Longitudinal clinical evaluation of post systems: a literature review.

In this survey, retrospective and prospective clinical studies dealing with cast-post-and core and fiber posts were reviewed regarding the rate of survival of restorations and the most prevalent failures. Electronic searches of the literature were performed in MEDLINE by crossing the key words: "Fiber post and clinical study", "Fiber post and clinical evaluation", "Cast post-and-core and clinical study", and "Root post and retrospective survival study". The cut-off dates were December 1990 through the end of December 2010. Review of literature showed that several interrelated biological, mechanical, and aesthetic factors are involved in the survival rate of restorative procedures in endodontically treated teeth, and post selection should fulfill and optimize these factors. Data based on long-term clinical studies are essential for the general practitioner when making clinical decisions. An adequate selection of teeth and post system must be made, and a minimal amount of existing tooth substance should be removed. A ferrule must be present for safe indication of the fiber posts. Fiber glass posts have demonstrated good survival in clinical studies, with similar performance to cast-post-and cores. Metallic posts have good clinical survival, but the associated failures are mostly irreversible, unlike what happens with the glass fiber posts.

[1]  C. Kreulen,et al.  5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations , 2005 .

[2]  F. García-Godoy,et al.  Clinical studies of fiber posts: a literature review. , 2008, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[3]  M. Balkenhol,et al.  Survival time of cast post and cores: a 10-year retrospective study. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  B. Glazer Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts--a prospective study. , 2000, Journal.

[5]  Charles J Goodacre,et al.  Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  B. Bergman,et al.  Four post-and-core combinations as abutments for fixed single crowns: a prospective up to 10-year study. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[7]  N. Lang,et al.  Clinical evaluation of root filled teeth restored with or without post-and-core systems in a specialist practice setting. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[8]  F. Tay,et al.  Clinical performance of fiber post restorations in endodontically treated teeth: 2-year results. , 2007, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[9]  M. Schmitter,et al.  Influence of clinical baseline findings on the survival of 2 post systems: a randomized clinical trial. , 2007, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[10]  F. Tay,et al.  Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. , 2007, American journal of dentistry.

[11]  H. Meyer-Lueckel,et al.  Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. , 2009, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  F. Demarco,et al.  Survival rates of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced custom posts and cores: a 97-month study. , 2007, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[13]  Richard S Schwartz,et al.  Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  T. Dietrich,et al.  Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years-an observational clinical study. , 2005, Journal of dentistry.

[15]  J. Rees,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a carbon fibre reinforced carbon endodontic post. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[16]  C. Kreulen,et al.  Up to 17-year controlled clinical study on post-and-cores and covering crowns. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  J. Schirrmeister,et al.  Survival of glass fiber post restorations over 5 years. , 2008, American journal of dentistry.

[18]  F. Tay,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth. , 2005, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[19]  C. Goracci,et al.  Clinical behavior of translucent-fiber posts: a 2-year prospective study. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[20]  F. García-Godoy,et al.  Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. , 2000, American journal of dentistry.

[21]  A. Torbjörner,et al.  A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[22]  Arezoo Hasanpour Kashani,et al.  بررسی مجدد فرول: روش جدید یا روش مشکل قدیمیRethinking ferrule – a new approach to an old dilemma , 2012 .

[23]  T. Dietrich,et al.  Randomized controlled clinical pilot trial of titanium vs. glass fiber prefabricated posts: preliminary results after up to 3 years. , 2007, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[24]  R. Scotti,et al.  Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[25]  S. Mehta,et al.  A comparison of the survival of fibre posts cemented with two different composite resin systems , 2008, BDJ.

[26]  W. Saunders,et al.  Fibre-based post systems: a review , 2003, British Dental Journal.

[27]  H. Worthington,et al.  Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results. , 2005, Operative dentistry.

[28]  G. Heydecke,et al.  The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: a systematic review. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[29]  N. Tsingos,et al.  A 3-year postoperative clinical evaluation of posts and cores beneath existing crowns. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[30]  Miguel Gómez-Polo,et al.  A 10-year retrospective study of the survival rate of teeth restored with metal prefabricated posts versus cast metal posts and cores. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[31]  R. Jung,et al.  A comparison of composite post buildups and cast gold post-and-core buildups for the restoration of nonvital teeth after 5 to 10 years. , 2007, The International journal of prosthodontics.