This article proposes a framework to address a central conundrum in strategic management: How can firms transcend the trade-off between the momentum that results from the strong strategic commitments needed to gain industry leadership with the need for strategic agility in the face of strategic discontinuities? The article develops an analysis of the meta-capabilities underlying strategic agility, which is clustered around strategic sensitivity (both the sharpness of perception and the intensity of awareness and attention), resource fluidity (the internal capability to reconfigure business systems and redeploy resources rapidly), and leadership unity (the ability of the top team to make bold decisions fast, without getting bogged down in "win-lose" politics at the top). Based on an in-depth study of Nokia9s evolution over the past twenty years, this article shows how these three meta-capabilities interact over time and proposes a framework to enable a firm to maintain and regain strategic agility as it matures.
[1]
J. L. Bower,et al.
Strategy making as iterated processes of resource allocation
,
2007
.
[2]
M. Tushman,et al.
Dynamic Capabilities at IBM: Driving Strategy into Action
,
2007
.
[3]
Michael E. Raynor.
The Strategy Paradox: Why committing to success leads to failure (and what to do about it)
,
2007
.
[4]
Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.
Extracting value from corporate venturing
,
2006
.
[5]
C. Gilbert.
Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity
,
2005
.
[6]
Thomas A. Stewart,et al.
Leading Change When Business Is Good
,
2004
.
[7]
Kathryn Graziano.
The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail
,
1998
.
[8]
Clayton M. Christensen,et al.
CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS
,
1996
.