Validation of active fire detection from moderate-resolution satellite sensors: the MODIS example in northern eurasia

This paper discusses the process of validating active fire "yes/no" binary fire detection products from moderate-resolution satellite sensors. General concepts and practical issues are illustrated by the validation of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) active fire product in Siberia. Coincident Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) imagery is used to characterize spatial patterns of flaming at sub-MODIS pixel scale. It is shown that for proper evaluation reference fire observations are needed at the scale of the satellite pixel, as only 60% of the MODIS footprints contain single contiguous clusters of ASTER fire pixels. In Siberia the size of a single ASTER fire cluster within the MODIS footprint that has a 50% probability of being flagged as "fire" is ~60, compared to ~45 in the Brazilian Amazon, whereas previous radiative transfer simulations suggested similar detection probabilities. The lower-than-expected detection rates in Siberia are largely attributable to flaming underneath heavy smoke, which is not detected by the current MODIS algorithm. Pixel-based and cluster-based omission error rates are derived, and it is shown that the probability of flagging as "fire" a MODIS pixel which contains a given number of 30-m ASTER fire pixels is typically 3-5 times lower than detecting a contiguous cluster with the same number of ASTER fire pixels. The procedures described are recommended for a consensus active fire validation protocol, but with the inclusion of multiplatform sensor configurations to complement the near-nadir angular sampling from single-platform observations such as MODIS and ASTER on Terra

[1]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  An Enhanced Contextual Fire Detection Algorithm for MODIS , 2003 .

[2]  E. Kasischke,et al.  AVHRR-based mapping of fires in Russia: New products for fire management and carbon cycle studies , 2004 .

[3]  D. Roy,et al.  Achieving sub-pixel geolocation accuracy in support of MODIS land science , 2002 .

[4]  Christopher O. Justice,et al.  A review of current space-based fire monitoring in Australia and the GOFC/GOLD program for international coordination , 2003 .

[5]  C. Justice,et al.  Global and Regional Vegetation Fire Monitoring from Space: Planning a Coordinated International Effort , 2001 .

[6]  IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 34. NO. 4, JULY 1996 Universal Multifractal Scaling of Synthetic , 1996 .

[7]  R. Welch,et al.  The 1985 Biomass Burning Season in South America: Satellite Remote Sensing of Fires, Smoke, and Regional Radiative Energy Budgets , 1998 .

[8]  Ruiliang Pu,et al.  Evaluation of algorithms for fire detection and mapping across North America from satellite , 2003 .

[9]  Louis Moreau,et al.  Monitoring fire activities in the boreal ecosystem , 1997 .

[10]  Yasushi Yamaguchi,et al.  Overview of Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Christopher O. Justice,et al.  Towards operational monitoring of terrestrial systems by moderate-resolution remote sensing , 2002 .

[12]  Josef Cihlar,et al.  Satellite-based mapping of Canadian boreal forest fires: Evaluation and comparison of algorithms , 2000 .

[13]  Siamak Khorram,et al.  Exact binomial confidence interval for proportions , 1998 .

[14]  P. Kennedy,et al.  An improved approach to fire monitoring in West Africa usingAVHRR data , 1994 .

[15]  C. Justice,et al.  Global fire activity from two years of MODIS data , 2005 .

[16]  J. Dozier.  A method for satellite identification of surface temperature fields of subpixel resolution , 1981 .

[17]  M. Wooster,et al.  Fire radiative energy for quantitative study of biomass burning: derivation from the BIRD experimental satellite and comparison to MODIS fire products. , 2003 .

[18]  Peter Brophy,et al.  Developments in the UK , 2002 .

[19]  Louis Giglio,et al.  Application of the Dozier retrieval to wildfire characterization: a sensitivity analysis , 2001 .

[20]  C. Justice,et al.  Potential global fire monitoring from EOS‐MODIS , 1998 .

[21]  Muriel Simon,et al.  THE ERS-2 ATSR-2 WORLD FIRE ATLAS AND THE ERS-2 ATSR-2 WORLD BURNT SURFACE ATLAS PROJECTS , 2001 .

[22]  C. Justice,et al.  Evaluation of global fire detection algorithms using simulated AVHRR infrared data , 1999 .

[23]  Daniela Stroppiana,et al.  Satellite monitoring of fire in the EXPRESSO study area during the 1996 dry season experiment: Active fires, burnt area, and atmospheric emissions , 1999 .

[24]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Comparative analysis of daytime fire detection algorithms using AVHRR data for the 1995 fire season in Canada: Perspective for MODIS , 2003 .

[25]  Jennifer Robinson,et al.  Fire from space : global fire evaluation using infrared remote sensing , 1991 .

[26]  E. Dwyer,et al.  Global spatial and temporal distribution of vegetation fire as determined from satellite observations , 2000 .

[27]  C. Justice,et al.  Validation of the MODIS active fire product over Southern Africa with ASTER data , 2005 .

[28]  D. Roy,et al.  An overview of MODIS Land data processing and product status , 2002 .

[29]  H. Eva,et al.  Remote Sensing of Biomass Burning in Tropical Regions: Sampling Issues and Multisensor Approach , 1998 .

[30]  C. O. Justicea,et al.  The MODIS fire products , 2002 .

[31]  J. Morisette,et al.  Accuracy Assessment Curves for Satellite-Based Change Detection , 2000 .

[32]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Developments in the 'validation' of satellite sensor products for the study of the land surface , 2000 .

[33]  J. Morisette.  Validation of MODIS Active Fire Detection Products Derived from Two Algorithms , 2005 .

[34]  C. Justice,et al.  A framework for the validation of MODIS Land products , 2002 .

[35]  J. Grégoire,et al.  The Global Fire Product: Daily fire occurrence from April 1992 to December 1993 derived from NOAA AVHRR data , 2000 .