise? Situating the case: We describe a classroom exercise that relies on an integrative model for improving communication within teams. We also present evidence of the exercise's effectiveness in raising awareness and fostering accommodation and social learning among team members. Our approach is similar to that used in other cases. How this case was studied: We used 13 teams from three classes during the course of a regular semester. A communication exercise we have used for many years was conducted as part of team formation activities early in the semester. Team discussions regarding exercise results formed the basis for team members to analyze their communication during the semester. About the case: A significant variance of understanding among people as to the meaning of several of the focal terms can lead to suboptimal outcomes for any given work the team is tasked to achieve. In this case, we describe a study designed to improve communication among team members and, thus, lessen the likelihood of such a negative outcome. Results: Team members reported better awareness of communication issues and improved team functioning as a result of having completed the exercise. Conclusion: We find that a shared understanding of terminology is an important part of training leaders and managers to help teams reduce common miscommunication problems in the workplace.

[1]  Leanna L. Holmer Will we Teach Leadership or Skilled Incompetence? The Challenge of Student Project Teams , 2001 .

[2]  Debra Burleson Communication Challenges in the Hospital Setting , 2014 .

[3]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[4]  S. Levinson,et al.  The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[5]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Preparing Undergraduate Computer Science Students to Face Intercultural and Multidisciplinary Scenarios , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[6]  Paaige K. Turner,et al.  A Meaning-Centered Approach to Customer Satisfaction , 2006 .

[7]  Noam Chomsky Language and Other Cognitive Systems. What Is Special About Language? , 2011 .

[8]  Kobin H. Kendrick,et al.  Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  Pam Estes Brewer,et al.  Teaching and Learning in Cross-Disciplinary Virtual Teams , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[10]  Pamela Estes Brewer,et al.  Miscommunication in International Virtual Workplaces: A Report on a Multicase Study , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[11]  Jenny Gibb,et al.  Virtual Team Learning: An Introductory Study Team Exercise , 2006 .

[12]  Anne H. Reilly,et al.  Managing Intercultural Teams: the Eorganization Exercise , 2008 .

[13]  Alan C. Mikkelson,et al.  Communication Competence, Leadership Behaviors, and Employee Outcomes in Supervisor-Employee Relationships , 2015 .

[14]  A "Worldview" of Disaster: Organizational Sensemaking in a Wildland Firefighting Tragedy , 2003 .

[15]  Pavel Zemliansky Achieving Experiential Cross-cultural Training Through a Virtual Teams Project , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[16]  Janet Hillier,et al.  Groups Meet . . . Teams Improve , 2013 .

[17]  Feng-Yang Kuo,et al.  A Study of How Information System Professionals Comprehend Indirect and Direct Speech Acts in Project Communication , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[18]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do Speakers Avoid Ambiguities During Dialogue? , 2005, Psychological science.

[19]  D. Baker Enhancing Group Decision Making: An Exercise to Reduce Shared Information Bias , 2010 .

[20]  Kip R. Krumwiede,et al.  Using Simulation to Explore Lean Manufacturing Implementation Strategies , 2010 .

[21]  Karol Janicki A hindrance to communication: the use of difficult and incomprehensible language , 2002 .

[22]  B. Tuckman DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  N. Sheehan,et al.  JetFighter: An Experiential Value Chain Exercise , 2010 .

[24]  Jane English THE COMMUNICATION PROBLEMS EXPERIENCED BY WORKFORCE ON-SITE, AND THEIR POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS , 2002 .

[25]  Terence L. Holmes,et al.  Obfuscating the Obvious , 2009 .

[26]  Patricia D. Rafferty Group Work in the MBA Classroom , 2013 .