Nonstationarities of regional climate model biases in European seasonal mean temperature and precipitation sums

Bias correcting climate models implicitly assumes stationarity of the correction function. This assumption is assessed for regional climate models in a pseudo reality for seasonal mean temperature and precipitation sums. An ensemble of regional climate models for Europe is used, all driven with the same transient boundary conditions. Although this model-dependent approach does not assess all possible bias non-stationarities, conclusions can be drawn for the real world. Generally, biases are relatively stable, and bias correction on average improves climate scenarios. For winter temperature, bias changes occur in the Alps and ice covered oceans caused by a biased forcing sensitivity of surface albedo; for summer temperature, bias changes occur due to a biased sensitivity of cloud cover and soil moisture. Precipitation correction is generally successful, but affected by internal variability in arid climates. As model sensitivities vary considerably in some regions, multi model ensembles are needed even after bias correction. Key Points: - Bias correction in general improves future climate simulations - Cloud cover, soil moisture and albedo changes may cause temperature bias changes - Precipitation biases in arid regions are affected by internal variability

[1]  P. Linden,et al.  ENSEMBLES: Climate Change and its Impacts - Summary of research and results from the ENSEMBLES project , 2009 .

[2]  M. Déqué,et al.  Frequency of precipitation and temperature extremes over France in an anthropogenic scenario: Model results and statistical correction according to observed values , 2007 .

[3]  W. Deursen,et al.  Estimates of future discharges of the river Rhine using two scenario methodologies: direct versus delta approach , 2007 .

[4]  E. Wood,et al.  Bias correction of monthly precipitation and temperature fields from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 models using equidistant quantile matching , 2010 .

[5]  Eduardo Zorita,et al.  Testing statistical downscaling methods in simulated climates , 2006 .

[6]  H. Storch,et al.  Regional climate models add value to global model data, A Review and Selected Examples , 2011 .

[7]  D. Maraun,et al.  Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user , 2010 .

[8]  Katharine Hayhoe,et al.  A general method for validating statistical downscaling methods under future climate change , 2007 .

[9]  C. Piani,et al.  Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe , 2010 .

[10]  J. Christensen,et al.  On the need for bias correction of regional climate change projections of temperature and precipitation , 2008 .

[11]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Validation of Mesoscale Precipitation in the NCEP Reanalysis Using a New Gridcell Dataset for the Northwestern United States , 2000 .