A whole-farm strategy to reduce environmental impacts of nitrogen.

Dutch regulations for ammonia emission require farmers to inject slurry into the soil (shallow) or to apply it in narrow bands at the surface. For one commercial dairy farm in the Netherlands it was hypothesized that its alternative farming strategy, including low-protein feeding and surface spreading, could be an equally effective tool for ammonia emission abatement. The overall objective of the research was to investigate how management at this farm is related to nitrogen (N) losses to the environment, including groundwater and surface water. Gaseous emission of ammonia and greenhouse gasses from the naturally ventilated stables were 8.1 and 3.1 kg yr(-1) AU(-1) on average using the internal tracer (SF(6))-ratio method. Measurements on volatilization of ammonia from slurry application to the field using an integrated horizontal flux method and the micrometeorological mass balance method yielded relatively low values of ammonia emissions per ha (3.5-10.9 kg NH(3)-N ha(-1)). The mean nitrate concentration in the upper ground water was 6.7 mg L(-1) for 2004 and 3.0 mg L(-1) for 2005, and the half-year summer means of N in surface water were 2.3 mg N L(-1) and 3.4 mg N L(-1) for 2004 and 2005, respectively. Using a nutrient budget model for this farm, partly based on these findings, it was found that the calculated ammonia loss per ton milk (range 5.3-7.5 kg N Mg(-1)) is comparable with the estimated ammonia loss of a conventional farm that applies animal slurry using prescribed technologies.

[1]  Michael J. Goss,et al.  Can a farming systems approach help minimize nitrogen losses to the environment , 1995 .

[2]  T. Misselbrook,et al.  Dietary manipulation in dairy cattle: laboratory experiments to assess the influence on ammonia emissions. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  M. Heinen Application of a widely used denitrification model to Dutch data sets , 2006 .

[4]  D. Scholefield,et al.  The effects of nutrient losses from agriculture on ground and surface water quality: the position of science in developing indicators for regulation , 2004 .

[5]  James N. Galloway,et al.  Reactive Nitrogen: Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2002, Ambio.

[6]  J. Schröder,et al.  Long‐term nitrogen supply from cattle slurry , 2005 .

[7]  J. Erisman,et al.  Overview and assessment of techniques to measure ammonia emissions from animal houses: the case of the Netherlands. , 2005, Environmental pollution.

[8]  Søren Husted,et al.  Seasonal variation in methane emission from stored slurry and solid manures , 1994 .

[9]  P. A. Burrough,et al.  Soil acidification from atmospheric ammonium sulphate in forest canopy throughfall , 1982, Nature.

[10]  C. L. Beek,et al.  Denitrification rates in relation to groundwater level in a peat soil under grassland , 2004, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[11]  Lae,et al.  Uitgangspunten voor de mest- en ammoniakberekeningen 1999 tot en met 2001 zoals gebruikt in de Milieubalans 2001 en 2002, inclusief dataset landbouwemissies 1980 - 2001 , 2002 .

[12]  J.M.G. Hol,et al.  Onderzoek naar de emissies van een natuurlijk geventileerde potstal voor melkvee I : stal , 2005 .

[13]  Methodological considerations for nitrogen policies in the Netherlands including a new role for research , 2003 .

[14]  H. Berge,et al.  An evaluation of whole farm nitrogen balances and related indices for efficient nitrogen use , 2003 .

[15]  J.F.M. Huijsmans,et al.  Manure application and ammonia volatilization , 2003 .

[16]  D. E. Beever,et al.  Nitrogen pollution by dairy cows and its mitigation by dietary manipulation , 2001, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[17]  The contribution of dairy farming on peat soil to N and P loading of surface water , 2004, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.