Optimal commands based multi-stage drag de-orbit design for a tethered system during large space debris removal

Abstract There is a serious challenge to the safe operation of orbiting satellites as the number of space debris increases for its high risks and the possible crippling effects of collisions. Consequently, the active removal scenario of space debris has drawn wide attention in recent years, and a tethered system is considered to be a promising method for its large operating distance and low power consumption. However, the flexible tether of the system will bring the coupling of the orbit motion, the sway motion and the variation of large debris attitude, which brings about great danger in de-orbiting phase and a huge challenge in later control. Hence, aiming to de-orbit large space debris safely with a tethered system, a multi-stage horizontal drag de-orbit strategy that consists of two stages is designed. At the first stage, the orbit altitude is rose with a tug thrust whose direction is consistent with the tether, which does not provoke the in-plane oscillation of the tethered system. At the second stage, the orbit is circularized by changing the size and direction of the tug thrust. Especially, optimal commands based on the minimum of tangling risks are planned using Gauss pseudospectral method to avoid target tangling and achieve decoupling of the orbit motion, the sway motion and the variation of the target attitude. Then, the stable attitude control of the tethered system is achieved by designing a hybrid fuzzy adaptive proportion differentiation (PD) with hierarchical sliding-mode controller (HSMC) in the de-orbit process. Finally, numerical simulation is implemented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed de-orbit design.

[1]  Zhongyi Chu,et al.  Inertial parameter identification using contact force information for an unknown object captured by a space manipulator , 2017 .

[2]  Zhongyi Chu,et al.  Hybrid tension control method for tethered satellite systems during large tumbling space debris removal , 2018, Acta Astronautica.

[3]  Zhongyi Chu,et al.  Analysis of the effect of attachment point bias during large space debris removal using a tethered space tug , 2017 .

[4]  Saburo Matunaga,et al.  Formation and Attitude Control for Rotational Tethered Satellite Clusters , 2007 .

[5]  J.-C. Liou,et al.  A sensitivity study of the effectiveness of active debris removal in LEO , 2009 .

[6]  S. Flegel,et al.  Active debris removal of multiple priority targets , 2013 .

[7]  Haiyan Hu,et al.  Optimal feedback control of the deployment of a tethered subsatellite subject to perturbations , 2008 .

[8]  Eberhard Gill,et al.  Review and comparison of active space debris capturing and removal methods , 2016 .

[9]  Naigang Cui,et al.  Dynamics of Robotic GEostationary orbit Restorer system during deorbiting , 2014, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[10]  Haiyan Hu,et al.  Constrained tension control of a tethered space-tug system with only length measurement , 2016 .

[11]  Dennis S. Bernstein,et al.  Gravity-gradient-stabilized spacecraft attitude estimation using rate-gyroscope measurements , 2016, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[12]  Rui Zhong,et al.  Timescale Separate Optimal Control of Tethered Space-Tug Systems for Space-Debris Removal , 2016 .

[13]  Paul Williams,et al.  Deployment/retrieval optimization for flexible tethered satellite systems , 2008 .

[14]  Michèle Lavagna,et al.  Dynamics analysis and GNC design of flexible systems for space debris active removal , 2015 .

[15]  Zhang Jing-rui,et al.  Space Tether Net System for Debris Capture and Removal , 2012, 2012 4th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics.

[16]  Francesco Branz,et al.  Active space debris removal by hybrid engine module , 2012 .

[17]  Panfeng Huang,et al.  A space tethered towing method using tension and platform thrusts , 2017 .

[18]  Tiago Soares,et al.  The e.Deorbit CDF Study: A Design Study for the Safe Removal of a Large Space Debris , 2013 .

[19]  Lorenzo Olivieri,et al.  Study of dynamical stability of tethered systems during space tug maneuvers , 2017 .

[20]  Vladimir S. Aslanov,et al.  Chaos Behavior of Space Debris During Tethered Tow , 2016 .

[21]  K. Nock,et al.  Removing Orbital Debris with Less Risk , 2013 .

[22]  Guo Yanning,et al.  Orbit maneuver for GEO on-orbit service satellite using Hohmann transfer , 2017, 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC).

[23]  Hai Huang,et al.  Stability and control of tethered satellite with chemical propulsion in orbital plane , 2013 .