Imitative behavior: Network antecedents and performance consequences

Organizational networks are generally considered major antecedents of mutual influence in adopting similar practices, typically via a structure of dense ties, or closure. We propose that under conditions of competitive interdependence, closure may be associated with links established to access resources and knowledge and become a possible source of differentiation rather than imitation. We test these and other antecedents of imitative behavior and performance in the Italian TV industry with 12 years of data on 501 productions. We find that network closure is associated with lower imitation, centrality, but not status, leads to imitation, and that imitation lowers performance.

[1]  J. Shaver Testing for Mediating Variables in Management Research: Concerns, Implications, and Alternative Strategies , 2005 .

[2]  Chad R. Mortensen,et al.  Going along versus going alone: when fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  How to Make the Team: Social Networks vs. Demography as Criteria for Designing Effective Teams , 2004 .

[4]  Anne Sigismund Huff,et al.  Industry influences on strategy reformulation , 1982 .

[5]  Howard L. Fromkin,et al.  Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference , 1980 .

[6]  David L. Deephouse To Be Different or to Be the Same? It's a Question (and a Theory) of Strategic Balance , 1998 .

[7]  R. Gulati Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[8]  J. Perry-Smith Social Yet Creative: The Role Of Social Relationships In Facilitating Individual Creativity , 2006 .

[9]  Paul R. Nail,et al.  Proposal of a four-dimensional model of social response. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  The sociology of James S. Coleman , 2005 .

[11]  D. Harrison,et al.  TIES, LEADERS, AND TIME IN TEAMS: STRONG INFERENCE ABOUT NETWORK STRUCTURE'S EFFECTS ON TEAM VIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[12]  H. Ibarra NETWORK CENTRALITY, POWER, AND INNOVATION INVOLVEMENT: DETERMINANTS OF TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ROLES , 1993 .

[13]  L. Burns,et al.  Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. , 1993, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[14]  Denise D. Bielby,et al.  Organizational Mediation of Project-Based Labor Markets: Talent Agencies and the Careers of Screenwriters , 1999, American Sociological Review.

[15]  Charles R. Schwenk Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision‐making , 1984 .

[16]  Ted Mouw,et al.  Estimating the Causal Effect of Social Capital: A Review of Recent Research , 2006 .

[17]  N. Nohria,et al.  Global strategic linkages and industry structure , 1991 .

[18]  I. Janis Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[19]  Tarald O. Kvålseth,et al.  Note on Cohen's Kappa , 1989 .

[20]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[21]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption , 1997 .

[22]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[23]  M. Alicke,et al.  Conformity and Group Size , 1985 .

[24]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  The gloomy side of embeddedness: The effects of overembeddedness on inter-firm partnership formation , 2008 .

[25]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[26]  Colin Seymour-Ure,et al.  Content Analysis in Communication Research. , 1972 .

[27]  J. Sutton,et al.  The Two Faces of Governance: Responses to Legal Uncertainty in U.S. Firms, 1955 to 1985 , 1996 .

[28]  M. Sherif The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[29]  Heather A. Haveman Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[30]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[31]  E P HOLLANDER,et al.  Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. , 1958, Psychological review.

[32]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[33]  S. Duval Conformity on a visual task as a function of personal novelty on attitudinal dimensions and being reminded of the object status of self , 1976 .

[34]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[35]  S. Moscovici Social influence and conformity , 1985 .

[36]  Pamela R. Haunschild Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity , 1993 .

[37]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Speed, Stealth, and Selective Attack: How Small Firms Differ From Large Firms in Competitive Behavior , 1995 .

[38]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[39]  Joel Podolny Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[41]  Joel Podolny A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  H. L. Le Roy,et al.  Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability; Vol. IV , 1969 .

[43]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[44]  F. H. Hankins,et al.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[45]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[46]  M. Argyle Social pressure in public and private situations. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[47]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Why Do Firms Imitate Each Other , 2006 .

[48]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[50]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Dancing with Strangers: Aspiration Performance and the Search for Underwriting Syndicate Partners , 2005 .

[51]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[52]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of organizations , 1996 .

[53]  S. Asch Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[54]  G. Hendrikse Fundamental Issues in Strategy , 1995 .

[55]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Where Do Small Worlds Come From? , 2003 .

[56]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[57]  R. Crutchfield Conformity and character. , 1955 .

[58]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  A Positivist Alternative to the Structure-Action Approach , 1997 .

[59]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[60]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: a Structural Embeddedness Perspective , 2001 .

[61]  A. Huff,et al.  STRATEGIC GROUPS: A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE , 1993 .

[62]  T. Parsons Equality and Inequality in Modern Society, or Social Stratification Revisited , 1970 .

[63]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[64]  C. Maslach,et al.  Individuation: Conceptual analysis and assessment. , 1985 .

[65]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty , 1997 .

[66]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Memory: The Influence of Past and Current Networks on Performance , 2004 .

[67]  A. Portes,et al.  Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[68]  C. Oliver SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[69]  R. Baumeister,et al.  What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: comment on Cross and Madson (1997) , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[70]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979 , 1985 .

[71]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[72]  P. J. Huber The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[73]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[74]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. , 1990 .

[75]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  The Pressure of the Past: Network Imprinting in Intercorporate Communities , 2003 .

[76]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[77]  W. Shan,et al.  Country—specific advantage and international cooperation , 1991 .

[78]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[79]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[80]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[81]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[82]  D. Teece,et al.  Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda , 1994 .

[83]  M. Porter What is strategy , 2000 .

[84]  John E. Prescott,et al.  Bringing the firm back in: Networking as antecedent to network structure , 2008 .

[85]  Christopher Barnatt,et al.  Beyond Networks and Hierarchies: Latent Organizations in the U.K. Television Industry , 2000 .

[86]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  The Social Capital of French and American Managers , 2000 .

[87]  Barry Wellman,et al.  It's about time: how, why, and when networks change , 1997 .

[88]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Mimetic Processes within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test , 1989 .

[89]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[90]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[91]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[92]  J. Hausman Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[93]  R. H. Willis,et al.  Two Dimensions of Conformity-Nonconformity , 1963 .

[94]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[95]  Judd Harrison Michael,et al.  Demographic antecedents and performance consequences of structural holes in work teams , 2007 .

[96]  Joel Podolny,et al.  Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry , 1999 .