Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 3: Runoff signatures in Austria

Abstract. This is the third of a three-part paper series through which we assess the performance of runoff predictions in ungauged basins in a comparative way. Whereas the two previous papers by Parajka et al. (2013) and Salinas et al. (2013) assess the regionalisation performance of hydrographs and hydrological extremes on the basis of a comprehensive literature review of thousands of case studies around the world, in this paper we jointly assess prediction performance of a range of runoff signatures for a consistent and rich dataset. Daily runoff time series are predicted for 213 catchments in Austria by a regionalised rainfall–runoff model and by Top-kriging, a geostatistical estimation method that accounts for the river network hierarchy. From the runoff time-series, six runoff signatures are extracted: annual runoff, seasonal runoff, flow duration curves, low flows, high flows and runoff hydrographs. The predictive performance is assessed in terms of the bias, error spread and proportion of unexplained spatial variance of statistical measures of these signatures in cross-validation (blind testing) mode. Results of the comparative assessment show that, in Austria, the predictive performance increases with catchment area for both methods and for most signatures, it tends to increase with elevation for the regionalised rainfall–runoff model, while the dependence on climate characteristics is weaker. Annual and seasonal runoff can be predicted more accurately than all other signatures. The spatial variability of high flows in ungauged basins is the most difficult to estimate followed by the low flows. It also turns out that in this data-rich study in Austria, the geostatistical approach (Top-kriging) generally outperforms the regionalised rainfall–runoff model.

[1]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatial prediction on river networks: comparison of top‐kriging with regional regression , 2014 .

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 2: Flood and low flow studies , 2013 .

[4]  J. McDonnell,et al.  A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review , 2013 .

[5]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 1: Runoff-hydrograph studies , 2013 .

[6]  G. Blöschl,et al.  Flood frequency hydrology: 3. A Bayesian analysis , 2013 .

[7]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  An approach to identify time consistent model parameters: sub-period calibration , 2013 .

[8]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures , 2012 .

[9]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Flood timescales: Understanding the interplay of climate and catchment processes through comparative hydrology , 2012 .

[10]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  When are multiobjective calibration trade‐offs in hydrologic models meaningful? , 2012 .

[11]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  A trading-space-for-time approach to probabilistic continuous streamflow predictions in a changing climate – accounting for changing watershed behavior , 2011 .

[12]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Elements of a flexible approach for conceptual hydrological modeling: 1. Motivation and theoretical development , 2011 .

[13]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Convergence of approaches toward reducing uncertainty in predictions in ungauged basins , 2011 .

[14]  P. Claps,et al.  Runoff regime estimation at high-elevation sites: A parsimonious water balance approach , 2011 .

[15]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Climate and catchment controls on the performance of regional flood simulations , 2011 .

[16]  D. Hannah,et al.  Large‐scale river flow archives: importance, current status and future needs , 2011 .

[17]  Murray C. Peel,et al.  A Simple Methodology for Estimating Mean and Variability of Annual Runoff and Reservoir Yield under Present and Future Climates , 2011 .

[18]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Time stability of catchment model parameters: Implications for climate impact analyses , 2011 .

[19]  Alberto Montanari,et al.  Uncertainty of Hydrological Predictions , 2011 .

[20]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Generalised synthesis of space-time variability in flood response An analytical framework , 2010 .

[21]  B. Schaefli,et al.  Signature-based model calibration for hydrological prediction in mesoscale Alpine catchments , 2010 .

[22]  Gordon E. Grant,et al.  Coevolution of hydrology and topography on a basalt landscape in the Oregon Cascade Range, USA , 2010 .

[23]  M. Borga,et al.  Metrics for quantifying space-time dynamics of flood event types , 2010 .

[24]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Climate change impacts—throwing the dice? , 2009 .

[25]  Thibault Mathevet,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Hess Opinions " Crash Tests for a Standardized Evaluation of Hydrological Models " , 2022 .

[26]  J. Parajka,et al.  Scale effects in conceptual hydrological modeling , 2009 .

[27]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Landform – Hydrology Feedbacks , 2009 .

[28]  L. Gottschalk,et al.  Estimating mean monthly runoff at ungauged locations: an application to France , 2008 .

[29]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Flood frequency hydrology: 2. Combining data evidence , 2008 .

[30]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Flood frequency hydrology: 1. Temporal, spatial, and causal expansion of information , 2008 .

[31]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  A spatially distributed flash flood forecasting model , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[32]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Identifying runoff routing parameters for operational flood forecasting in small to medium sized catchments / Identification de paramètres de propagation d'écoulement pour la prévision opérationnelle de crue au sein de bassins versants de petite à moyenne taille , 2008 .

