Genomic prediction in biparental tropical maize populations in water-stressed and well-watered environments using low-density and GBS SNPs

One of the most important applications of genomic selection in maize breeding is to predict and identify the best untested lines from biparental populations, when the training and validation sets are derived from the same cross. Nineteen tropical maize biparental populations evaluated in multienvironment trials were used in this study to assess prediction accuracy of different quantitative traits using low-density (~200 markers) and genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), respectively. An extension of the Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor that incorporates genotype × environment (GE) interaction was used to predict genotypic values; cross-validation methods were applied to quantify prediction accuracy. Our results showed that: (1) low-density SNPs (~200 markers) were largely sufficient to get good prediction in biparental maize populations for simple traits with moderate-to-high heritability, but GBS outperformed low-density SNPs for complex traits and simple traits evaluated under stress conditions with low-to-moderate heritability; (2) heritability and genetic architecture of target traits affected prediction performance, prediction accuracy of complex traits (grain yield) were consistently lower than those of simple traits (anthesis date and plant height) and prediction accuracy under stress conditions was consistently lower and more variable than under well-watered conditions for all the target traits because of their poor heritability under stress conditions; and (3) the prediction accuracy of GE models was found to be superior to that of non-GE models for complex traits and marginal for simple traits.

[1]  J Crossa,et al.  Genomic prediction in CIMMYT maize and wheat breeding programs , 2013, Heredity.

[2]  Robenzon E. Lorenzana,et al.  Genomewide predictions from maize single-cross data , 2012, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[3]  Robert J. Elshire,et al.  Switchgrass Genomic Diversity, Ploidy, and Evolution: Novel Insights from a Network-Based SNP Discovery Protocol , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[4]  José Crossa,et al.  A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[5]  José Crossa,et al.  Genomic Selection in Wheat Breeding using Genotyping‐by‐Sequencing , 2012 .

[6]  J. Ogutu,et al.  Genomic Selection using Multiple Populations , 2012 .

[7]  M. Calus,et al.  Whole-Genome Regression and Prediction Methods Applied to Plant and Animal Breeding , 2013, Genetics.

[8]  William H Briggs,et al.  Accuracy of Across-Environment Genome-Wide Prediction in Maize Nested Association Mapping Populations , 2013, G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics.

[9]  Jean-Luc Jannink,et al.  Genomic Predictability of Interconnected Biparental Maize Populations , 2013, Genetics.

[10]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[11]  M. Sorrells,et al.  Plant Breeding with Genomic Selection: Gain per Unit Time and Cost , 2010 .

[12]  J. Poland,et al.  Development of High-Density Genetic Maps for Barley and Wheat Using a Novel Two-Enzyme Genotyping-by-Sequencing Approach , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  M. Stitt,et al.  Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[14]  G. de los Campos,et al.  Genomic Selection and Prediction in Plant Breeding , 2011 .

[15]  R. Varshney,et al.  Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement , 2017, Springer International Publishing.

[16]  R. Bernardo,et al.  Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize , 2007 .

[17]  Robert J. Elshire,et al.  A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  Deniz Akdemir,et al.  Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[19]  Hansang Jung,et al.  Genomewide Selection versus Marker‐assisted Recurrent Selection to Improve Grain Yield and Stover‐quality Traits for Cellulosic Ethanol in Maize , 2013 .

[20]  José Crossa,et al.  Predicting Quantitative Traits With Regression Models for Dense Molecular Markers and Pedigree , 2009, Genetics.

[21]  Robert J. Elshire,et al.  Comprehensive genotyping of the USA national maize inbred seed bank , 2013, Genome Biology.

[22]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  Robenzon E. Lorenzana,et al.  Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations , 2009, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[24]  José Crossa,et al.  Genomic Prediction of Breeding Values when Modeling Genotype × Environment Interaction using Pedigree and Dense Molecular Markers , 2012 .

[25]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[26]  Robert J. Elshire,et al.  TASSEL-GBS: A High Capacity Genotyping by Sequencing Analysis Pipeline , 2014, PloS one.

[27]  José Crossa,et al.  Genomic Prediction in Maize Breeding Populations with Genotyping-by-Sequencing , 2013, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[28]  P M VanRaden,et al.  Genomic measures of relationship and inbreeding , 2007 .

[29]  Jose Crossa,et al.  Effectiveness of Genomic Prediction of Maize Hybrid Performance in Different Breeding Populations and Environments , 2012, G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics.

[30]  José Crossa,et al.  Prediction of Genetic Values of Quantitative Traits in Plant Breeding Using Pedigree and Molecular Markers , 2010, Genetics.

[31]  R. Bernardo,et al.  Genomewide Prediction Accuracy within 969 Maize Biparental Populations , 2014 .

[32]  J Crossa,et al.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits with epistatic effects in plant breeding populations , 2012, Heredity.

[33]  Henner Simianer,et al.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize , 2011, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.