The development of scientific consensus: Analyzing conflict and concordance among avian phylogenies.

Recent developments in phylogenetic methods and data acquisition have allowed for the construction of large and comprehensive phylogenetic relationships. Published phylogenies represent an enormous resource that not only facilitates the resolution of questions related to comparative biology, but also provides a resource on which to gauge the development of concordance across the tree of life. From the Open Tree of Life, we gathered 290 avian phylogenies representing all major groups that have been published over the last few decades and analyzed how concordance and conflict develop among these trees through time. Nine large scale phylogenetic hypotheses (including a new synthetic tree from this study) were used for comparisons. We found that conflicts were over-represented both along the backbone (higher-level neoavian relationships) and within the oscine Passeriformes. Importantly, although we have made major strides in the resolution of major clades, recent published comprehensive trees, as well as trees of individual clades, continue to contribute significantly to the resolution of relationships throughout the avian phylogeny. Our analyses highlight the need for continued research into the resolution of avian relationships.

[1]  Stephen A. Smith,et al.  Rates of speciation and morphological evolution are correlated across the largest vertebrate radiation , 2013, Nature Communications.

[2]  G. Wong,et al.  Lineage-specific gene radiations underlie the evolution of novel betalain pigmentation in Caryophyllales , 2015, The New phytologist.

[3]  David C. Tank,et al.  Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments , 2013, Nature.

[4]  G. Barrowclough,et al.  Basal divergences in birds and the phylogenetic utility of the nuclear RAG-1 gene. , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[5]  Stephen A. Smith,et al.  Inferring and Postprocessing Huge Phylogenies , 2013 .

[6]  M. Springer,et al.  A Critique of Matrix Representation with Parsimony Supertrees , 2004 .

[7]  D. Richter,et al.  A Large and Consistent Phylogenomic Dataset Supports Sponges as the Sister Group to All Other Animals , 2017, Current Biology.

[8]  B. Livezey,et al.  Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion , 2007, Zoological journal of the Linnean Society.

[9]  J. G. Strauch.  The phylogeny of the Charadriiformes (Aves): a new estimate using the method of character compatibility analysis , 2010 .

[10]  J. Wiens,et al.  Diversification rates and species richness across the Tree of Life , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Alexander Suh.  The phylogenomic forest of bird trees contains a hard polytomy at the root of Neoaves , 2016 .

[12]  D. Mindell,et al.  Strong mitochondrial DNA support for a Cretaceous origin of modern avian lineages , 2008, BMC Biology.

[13]  Md. Shamsuzzoha Bayzid,et al.  Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds , 2014, Science.

[14]  Karen Cranston,et al.  Phylesystem: a git-based data store for community-curated phylogenetic estimates , 2015, Bioinform..

[15]  Travis C. Glenn,et al.  A Phylogeny of Birds Based on Over 1,500 Loci Collected by Target Enrichment and High-Throughput Sequencing , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification , 2014, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  Cody E. Hinchliff,et al.  Some Limitations of Public Sequence Data for Phylogenetic Inference (in Plants) , 2014, PloS one.

[18]  J. G. Burleigh,et al.  Building the avian tree of life using a large-scale, sparse supermatrix. , 2015, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[19]  R. Page,et al.  Reweaving the Tapestry: a Supertree of Birds , 2014, PLoS currents.

[20]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Rates of Molecular Evolution Are Linked to Life History in Flowering Plants , 2008, Science.

[21]  J. Cracraft,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships among modern birds (Neornithes): towards an avian tree of life , 2004 .

[22]  Arlin Stoltzfus,et al.  Sharing and re-use of phylogenetic trees (and associated data) to facilitate synthesis , 2012, BMC Research Notes.

[23]  Arndt von Haeseler,et al.  TreeSnatcher plus: capturing phylogenetic trees from images , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[24]  Stephen A. Smith,et al.  Analysis of phylogenomic datasets reveals conflict, concordance, and gene duplications with examples from animals and plants , 2015, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[26]  W. A. Cox,et al.  A Phylogenomic Study of Birds Reveals Their Evolutionary History , 2008, Science.

[27]  A. Wilson,et al.  Penguin evolution: Protein comparisons demonstrate phylogenetic relationship to flying aquatic birds , 1976, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[28]  E. Braun,et al.  Testing hypotheses about the sister group of the passeriformes using an independent 30-locus data set. , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[29]  Christopher R. Cooney,et al.  Mega-evolutionary dynamics of the adaptive radiation of birds , 2017, Nature.

[30]  T. Parsons,et al.  Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils , 2006, Biology Letters.

[31]  B. Faircloth,et al.  Tectonic collision and uplift of Wallacea triggered the global songbird radiation , 2016, Nature Communications.

[32]  J. Cracraft,et al.  How Many Kinds of Birds Are There and Why Does It Matter? , 2016, PloS one.

[33]  Jeffrey P. Townsend,et al.  A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing , 2016, Nature.

[34]  S. Gupta,et al.  Niche filling slows the diversification of Himalayan songbirds , 2014, Nature.

[35]  J. Ahlquist,et al.  The Birds Reclassified. (Book Reviews: Phylogeny and Classification of Birds. A Study in Molecular Evolution.) , 1991 .

[36]  Benjamin D. Redelings,et al.  A supertree pipeline for summarizing phylogenetic and taxonomic information for millions of species , 2017, PeerJ.

[37]  J. Harshman.  Reweaving the Tapestry: What can We Learn from Sibley and Ahlquist (1990)? , 1994 .

[38]  W. Jetz,et al.  The global diversity of birds in space and time , 2012, Nature.

[39]  J. G. Burleigh,et al.  Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Ning Wang,et al.  Identifying localized biases in large datasets: a case study using the avian tree of life. , 2013, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[41]  A. Meyer,et al.  The seahorse genome and the evolution of its specialized morphology , 2016, Nature.

[42]  S. Lanyon,et al.  New insights into New World biogeography: An integrated view from the phylogeny of blackbirds, cardinals, sparrows, tanagers, warblers, and allies , 2015 .

[43]  H. Ellegren,et al.  The Dynamics of Incomplete Lineage Sorting across the Ancient Adaptive Radiation of Neoavian Birds , 2015, PLoS biology.

[44]  Keith A. Crandall,et al.  Lost Branches on the Tree of Life , 2013, PLoS biology.

[45]  M. Braun,et al.  Why Do Phylogenomic Data Sets Yield Conflicting Trees? Data Type Influences the Avian Tree of Life more than Taxon Sampling , 2017, Systematic biology.

[46]  C. Russo,et al.  A Paleogene origin for crown passerines and the diversification of the Oscines in the New World. , 2015, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.