Effects of Strong Electrical Shock on Cardiac Muscle Tissue a

Electrical shock is deliberately applied to the heart in the clinical setting for pacemaking, cardioversion, defibrillation, and ablation.' The strength of the applied shock varies with the intended application, from low values used for pacemaking, to higher levels used first for cardioversion and then for defibrillation, and ultimately to destructive levels utilized for electrical ablation. The region of tissue targeted by the current may in some cases be highly localized (e.g., with pacemaking or electrical ablation) or in other cases global in extent (e.g., with defibrillation). In the case of automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (AICDs), the shock is commonly delivered through two flexible patch electrodes situated on the epicardial surface of the ventricles.2 This configuration deserves special consideration with respect to unintentional injury to the heart. It is believed that successful defibrillation is achieved when the bulk of the heart is subjected to a minimum level of potential gradient. On the other hand, the potential gradient is unavoidably nonuniform, with the highest level in the region adjacent to the shock electrodes. With high shock levels, animal experiments have clearly shown that tissue in this region can undergo depression in cardiac function. Although the extent of myocardial damage is less clear in h ~ r n a n s , ~ mild electrocardiographic changes can be observed even following the lower intensity shock used for cardioversion.3 Effects observed in animal studies include altered electrophysiology, arrhythmia, coronary artery dilatation, impaired contractility, ultrastructural changes, hemorrhage, depletion of essential enzymes, and ultimately tissue n e c r o s i ~ . ~ , ~ One of the most immediate indices of myocardial injury in the heart is electrophysiological, in the form of rhythm abnormalities (cardiac arrest, bradycardia, tachycardia, altered conduction), morphological changes in the ECG (QRS complex, ST segment, T wave), or decreases in cellular resting potential. There is substantial experimental and theoretical evidence suggesting that the electropathological effects of high-intensity electrical shock on cardiac muscle originate from electroporation of the cell membrane.6 The pathways by which applied electrical shock is coupled to the cardiac cetl membrane are shown in FIGURE 1.Ohm's law modified for volume conductors states that the potential gradient (i.e., voltage per unit length, or electric field) for a resistive medium is proportional to the current density (current per unit cross-

[1]  R E Jones,et al.  Microlesion formation in myocardial cells by high-intensity electric field stimulation. , 1987, The American journal of physiology.

[2]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Stimulation of Spheroidal Cells - The Role of Cell Shape , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  L Tung,et al.  Influence of electrical axis of stimulation on excitation of cardiac muscle cells. , 1991, Circulation research.

[4]  T. Tsong,et al.  Electroporation of cell membranes. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[5]  S. Rush,et al.  Response of cultured myocardial cells to countershock-type electric field stimulation. , 1978, The American journal of physiology.

[6]  M. R. Tarasevich,et al.  246 - Electric breakdown of bilayer lipid membranes I. The main experimental facts and their qualitative discussion , 1979 .

[7]  P. Wolf,et al.  Current Concepts for Selecting the Location, Size and Shape of Defibrillation Electrodes , 1991, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[8]  Electrical Trauma: Electrical injury to heart muscle cells , 1992 .

[9]  H. Döring,et al.  Myocardial fiber necrosis due to intracellular Ca overload-a new principle in cardiac pathophysiology. , 1974, Recent advances in studies on cardiac structure and metabolism.

[10]  D Needham,et al.  Electro-mechanical permeabilization of lipid vesicles. Role of membrane tension and compressibility. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[11]  C. Proskauer,et al.  Ultrastructural Injury to Chick Myocardial Cells in Vitro Following "Electric Countershock" , 1980, Circulation research.

[12]  R E Ideker,et al.  Shock Strength for the Implantable Defibrillator: Can You Have Too Much of a Good Thing? , 1992, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[13]  R. Stampflj,et al.  Reversible electrical breakdown of the excitable membrane of a Ranvier node , 1958 .

[14]  L Tung,et al.  Analysis of electric field stimulation of single cardiac muscle cells. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[15]  L Tung,et al.  Electroporation and recovery of cardiac cell membrane with rectangular voltage pulses. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[16]  Y Kim,et al.  Uniformity of current density under stimulating electrodes. , 1990, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[17]  G. Klein,et al.  Defibrillation shocks increase myocardial pacing threshold: an intracellular microelectrode study. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[18]  H. Rogove,et al.  Defibrillation and cardioversion. , 1992, Critical care clinics.

[19]  Jerry H. Gold,et al.  Transthoracic Ventricular Defibrillation in the 100 kg Calf with Symmetrical One-Cycle Bidirectional Rectangular Wave Stimuli , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  J. Jones,et al.  Decreased defibrillator-induced dysfunction with biphasic rectangular waveforms. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[21]  J. Schuder,et al.  Incidence of Arrhythmias in the Dog Following Transthoracic Ventricular Defibrillation with Unidirectional Rectangular Stimuli , 1968, Circulation research.

[22]  R. Hauer,et al.  Ventricular Tachycardia After In Vivo DC Shock Ablation in Dogs: Electrophysiologic and Histologic Correlation , 1991, Circulation.

[23]  B. Lown,et al.  Cardioversion and Digitalis Drugs: Changed Threshold to Electric Shock in Digitalized Animals , 1965, Circulation research.

[24]  G. Christé,et al.  Membrane responses to large hyperpolarizations in trabecles and single cells of frog atrium. , 1988, General physiology and biophysics.

[25]  W. Lederer,et al.  Cellular Origins of the Transient Inward Current in Cardiac Myocytes. Role of Fluctuations and Waves of Elevated Intracellular Calcium , 1989, Circulation research.

[26]  P. Troup,et al.  Implantable cardioverters and defibrillators. , 1989, Current problems in cardiology.

[27]  P D Wolf,et al.  Three‐dimensional Potential Gradient Fields Generated by Intracardiac Catheter and Cutaneous Patch Electrodes , 1992, Circulation.

[28]  L. Chernomordik,et al.  The electrical breakdown of cell and lipid membranes: the similarity of phenomenologies. , 1987, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[29]  B PELESKA,et al.  Cardiac Arrhythmias Following Condenser Discharges and Their Dependence Upon Strength of Current and Phases of Cardiac Cycle , 1963, Circulation research.

[30]  M. Josephson,et al.  ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY Electrocardiographic changes after cardioversion of ventricular arrhythmias , 2005 .

[31]  D. Zipes Electrical therapy of cardiac arrhythmias. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  L Tung,et al.  Electroporation of Cardiac Cell Membranes with Monophasic or Biphasic Rectangular Pulses , 1991, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[33]  L. J. Fogelson,et al.  Electrophysiologic depression in myocardium by defibrillation-level shocks , 1988, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[34]  P. Wolf,et al.  Conduction disturbances caused by high current density electric fields. , 1990, Circulation research.

[35]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  The effect of pressure on the electrical breakdown in the membranes of Valonia utricularis. , 1977, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[36]  L Tung,et al.  Cell-attached patch clamp study of the electropermeabilization of amphibian cardiac cells. , 1991, Biophysical journal.