Urine Peptidome Analysis Identifies Common and Stage-Specific Markers in Early Versus Advanced CKD

Given the pathophysiological continuum of chronic kidney disease (CKD), different molecular determinants affecting progression may be associated with distinct disease phases; thus, identification of these players are crucial for guiding therapeutic decisions, ideally in a non-invasive, repeatable setting. Analyzing the urinary peptidome has been proven an efficient method for biomarker determination in CKD, among other diseases. In this work, after applying several selection criteria, urine samples from 317 early (stage 2) and advanced (stage 3b–5) CKD patients were analyzed using capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry (CE-MS). The entire two groups were initially compared to highlight the respective pathophysiology between initial and late disease phases. Subsequently, slow and fast progressors were compared within each group in an attempt to distinguish phase-specific disease progression molecules. The early vs. late-stage CKD comparison revealed 929 significantly different peptides, most of which were downregulated and 268 with collagen origins. When comparing slow vs. fast progressors in early stage CKD, 42 peptides were significantly altered, 30 of which were collagen peptide fragments. This association suggests the development of structural changes may be reversible at an early stage. The study confirms previous findings, based on its multivariable-matched progression groups derived from a large initial cohort. However, only four peptide fragments differed between slow vs. fast progressors in late-stage CKD, indicating different pathogenic processes occur in fast and slow progressors in different stages of CKD. The defined peptides associated with CKD progression at early stage might potentially constitute a non-invasive approach to improve patient management by guiding (personalized) intervention.

[1]  M. Kanehisa,et al.  KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes , 2022, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  C. Kovesdy Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: an update 2022. , 2022, Kidney international supplements.

[3]  A. Vlahou,et al.  Urine peptidome in combination with transcriptomics analysis highlights MMP7, MMP14 and PCSK5 for further investigation in chronic kidney disease , 2022, PloS one.

[4]  H. Mischak,et al.  Reproducibility Evaluation of Urinary Peptide Detection Using CE-MS , 2021, Molecules.

[5]  A. Vlahou,et al.  Urinary peptidomic profiles to address age-related disabilities: a prospective population study , 2021, The Lancet. Healthy longevity.

[6]  A. Vlahou,et al.  Urine peptidome analysis in cardiorenal syndrome reflects molecular processes , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[7]  D. Fliser,et al.  Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease , 2021, Circulation.

[8]  M. Rudnicki,et al.  Urine proteomics for prediction of disease progression in patients with IgA nephropathy , 2020, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[9]  E. Schleicher,et al.  Urinary fetuin-A peptides as a new marker for impaired kidney function in patients with type 2 diabetes , 2020, Clinical kidney journal.

[10]  G. Nijpels,et al.  Early detection of diabetic kidney disease by urinary proteomics and subsequent intervention with spironolactone to delay progression (PRIORITY): a prospective observational study and embedded randomised placebo-controlled trial. , 2020, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[11]  L. G. Vu,et al.  Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 , 2020, The Lancet.

[12]  R. Serra,et al.  The Association of Matrix Metalloproteinases with Chronic Kidney Disease and Peripheral Vascular Disease: A Light at the End of the Tunnel? , 2020, Biomolecules.

[13]  Minoru Kanehisa,et al.  Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms , 2019, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[14]  A. Dornhorst,et al.  Insulin sensitivity assessed using urine C peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) in pregnancy: cross-sectional analysis of an English multiethnic cohort , 2018, BMJ Open.

[15]  H. Schnaper The Tubulointerstitial Pathophysiology of Progressive Kidney Disease. , 2017, Advances in chronic kidney disease.

[16]  H. Parving,et al.  Urinary proteomics predict onset of microalbuminuria in normoalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients, a sub-study of the DIRECT-Protect 2 study , 2016, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[17]  A. Vlahou,et al.  A urinary proteome‐based classifier for the early detection of decline in glomerular filtration , 2016, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[18]  H. Mischak,et al.  Proteomics for prediction of disease progression and response to therapy in diabetic kidney disease , 2016, Diabetologia.

[19]  A. Garg,et al.  Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review , 2015, The Lancet.

[20]  M. Tonelli,et al.  Cause of Death in Patients with Reduced Kidney Function. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[21]  A. Vlahou,et al.  Diagnosis and Prediction of CKD Progression by Assessment of Urinary Peptides. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[22]  C. Zoccali,et al.  Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) as a Systemic Disease: Whole Body Autoregulation and Inter-Organ Cross-Talk , 2014, Kidney and Blood Pressure Research.

[23]  Robert Stevens,et al.  Proteasix: A tool for automated and large‐scale prediction of proteases involved in naturally occurring peptide generation , 2013, Proteomics.

[24]  Chapter 1: Definition and classification of CKD , 2012, Kidney International Supplements.

[25]  J. Staessen,et al.  Urinary proteome analysis in hypertensive patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. , 2012, European heart journal.

[26]  A. Köttgen,et al.  Association of apolipoprotein A1 and B with kidney function and chronic kidney disease in two multiethnic population samples. , 2012, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[27]  Gary King,et al.  MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference , 2011 .

[28]  M. Girolami,et al.  Naturally Occurring Human Urinary Peptides for Use in Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[29]  Martin Norling,et al.  Comprehensive human urine standards for comparability and standardization in clinical proteome analysis , 2010, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[30]  C. Schmid,et al.  A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[31]  J. Hokanson,et al.  Adults with type 1 diabetes eat a high-fat atherogenic diet that is associated with coronary artery calcium , 2009, Diabetologia.

[32]  M. Chonchol,et al.  Nontraditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology.

[33]  H. Mischak,et al.  Biomarker discovery by CE‐MS enables sequence analysis via MS/MS with platform‐independent separation , 2006, Electrophoresis.

[34]  E. Lewis,et al.  Sulodexide fails to demonstrate renoprotection in overt type 2 diabetic nephropathy. , 2012, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[35]  H. Mischak,et al.  Quantitative urinary proteome analysis for biomarker evaluation in chronic kidney disease. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[36]  Susumu Goto,et al.  KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..