TBCRC 048: Phase II Study of Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer and Mutations in Homologous Recombination-Related Genes.

PURPOSE Olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (PARPi), is approved for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in germline (g)BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Olaparib Expanded, an investigator-initiated, phase II study, assessed olaparib response in patients with MBC with somatic (s)BRCA1/2 mutations or g/s mutations in homologous recombination (HR)-related genes other than BRCA1/2. METHODS Eligible patients had MBC with measurable disease and germline mutations in non-BRCA1/2 HR-related genes (cohort 1) or somatic mutations in these genes or BRCA1/2 (cohort 2). Prior PARPi, platinum-refractory disease, or progression on more than two chemotherapy regimens (metastatic setting) was not allowed. Patients received olaparib 300 mg orally twice a day until progression. A single-arm, two-stage design was used. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); the null hypothesis (≤ 5% ORR) would be rejected within each cohort if there were four or more responses in 27 patients. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Fifty-four patients enrolled. Seventy-six percent had estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative disease. Eighty-seven percent had mutations in PALB2, sBRCA1/2, ATM, or CHEK2. In cohort 1, ORR was 33% (90% CI, 19% to 51%) and in cohort 2, 31% (90% CI, 15% to 49%). Confirmed responses were seen only with gPALB2 (ORR, 82%) and sBRCA1/2 (ORR, 50%) mutations. Median PFS was 13.3 months (90% CI, 12 months to not available/computable [NA]) for gPALB2 and 6.3 months (90% CI, 4.4 months to NA) for sBRCA1/2 mutation carriers. No responses were observed with ATM or CHEK2 mutations alone. CONCLUSION PARP inhibition is an effective treatment for patients with MBC and gPALB2 or sBRCA1/2 mutations, significantly expanding the population of patients with breast cancer likely to benefit from PARPi beyond gBRCA1/2 mutation carriers. These results emphasize the value of molecular characterization for treatment decisions in MBC.

[1]  B. Jackson,et al.  Novo Nordisk , 2021 .

[2]  B. Alter,et al.  Frequency of heterozygous germline pathogenic variants in genes for Fanconi anemia in patients with non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer: a meta-analysis , 2020, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  G. Shapiro,et al.  Biomarker-Guided Development of DNA Repair Inhibitors. , 2020, Molecular cell.

[4]  F. Saad,et al.  Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  F. Feng,et al.  Non-BRCA DNA Damage Repair Gene Alterations and Response to the PARP Inhibitor Rucaparib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Analysis From the Phase II TRITON2 Study , 2020, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  K. Hess,et al.  Neoadjuvant Talazoparib for Patients With Operable Breast Cancer With a Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variant. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Julie O. Culver,et al.  Cancer Risks Associated With Germline PALB2 Pathogenic Variants: An International Study of 524 Families. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  N. Tunariu,et al.  Olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations (TOPARP-B): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  E. Winer,et al.  Reversion and non-reversion mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitor or platinum chemotherapy in BRCA1/2-mutant metastatic breast cancer , 2019, bioRxiv.

[10]  E. Antonarakis,et al.  Differential Response to Olaparib Treatment Among Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 Versus ATM Mutations. , 2019, European urology.

[11]  A. Mcmillan,et al.  Talazoparib beyond BRCA: A phase II trial of talazoparib monotherapy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 wild-type patients with advanced HER2-negative breast cancer or other solid tumors with a mutation in homologous recombination (HR) pathway genes. , 2019, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Rakesh R. Patel,et al.  Underdiagnosis of Hereditary Breast Cancer: Are Genetic Testing Guidelines a Tool or an Obstacle? , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  C. Caldas,et al.  A RAD51 assay feasible in routine tumor samples calls PARP inhibitor response beyond BRCA mutation , 2018, EMBO molecular medicine.

[14]  W. Eiermann,et al.  Talazoparib in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer and a Germline BRCA Mutation , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  P. Kristel,et al.  RAD51 foci as a functional biomarker of homologous recombination repair and PARP inhibitor resistance in germline BRCA-mutated breast cancer , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  E. Lander,et al.  A mutational signature reveals alterations underlying deficient homologous recombination repair in breast cancer , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[17]  E. Birney,et al.  HRDetect is a predictor of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency based on mutational signatures , 2017, Nature Medicine.

[18]  M. Robson,et al.  Olaparib for Metastatic Germline BRCA-Mutated Breast Cancer. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Anne Floquet,et al.  Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[20]  L. Saal,et al.  Targeted sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 across a large unselected breast cancer cohort suggests that one-third of mutations are somatic , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[21]  L. Wernisch,et al.  An optimal stratified Simon two‐stage design , 2016, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[22]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  BRCAness revisited , 2016, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[23]  Wei Yuan,et al.  DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  P. Ang,et al.  Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  Genome-wide profiling of genetic synthetic lethality identifies CDK12 as a novel determinant of PARP1/2 inhibitor sensitivity. , 2014, Cancer research.

[26]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2013 .

[27]  Päivi Heikkilä,et al.  Pathology of Breast and Ovarian Cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) , 2011, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[28]  Jernej Ule,et al.  The Cyclin K/Cdk12 complex maintains genomic stability via regulation of expression of DNA damage response genes. , 2011, Genes & development.

[29]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Efficacy of neoadjuvant Cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  Alice S Whittemore,et al.  Prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1 mutation carriers in 5 US racial/ethnic groups. , 2007, JAMA.

[31]  E. Holmgren,et al.  An adaptive Simon Two-Stage Design for Phase 2 studies of targeted therapies. , 2007, Contemporary clinical trials.

[32]  Giske Ursin,et al.  Prevalence and predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based study of breast cancer in white and black American women ages 35 to 64 years. , 2006, Cancer research.

[33]  R. Simon,et al.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[34]  E. Atkinson,et al.  Confidence limits for probability of response in multistage phase II clinical trials. , 1985, Biometrics.