Impact of the soil hydrology scheme on simulated soil moisture memory

Abstract Soil moisture–atmosphere feedback effects play an important role in several regions of the globe. For some of these regions, soil moisture memory may contribute significantly to the state and temporal variation of the regional climate. Identifying those regions can help to improve predictability in seasonal to decadal climate forecasts. In order to accurately simulate soil moisture memory and associated soil moisture–atmosphere interactions, an adequate representation of soil hydrology is required. The present study investigates how different setups of a soil hydrology scheme affect soil moisture memory simulated by the global climate model of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, ECHAM6/JSBACH. First, the standard setup is applied in which soil water is represented by a single soil moisture reservoir corresponding to the root zone. Second, a new five layer soil hydrology scheme is introduced where not only the root zone is differentiated into several layers but also layers below are added. Here, three variants of the new scheme are utilized to analyse how different characteristics of the soil hydrology and the associated fluxes influence soil moisture memory. Soil moisture memory of the different setups is analysed from global ECHAM6/JSBACH simulations forced by observed SST. Areas are highlighted where the regional climate seems to be sensitive to the improved representation of soil hydrology in the new setup and its variants. Results indicate that soil moisture memory is generally enlarged in regions during the dry season where a soil moisture buffer is present below the root zone due to the 5-layer scheme. This effect is usually enhanced when this buffer is increased. Memory tends to be weakened (strengthened) where bare soil evaporation is increased (decreased), especially in semi-arid regions and wet seasons. For some areas, this effect is compensated by a decreased (increased) transpiration.

[1]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  The representation of arctic soils in the land surface model: The importance of mosses , 2001 .

[2]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  The multi‐institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system , 2004 .

[3]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[4]  Lifeng Luo,et al.  Contribution of land surface initialization to subseasonal forecast skill: First results from a multi‐model experiment , 2010 .

[5]  N. Loeb,et al.  Surface Irradiances Consistent With CERES-Derived Top-of-Atmosphere Shortwave and Longwave Irradiances , 2013 .

[6]  Sonia I. Seneviratne,et al.  Observational evidence for soil-moisture impact on hot extremes in southeastern Europe , 2011 .

[7]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Regions of Strong Coupling Between Soil Moisture and Precipitation , 2004, Science.

[8]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Soil Moisture Memory in Climate Models , 2001 .

[9]  P. Milly,et al.  A Model-Based Investigation of Soil Moisture Predictability and Associated Climate Predictability , 2002 .

[10]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[11]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Persistence of heat waves and its link to soil moisture memory , 2010 .

[12]  A. Dalcher,et al.  A Simple Biosphere Model (SIB) for Use within General Circulation Models , 1986 .

[13]  Cort J. Willmott,et al.  GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION OF PLANT‐EXTRACTABLE WATER CAPACITY OF SOIL , 1996 .

[14]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  Creation of the WATCH Forcing Data and Its Use to Assess Global and Regional Reference Crop Evaporation over Land during the Twentieth Century , 2011 .

[15]  M. Claussen,et al.  The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: Model description and simulation of present-day climate , 1996 .

[16]  Dan Zaslavsky,et al.  Soil water dynamics , 1960 .

[17]  C. Taylor,et al.  Satellite detection of soil moisture impacts on convection at the mesoscale , 2006 .

[18]  Stefan Hagemann,et al.  A parametrization of the lateral waterflow for the global scale , 1997 .

[19]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Hydraulic lift: consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants , 1998, Oecologia.

[20]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Global intercomparison of 12 land surface heat flux estimates , 2011 .

[21]  A. Kleidon.  Global Datasets of Rooting Zone Depth Inferred from Inverse Methods , 2004 .

[22]  Alexander Loew,et al.  Combined evaluation of MPI‐ESM land surface water and energy fluxes , 2012 .

[23]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[24]  Stefan Hagemann,et al.  An improved land surface parameter dataset for global and regional climate models , 2002 .

[25]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Parametrization of peatland hydraulic properties for the Canadian land surface scheme , 2000, Data, Models and Analysis.

[26]  R. D. Richtmyer,et al.  Difference methods for initial-value problems , 1959 .

[27]  Wouter Dorigo,et al.  Potential and limitations of multidecadal satellite soil moisture observations for selected climate model evaluation studies , 2013 .

[28]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties , 1978 .

[29]  E. Todini,et al.  A rainfall–runoff scheme for use in the Hamburg climate model , 1992 .

[30]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Improved soil physics for simulating high latitude permafrost regions by the JSBACH terrestrial ecosystem model , 2013 .

[31]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review , 2010 .

[32]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Evaluation of global observations‐based evapotranspiration datasets and IPCC AR4 simulations , 2011 .

[33]  B. Stevens,et al.  Atmospheric component of the MPI‐M Earth System Model: ECHAM6 , 2013 .

[34]  L. Ahuja,et al.  Scaling and Estimating the Soil Water Characteristic Using a One-Parameter Model , 2003 .

[35]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Do Global Models Properly Represent the Feedback between Land and Atmosphere? , 2006, Journal of Hydrometeorology.

[36]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Root water uptake and transport: using physiological processes in global predictions. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[37]  Victor Brovkin,et al.  Global biogeophysical interactions between forest and climate , 2009 .

[38]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Soil Moisture Memory in AGCM Simulations: Analysis of Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (GLACE) Data , 2004 .

[39]  Jens Kattge,et al.  Will the tropical land biosphere dominate the climate–carbon cycle feedback during the twenty-first century? , 2007 .

[40]  Aaron A. Berg,et al.  Realistic Initialization of Land Surface States: Impacts on Subseasonal Forecast Skill , 2004 .

[41]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Land–atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe , 2006, Nature.

[42]  Claudia Golz,et al.  Observed historical discharge data from major rivers for climate model validation , 2000 .

[43]  Syukuro Manabe,et al.  The influence of potential evaporation on the variabilities of simulated soil wetness and climate , 1988 .

[44]  A. Warrick.  Soil Water Dynamics , 2003 .

[45]  Martin Wild,et al.  A new snow cover fraction parametrization for the ECHAM4 GCM , 2001 .

[46]  L. A. Richards.  Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums , 1931 .

[47]  P. Rowntree,et al.  Atmospheric Parameterization Schemes for Evaporation over Land: Basic Concepts and Climate Modeling Aspects , 1991 .

[48]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  The Role of Land-Atmosphere Interactions for Climate Variability in Europe , 2008 .

[49]  Recent glacial recession in the Rwenzori Mountains of East Africa due to rising air temperature , 2006 .

[50]  B. Ahrens,et al.  Soil‐moisture memory in the regional climate model COSMO‐CLM during the Indian summer monsoon season , 2013 .

[51]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Developing an improved soil moisture dataset by blending passive and active microwave satellite-based retrievals , 2011 .