Recruiting a Probability Sample for an Online Panel Effects of Contact Mode, Incentives, and Information

[1]  F. Muñoz-Leiva,et al.  An analysis of the effect of pre-incentives and post-incentives based on draws on response to web surveys , 2010 .

[2]  D. Petrolia,et al.  Revisiting Incentive Effects Evidence From A Random-Sample Mail Survey on Consumer Preferences for Fuel Ethanol , 2009 .

[3]  S. Blumberg,et al.  Reevaluating the need for concern regarding noncoverage bias in landline surveys. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[4]  Robert D. Tortora,et al.  Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet , 2009 .

[5]  Peter Lynn,et al.  Methodology of longitudinal surveys , 2009 .

[6]  Mario Callegaro,et al.  Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels , 2008 .

[7]  J. Zagorsky,et al.  The Effects of Promised Monetary Incentives on Attrition in a Long-Term Panel Survey , 2008 .

[8]  Michael E. Whitcomb,et al.  Mixed-Mode Contacts In Web Surveys Paper is Not Necessarily Better , 2007 .

[9]  Edith D. de Leeuw,et al.  The Influence of Advance Letters on Response in Telephone Surveys A Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[10]  J. Saunders,et al.  The optimum prepaid monetary incentives for mail surveys , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Mick P. Couper,et al.  Survey Incentives: Cash vs. In-Kind; Face-to-Face vs. Mail; Response Rate vs. Nonresponse Error , 2006 .

[12]  P. Lavrakas,et al.  The Influence of Incremental Increases in Token Cash Incentives on Mail Survey Response Is There an Optimal Amount , 2004 .

[13]  Anja S. Göritz,et al.  The impact of material incentives on response quantity, response quality, sample composition, survey outcome, and cost in online access panels , 2004 .

[14]  A. Scherpenzeel,et al.  Encouraging and Maintaining Participation in Household Surveys: The Case of the Swiss Household Panel , 2004 .

[15]  E. Singer,et al.  Experiments with incentives in telephone surveys. , 2000, Public opinion quarterly.

[16]  M. Couper.  A REVIEW OF ISSUES AND APPROACHES , 2000 .

[17]  E. Singer,et al.  Differential Incentives: Beliefs about Practices, Perceptions of Equity, and Effects on Survey Participation , 1999 .

[18]  Patrick Bonnel,et al.  The quality of survey data: Telephone versus face-to-face interviews , 1998 .

[19]  Alan Tse,et al.  Comparing Response Rate, Response Speed and Response Quality of Two Methods of Sending Questionnaires: E-mail vs. Mail , 1998 .

[20]  Peter Lynn,et al.  Assessing the Effects of an Advance Letter for a Personal Interview , 1998 .

[21]  W. Hueston,et al.  Mixed-mode survey of female veterinarians yields high response rate. , 1997, Occupational medicine.

[22]  Kathleen Mcspurren,et al.  CHARITIES, NO; LOTTERIES, NO; CASH, YES MAIN EFFECTS AND INTERACTIONS IN A CANADIAN INCENTIVES EXPERIMENT , 1996 .

[23]  A. H. Church.  ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES: A META-ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[24]  Robert M. Groves,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN A SURVEY , 1992 .

[25]  Joseph A. Bellizzi,et al.  Face-to-face advance contact and monetary incentives effects on mail survey return rates, response differences, and survey costs , 1986 .