An immersogeometric formulation for free-surface flows with application to marine engineering problems

Abstract An immersogeometric formulation is proposed to simulate free-surface flows around structures with complex geometry. The fluid–fluid interface (air–water interface) is handled by the level set method, while the fluid–structure interface is handled through an immersogeometric approach by immersing structures into non-boundary-fitted meshes and enforcing Dirichlet boundary conditions weakly. Residual-based variational multiscale method (RBVMS) is employed to stabilize the coupled Navier–Stokes equations of incompressible flows and level set convection equation. Other level set techniques, including re-distancing and mass balancing, are also incorporated into the immersed formulation. Adaptive quadrature rule is used to better capture the geometry of the immersed structure boundary by accurately integrating the intersected background elements. Generalized- α method is adopted for time integration, which results in a two-stage predictor multi-corrector algorithm. GMRES solver preconditioned with block Jacobian matrices of individual fluid and level set subproblems is used for solving the coupled linear systems arising from the multi-corrector stage. The capability and accuracy of the proposed method are assessed by simulating three challenging marine engineering problems, which are a solitary wave impacting a stationary platform, dam break with an obstacle, and planing of a DTMB 5415 ship model. A refinement study is performed. The predictions of key quantities of interest by the proposed formulation are in good agreement with experimental results and boundary-fitted simulation results from others. The proposed formulation has great potential for wide applications in marine engineering problems.

[1]  R. Lahey,et al.  Computation of incompressible bubble dynamics with a stabilized finite element level set method , 2005 .

[2]  Ng Niels Deen,et al.  Numerical simulation of gas bubbles behaviour using a three-dimensional volume of fluid method , 2005 .

[3]  G. Tryggvason,et al.  A front-tracking method for viscous, incompressible, multi-fluid flows , 1992 .

[4]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Interface projection techniques for fluid–structure interaction modeling with moving-mesh methods , 2008 .

[5]  J. A. French,et al.  Wave uplift pressures on horizontal platforms , 1969 .

[6]  Claes Johnson Numerical solution of partial differential equations by the finite element method , 1988 .

[7]  Arthur Veldman,et al.  A Volume-of-Fluid based simulation method for wave impact problems , 2005 .

[8]  T. Hughes,et al.  Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows , 2007 .

[9]  Ju Liu Thermodynamically consistent modeling and simulation of multiphase flows , 2014 .

[10]  David Farrell,et al.  Immersed finite element method and its applications to biological systems. , 2006, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[11]  J. Sethian,et al.  Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations , 1988 .

[12]  Xiaowei Deng,et al.  Free-surface flow modeling and simulation of horizontal-axis tidal-stream turbines , 2017 .

[13]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves: significance of arterial wall deformation , 2014, Computational Mechanics.

[14]  Jinhui Yan,et al.  Residual-based variational multi-scale modeling for particle-laden gravity currents over flat and triangular wavy terrains , 2019, Computers & Fluids.

[15]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA , 2009 .

[16]  Jinhui Yan Computational Free-surface Fluid-structure Interaction with Applications on Offshore Wind and Tidal Energy , 2016 .

[17]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Free-Surface Flow and Fluid-Object Interaction Modeling With Emphasis on Ship Hydrodynamics , 2012 .

[18]  Ming-Chen Hsu,et al.  The tetrahedral finite cell method: Higher‐order immersogeometric analysis on adaptive non‐boundary‐fitted meshes , 2016 .

[19]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows☆ , 1981 .

[20]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Finite cell method , 2007 .

[21]  Y. Bazilevs,et al.  Isogeometric analysis of multi-phase flows with surface tension and with application to dynamics of rising bubbles , 2019, Computers & Fluids.

[22]  Baskar Ganapathysubramanian,et al.  Immersogeometric analysis of moving objects in incompressible flows , 2019, Computers & Fluids.

[23]  A. Korobenko,et al.  Computational free-surface fluid–structure interaction with application to floating offshore wind turbines , 2016 .

[24]  Tayfan E. Tezduyar,et al.  Stabilized Finite Element Formulations for Incompressible Flow Computations , 1991 .

[25]  James J. Feng,et al.  A diffuse-interface method for simulating two-phase flows of complex fluids , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  Y. Saad,et al.  GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems , 1986 .

[27]  Hector Gomez,et al.  Non-body-fitted fluid-structure interaction: Divergence-conforming B-splines, fully-implicit dynamics, and variational formulation , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[28]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Multiscale and Stabilized Methods , 2007 .

[29]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces , 1994 .

[30]  John A. Evans,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis , 2010 .

[31]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  A new formulation for air-blast fluid–structure interaction using an immersed approach. Part I: basic methodology and FEM-based simulations , 2017 .

[32]  Frederick Stern,et al.  Uncertainty Assessment for Towing Tank Tests With Example for Surface Combatant DTMB Model 5415 , 2005 .

