Student Experiences Reporting Sexual and Gender-Based Misconduct to the Title IX Office at a Public State University.

Twenty-five survivors completed anonymous surveys about reporting sexual and gender-based misconduct to their public university's Title IX office, including case characteristics, perceptions of the reporting and response process (e.g., helpfulness, respect), and experiences of institutional betrayal and support. Measures and open-ended responses described varied misconduct incidents, reporting behaviors, case outcomes, process issues, and negative process consequences. Additionally, process perceptions correlated with institutional betrayal and support. Findings illuminate how survivors' Title IX process perceptions relate to experiencing harm or support from larger institutions, and offer insights into developing a Title IX process which maintains student rights and dignity regardless of outcome.

[1]  Kathryn J. Holland,et al.  Does a report = support? A qualitative analysis of college sexual assault survivors’ Title IX Office knowledge, perceptions, and experiences , 2021, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy.

[2]  Kathryn J. Holland,et al.  The Selective Shield of Due Process: Analysis of the U.S. Department of Education's 2020 Title IX Regulations on Live Cross‐Examination , 2020, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy.

[3]  C. Murphy,et al.  How can psychology help reduce gender-based violence and misconduct on college campuses? , 2020, The American psychologist.

[4]  Jacqueline Cruz The Constraints of Fear and Neutrality in Title IX Administrators’ Responses to Sexual Violence , 2020 .

[5]  Kathryn J. Holland Correlates of college women’s intentions to use formal campus supports for sexual assault. , 2020 .

[6]  L. Fedina,et al.  College student perceptions of institutional responses to sexual assault reporting and general help-seeking intentions , 2020, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[7]  Tara N. Richards No Evidence of “Weaponized Title IX” Here: An Empirical Assessment of Sexual Misconduct Reporting, Case Processing, and Outcomes , 2019, Law and human behavior.

[8]  Alec M Smidt,et al.  Out and in Harm’s Way: Sexual Minority Students’ Psychological and Physical Health after Institutional Betrayal and Sexual Assault , 2019, Journal of child sexual abuse.

[9]  J. Hirsch,et al.  "I Didn't Want To Be 'That Girl'": The Social Risks of Labeling, Telling, and Reporting Sexual Assault , 2018 .

[10]  C. E. Fleming,et al.  Resource Use After Unwanted Sexual Experiences in Undergraduates: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Factors Related to the Decision to Seek Help , 2018, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[11]  J. Freyd,et al.  Compelled Disclosure of College Sexual Assault , 2018, The American psychologist.

[12]  L. Fedina,et al.  Campus Sexual Assault: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Research From 2000 to 2015 , 2018, Trauma, violence & abuse.

[13]  A. Rutherford Surveying rape , 2017 .

[14]  J. Freyd,et al.  Sexual violence, institutional betrayal, and psychological outcomes for LGB college students. , 2016 .

[15]  Jennifer J. Freyd,et al.  Still Second Class , 2016 .

[16]  J. Freyd,et al.  Dangerous safe havens: institutional betrayal exacerbates sexual trauma. , 2013, Journal of traumatic stress.

[17]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[18]  J. Freyd,et al.  Institutional betrayal. , 2014, The American psychologist.