[33]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  National flood discharge mapping in Austria , 2008 .

[34]  G. Blöschl,et al.  Spatiotemporal topological kriging of runoff time series , 2007 .

[35]  G. Blöschl,et al.  A national low flow estimation procedure for Austria , 2007 .

[36]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins , 2007 .

[37]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Do Nash values have value? , 2007 .

[38]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Ensemble prediction of floods – catchment non-linearity and forecast probabilities , 2007 .

[39]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Regional calibration of catchment models: Potential for ungauged catchments , 2007 .

[40]  E. Toth,et al.  Calibration of hydrological models in the spectral domain: An opportunity for scarcely gauged basins? , 2007 .

[41]  Alberto Montanari,et al.  What do we mean by ‘uncertainty’? The need for a consistent wording about uncertainty assessment in hydrology , 2007 .

[42]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Uncertainty and multiple objective calibration in regional water balance modelling: case study in 320 Austrian catchments , 2007 .

[43]  R. Woods,et al.  Catchment Classification and Hydrologic Similarity , 2006, Geography Compass.

[44]  Etienne Leblois,et al.  Mapping mean and variance of runoff in a river basin , 2006 .

[45]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Pattern, Process and Function: Elements of a Unified Theory of Hydrology at the Catchment Scale , 2006 .

[46]  G. Blöschl,et al.  Sampling Scale Effects in Random Fields and Implications for Environmental Monitoring , 2006, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[47]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Hydrologic synthesis: Across processes, places, and scales , 2006 .

[48]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Scale Effects in Estimating the Variogram and Implications for Soil Hydrology , 2006 .

[49]  G. Blöschl,et al.  Top-kriging - geostatistics on stream networks , 2005 .

[50]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters , 2005 .

[51]  Gerd Tetzlaff,et al.  Extreme floods in central Europe over the past 500 years: Role of cyclone pathway ''Zugstrasse Vb'' , 2004 .

[52]  D. Seo,et al.  Overall distributed model intercomparison project results , 2004 .

[53]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): Motivation and experiment design , 2004 .

[54]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Regionalisation of catchment model parameters , 2004 .

[55]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences , 2003 .

[56]  U. Ulbrich,et al.  The central European floods of August 2002: Part 2 –Synoptic causes and considerations with respect to climatic change , 2003 .

[57]  A. Western,et al.  Characteristic space scales and timescales in hydrology , 2003 .

[58]  M. Sivapalan.  Process complexity at hillslope scale, process simplicity at the watershed scale: is there a connection? , 2003 .

[59]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Climate, soil, and vegetation controls upon the variability of water balance in temperate and semiarid landscapes: Downward approach to water balance analysis , 2003 .

[60]  R. Woods,et al.  Climate and landscape controls on water balance model complexity over changing timescales , 2002 .

[61]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Das Katastrophenhochwasser vom 7. August 2002 am Kamp — Eine erste Einschätzung , 2002 .

[62]  T. Meixner.  Spatial Patterns in Catchment Hydrology: Observations and Modelling , 2002 .

[63]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Process controls of water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment: downward approach to hydrological model development , 2001 .

[64]  V. Smakhtin.  Low flow hydrology: a review , 2001 .

[65]  L. Gottschalk,et al.  Mapping average annual runoff: a hierarchical approach applying a stochastic interpolation scheme , 2000 .

[66]  C. Schär,et al.  A PRECIPITATION CLIMATOLOGY OF THE ALPS FROM HIGH-RESOLUTION RAIN-GAUGE OBSERVATIONS , 1998 .

[67]  Renzo Rosso,et al.  Statistics, Probability and Reliability for Civil and Environmental Engineers , 1997 .

[68]  Richard M. Vogel,et al.  Flow duration curves II : a review of applications in water resources planning , 1995 .

[69]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  On the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments , 1995 .

[70]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review , 1995 .

[71]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  ON THE REPRESENTATIVE ELEMENTARY AREA (REA) CONCEPT AND ITS UTILITY FOR DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELLING , 1995 .

[72]  V. Singh,et al.  The HBV model. , 1995 .

[73]  Richard M. Vogel,et al.  Flow‐Duration Curves. I: New Interpretation and Confidence Intervals , 1994 .

[74]  Lars Gottschalk,et al.  Interpolation of runoff applying objective methods , 1993 .

[75]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[76]  Malin Falkenmark,et al.  Comparative Hydrology: An Ecological Approach to Land and Water Resources , 1989 .

[77]  V. Klemeš,et al.  Operational Testing of Hydrological Simulation Models , 2022 .

[78]  B. Efron,et al.  A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and , 1983 .

[79]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[80]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[81]  J. K. Searcy.  Flow-duration curves , 1959 .