[33]  I. Akkerman,et al.  Isogeometric analysis of free-surface flow , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[34]  Alex Main,et al.  The shifted boundary method for embedded domain computations. Part I: Poisson and Stokes problems , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..

[35]  T. Tezduyar,et al.  A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure. I: The concept and the preliminary numerical tests , 1992 .

[36]  Stephen Lin,et al.  A fully coupled finite element formulation for liquid–solid–gas thermo-fluid flow with melting and solidification , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[37]  Ernst Rank,et al.  The finite cell method for three-dimensional problems of solid mechanics , 2008 .

[38]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Surface tension problems solved with the Particle Finite Element Method using large time-steps , 2016 .

[39]  Ming-Chen Hsu,et al.  Immersogeometric analysis of compressible flows with application to aerodynamic simulation of rotorcraft , 2019, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences.

[40]  Arif Masud,et al.  Residual-based turbulence models and arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian framework for free surface flows , 2015 .

[41]  C. Peskin Flow patterns around heart valves: A numerical method , 1972 .

[42]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: simulating the full machine , 2012, Computational Mechanics.

[43]  G. Hulbert,et al.  A generalized-α method for integrating the filtered Navier–Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method , 2000 .

[44]  Jintai Chung,et al.  A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method , 1993 .

[45]  A. Korobenko,et al.  A new variational multiscale formulation for stratified incompressible turbulent flows , 2017 .

[46]  John A. Evans,et al.  Immersogeometric cardiovascular fluid-structure interaction analysis with divergence-conforming B-splines. , 2017, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[47]  Zhengtao Gan,et al.  Numerical simulation of thermal behavior and multicomponent mass transfer in direct laser deposition of Co-base alloy on steel , 2017 .

[48]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian finite element analysis of free surface flow , 2000 .

[49]  S. Osher,et al.  A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow , 1994 .

[50]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Computational Fluid-Structure Interaction: Methods and Applications , 2013 .

[51]  Adarsh Krishnamurthy,et al.  Direct immersogeometric fluid flow analysis using B-rep CAD models , 2016, Comput. Aided Geom. Des..

[52]  Taehun Lee,et al.  Single bubble rising dynamics for moderate Reynolds number using Lattice Boltzmann Method , 2010 .

[53]  T. Hughes,et al.  Error estimates for projection-based dynamic augmented Lagrangian boundary condition enforcement, with application to fluid–structure interaction , 2018, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences.

[54]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: application to bioprosthetic heart valves. , 2015, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[55]  T. Hughes,et al.  Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1990 .

[56]  Ming-Chen Hsu,et al.  The tetrahedral finite cell method for fluids: Immersogeometric analysis of turbulent flow around complex geometries , 2016 .

[57]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries , 1981 .

[58]  E. Shirani,et al.  Interface pressure calculation based on conservation of momentum for front capturing methods , 2005 .

[59]  D. Jacqmin Regular Article: Calculation of Two-Phase Navier–Stokes Flows Using Phase-Field Modeling , 1999 .

[60]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Finite Element Methods for Fluid Dynamics with Moving Boundaries and Interfaces , 2004 .

[61]  W. Wulff COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR MULTIPHASE FLOW , 1990 .

[62]  C. Peskin The immersed boundary method , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[63]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  A new formulation for air-blast fluid–structure interaction using an immersed approach: part II—coupling of IGA and meshfree discretizations , 2017 .

[64]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Finite element methods for flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces , 2001 .

[65]  Josef Kiendl,et al.  An anisotropic constitutive model for immersogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves. , 2018, Journal of biomechanics.

[66]  Ferdinando Auricchio,et al.  A framework for designing patient‐specific bioprosthetic heart valves using immersogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis , 2018, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[67]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Weak imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics , 2007 .

[68]  J. Nitsche Über ein Variationsprinzip zur Lösung von Dirichlet-Problemen bei Verwendung von Teilräumen, die keinen Randbedingungen unterworfen sind , 1971 .

[69]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Isogeometric divergence-conforming variational multiscale formulation of incompressible turbulent flows , 2017 .

[70]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  The multiscale formulation of large eddy simulation: Decay of homogeneous isotropic turbulence , 2001 .

[71]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[72]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Finite element stabilization parameters computed from element matrices and vectors , 2000 .

[73]  J. Best The formation of toroidal bubbles upon the collapse of transient cavities , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[74]  Victor M. Calo,et al.  Improving stability of stabilized and multiscale formulations in flow simulations at small time steps , 2010 .

[75]  Rama Govindarajan,et al.  Dynamics of an initially spherical bubble rising in quiescent liquid , 2015, Nature Communications.

[76]  Alex Main,et al.  The shifted boundary method for embedded domain computations. Part II: Linear advection-diffusion and incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..