System and Actor Perspectives on Sociotechnical Systems

This paper addresses the complexity of analyzing and designing sociotechnical systems: systems that involve both complex physical-technical systems and networks of interdependent actors. It is shown that, although a hard system perspective and an actor perspective differ greatly in terms of terminology, methods, and applicability, they also show surprisingly many similarities. By building upon the similarities and differences of the two dominant perspectives, this paper then goes on to show that the modeling and intervention possibilities in both perspectives differ to a great extent. The emerging systems-of-systems discipline generally calls for an ldquointegrationrdquo of both perspectives in order to model and design these complex sociotechnical systems, but in this paper, it is argued and shown that full integration is not the preferred way to go. Instead, the emerging discipline should strive to facilitate the use of both perspectives alongside each other in a sensible way and, thereby, not discard the strengths of either perspective.

[1]  J. Bohman Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy , 1996 .

[2]  G. Teisman MODELS FOR RESEARCH INTO DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES : ON PHASES , STREAMS AND DECISION-MAKING , 2000 .

[3]  Paulien M. Herder,et al.  Designing infrastructures using a complex systems perspective , 2008 .

[4]  H. De Bruijn,et al.  Process Management: Why Project Management Fails in Complex Decision Making Processes , 2005 .

[5]  M. Bjelkemyr,et al.  An Engineering Systems Perspective on System of Systems Methodology , 2007, 2007 1st Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[6]  Gnana Bharathy,et al.  Sociocultural Games for Training and Analysis , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[7]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  On the Systems Engineering and Management of Systems of Systems and Federations of Systems , 2001, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[8]  Alois Stutzer,et al.  Introducing Procedural Utility: Not Only What, But Also How Matters , 2002 .

[9]  Daniel DeLaurentis,et al.  A System-of-Systems Perspective for Public Policy Decisions , 2004 .

[10]  Mark Exworthy,et al.  Big Windows and Little Windows: Implementation in the ‘Congested State’ , 2004 .

[11]  M. Callon The role of hybrid communities and socio-technical arrangements in the participatory design , 2004 .

[12]  Daniel Grosu,et al.  Antisocial Behavior of Agents in Scheduling Mechanisms , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[13]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[14]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks , 1999 .

[15]  Eberhardt Rechtin,et al.  The art of systems architecting (2nd ed.) , 2000 .

[16]  E. Elliott Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers , 1983 .

[17]  Robert Agranoff,et al.  Managing within Networks: Adding Value to Public Organizations , 2007 .

[18]  T. Webler,et al.  What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public , 2001, Environmental management.

[19]  Geert Teisman,et al.  Models For Research into Decision-MakingProcesses: On Phases, Streams and Decision-Making Rounds , 2000 .

[20]  Ivo Wenzler,et al.  Guest editorial: Utilities deregulation and simulation , 2005 .

[21]  Christopher W. Johnson,et al.  What are emergent properties and how do they affect the engineering of complex systems? , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Ivo Wenzler,et al.  Deregulation of utility industries and roles of simulation , 2005 .

[23]  Madara Ogot,et al.  Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction , 2004 .

[24]  T. Webler,et al.  Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action , 2001 .

[25]  Stephen J. Lukasik,et al.  Systems, systems of systems, and the education of engineers , 1998, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[26]  G. Rabadi,et al.  System of systems engineering , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[27]  Ken Eason,et al.  Local sociotechnical system development in the NHS National Programme for Information Technology , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[28]  Wolter J. Fabrycky,et al.  Systems engineering and analysis , 1981 .

[29]  Charles E. Lindblom,et al.  The intelligence of democracy : decision making through mutual adjustment , 1965 .

[30]  T. R. Featheringham,et al.  On systemic problem solving and the error of the third kind , 1974 .

[31]  A. Todd Rivetti Beyond rational management, by Robert E. Quinn, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 1988, 199 pp. , 1990 .

[32]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Strategies for intergovernmental management:implementing programs in interorganizational networks , 1988 .

[33]  E. Rechtin,et al.  The art of systems architecting , 1996, IEEE Spectrum.

[34]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  An Evaluation of the Pugh Controlled Convergence Method , 2007 .

[35]  Richard Stuart Neville,et al.  Applying Evolutionary Computing to Complex Systems Design , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[36]  Michael McGuire,et al.  Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do It , 2002 .

[37]  R. Jewett,et al.  Systems Engineering , 1959, IRE Transactions on Military Electronics.

[38]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[39]  Vlatko Čerić,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict , 1991 .

[40]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Managing Uncertainties in Networks: Public Private Controversies , 2004 .

[41]  Peter Kroes Technical Artifacts, Engineering Practice, and Emergence , 2009 .

[42]  J. March Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[43]  Hans de Bruijn,et al.  Managing Performance in the Public Sector , 2002 .

[44]  Adam L. Turk,et al.  Challenges for process systems engineering in infrastructure design , 2000 .

[45]  Paulien M. Herder,et al.  Methanol-Based Industrial Cluster Design: A Study of Design Options and the Design Process , 2004 .

[46]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[47]  D. Chisholm,et al.  COORDINATION WITHOUT HIERARCHY: EXAMINING THE DYNAMICS OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR , 1989 .

[48]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[49]  David Boddy,et al.  Organizations in the Network Age , 1995 .

[50]  R. Mayntz,et al.  Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence And Theoretical Considerations , 1991 .

[51]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[52]  B. Jones BOUNDED RATIONALITY , 1999 .

[53]  Tanja A. Börzel,et al.  Organizing Babylon ‐ On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks , 1998 .

[54]  L. O'toole Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration , 1997 .

[55]  J. A. de Bruijn,et al.  Management in Networks: On multi-actor decision making , 2008 .