Spatio-temporal skin strain distributions evoke low variability spike responses in cuneate neurons

A common method to explore the somatosensory function of the brain is to relate skin stimuli to neurophysiological recordings. However, interaction with the skin involves complex mechanical effects. Variability in mechanically induced spike responses is likely to be due in part to mechanical variability of the transformation of stimuli into spiking patterns in the primary sensors located in the skin. This source of variability greatly hampers detailed investigations of the response of the brain to different types of mechanical stimuli. A novel stimulation technique designed to minimize the uncertainty in the strain distributions induced in the skin was applied to evoke responses in single neurons in the cat. We show that exposure to specific spatio-temporal stimuli induced highly reproducible spike responses in the cells of the cuneate nucleus, which represents the first stage of integration of peripheral inputs to the brain. Using precisely controlled spatio-temporal stimuli, we also show that cuneate neurons, as a whole, were selectively sensitive to the spatial and to the temporal aspects of the stimuli. We conclude that the present skin stimulation technique based on localized differential tractions greatly reduces response variability that is exogenous to the information processing of the brain and hence paves the way for substantially more detailed investigations of the brain's somatosensory system.

[1]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Henrik Jörntell,et al.  Properties of Somatosensory Synaptic Integration in Cerebellar Granule Cells In Vivo , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  A. Iggo,et al.  Correlative physiological and morphological studies of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in cat's glabrous skin. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  S. Laurie Ricker,et al.  2-D finite-element models of tactile sensors , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Balasundar I Raju,et al.  3-D finite-element models of human and monkey fingertips to investigate the mechanics of tactile sense. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  V. Hayward,et al.  Finger pad friction and its role in grip and touch , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  A dense array stimulator to generate arbitrary spatio-temporal tactile stimuli , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[9]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Experimental Evidence of Lateral Skin Strain During Tactile Exploration , 2003 .

[10]  Alessandro S. Zagami,et al.  Von Frey's hairs – a review of their technology and use – a novel automated von Frey device for improved testing for hyperalgesia , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  V. Hayward,et al.  In vivo biomechanics of the fingerpad skin under local tangential traction. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  P. Delmas,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction in mammalian sensory neurons , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Slowly adapting type I afferents from the sides and end of the finger respond to stimuli on the center of the fingerpad. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  A W Goodwin,et al.  Sinusoidal movement of a grating across the monkey's fingerpad: temporal patterns of afferent fiber responses , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Jason C. Cohen,et al.  Under which conditions do the skin and probe decouple during sinusoidal vibrations? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  J. Phillips,et al.  Responses of human mechanoreceptive afferents to embossed dot arrays scanned across fingerpad skin , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Is there a ‘plenhaptic’ function? , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  R H LaMotte,et al.  Tactile detection of a dot on a smooth surface: peripheral neural events. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Display of virtual braille dots by lateral skin deformation: feasibility study , 2005, TAP.

[20]  Mark L Latash,et al.  Viscoelastic response of the finger pad to incremental tangential displacements. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  G. M.,et al.  A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity , 1906, Nature.

[22]  V Hayward,et al.  Effect of skin hydration on the dynamics of fingertip gripping contact , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  A. Love A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity , 1892 .

[24]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Minimal adhesion surface area in tangentially loaded digital contacts. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Angelo Arleo,et al.  Integration of Sensory Quanta in Cuneate Nucleus Neurons In Vivo , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  K. J. Ives,et al.  Experimental Methods (2) , 1978 .

[27]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  W. Smutz,et al.  A structural fingertip model for simulating of the biomechanics of tactile sensation. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[29]  A. Love,et al.  A treatise on the mathematical theory , 1944 .

[30]  K. Johnson Contact Mechanics: Frontmatter , 1985 .

[31]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Tactile Display Device Using Distributed Lateral Skin Stretch , 2000, Dynamic Systems and Control: Volume 2.

[32]  Henrik Jörntell,et al.  Reciprocal Bidirectional Plasticity of Parallel Fiber Receptive Fields in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells and Their Afferent Interneurons , 2002, Neuron.

[33]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Encoding of object curvature by tactile afferents from human fingers. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  K Sathian,et al.  Spatial and temporal factors determining afferent fiber responses to a grating moving sinusoidally over the monkey's fingerpad , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Tactile synthesis and perceptual inverse problems seen from the viewpoint of contact mechanics , 2008, TAP.

[36]  J. Phillips,et al.  Neural mechanisms of scanned and stationary touch. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  E. G. Jones,et al.  Cortical and subcortical contributions to activity-dependent plasticity in primate somatosensory cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  M A Srinivasan,et al.  Raised object on a planar surface stroked across the fingerpad: responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors to shape and orientation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Henrik Jörntell,et al.  Receptive Field Plasticity Profoundly Alters the Cutaneous Parallel Fiber Synaptic Input to Cerebellar Interneurons In Vivo , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Biomechanically Optimized Distributed Tactile Transducer Based on Lateral Skin Deformation , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[41]  K O Johnson,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: neural patterns evoked by braille‐like dot patterns in the monkey. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  R. Johansson,et al.  First spikes in ensembles of human tactile afferents code complex spatial fingertip events , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  D G Pelli,et al.  A device for measuring tactile spatiotemporal sensitivity. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  A. Iggo,et al.  A quantitative study of cutaneous receptors and afferent fibres in the cat and rabbit , 1967, The Journal of physiology.