Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models

[1]  D. Layton,et al.  From Ratings to Rankings: The Econometric Analysis of Stated Preference Ratings Data , 2006 .

[2]  Alan Krupnick,et al.  Valuation of Natural Resource Improvements in the Adirondacks , 2006, Land Economics.

[3]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Revealing Differences in Willingness to Pay due to the Dimensionality of Stated Choice Designs: An Initial Assessment , 2006 .

[4]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Bounded Distributions of Correlated Partworths , 2005 .

[5]  Elisabetta Strazzera,et al.  Modeling Elicitation effects in contingent valuation studies: a Monte Carlo Analysis of the bivariate approach , 2005 .

[6]  J. Herriges,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences: Consistency Tests and Their Interpretations , 2003 .

[7]  P. Boxall,et al.  Valuing aboriginal artifacts: A combined revealed-stated preference approach , 2003 .

[8]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The Mixed Logit Model: the State of Practice and Warnings for the Unwary , 2001 .

[9]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same? , 2002 .

[10]  Susana Mourato,et al.  Testing for Consistency in Contingent Ranking Experiments , 2002 .

[11]  J. R. DeShazo,et al.  Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency , 2002 .

[12]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation , 2002 .

[13]  J. R. DeShazo,et al.  Designing Transactions without Framing Effects in Iterative Question Formats , 2002 .

[14]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  A Comparison of Conjoint Analysis Response Formats , 2001 .

[15]  K. Train.  A Comparison of Hierarchical Bayes and Maximum Simulated Likelihood for Mixed Logit , 2001 .

[16]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and developing Countries , 2001 .

[17]  David F. Layton,et al.  Heterogeneous Preferences Regarding Global Climate Change , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[18]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[19]  Bente Halvorsen.  Comparing Ranking and Contingent Valuation for Valuing Human Lives, Applying Nested and Non-Nested Logit Models , 2000 .

[20]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[21]  David F. Layton,et al.  Random Coefficient Models for Stated Preference Surveys , 2000 .

[22]  Cleve E. Willis,et al.  Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis in ecosystem management , 2000 .

[23]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? A comment , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Combining sources of preference data , 1998 .

[25]  K. Train,et al.  Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns , 1998 .

[26]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[27]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach , 1998 .

[28]  S. Cosslett,et al.  Environmental Quality Preference and Benefit Estimation in Multinomial Probit Models: A Simulation Approach , 1998 .

[29]  K. Train.  Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People , 1998 .

[30]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Willingness to pay for quality improvements: should revealed and stated preference data be combined? , 1997 .

[31]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[32]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data , 1997 .

[33]  C. Kling.  Evaluation of the Gains from Combining Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Data to Value Nonmarket Goods (An) , 1997 .

[34]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation , 1996 .

[35]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DISCRETE-RESPONSE CV DATA , 1996 .

[36]  Jason F. Shogren,et al.  Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning , 1996 .

[37]  J. Louviere,et al.  Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation , 1998 .

[38]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .

[39]  Glenn C. Blomquist,et al.  Contingent Valuation When Respondents Are Ambivalent , 1995 .

[40]  John Quiggin,et al.  Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-Up Questionnaire , 1994 .

[41]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  The equalization price: A measure of consumer-perceived brand equity , 1993 .

[42]  J. Louviere,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities , 1994 .

[43]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Combining Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Data for the Valuation of Nonmarket Goods , 1992 .

[44]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Analysis of the reliability of preference ranking data , 1991 .

[45]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1991 .

[46]  R. Pollak,et al.  The likelihood dominance criterion: A new approach to model selection , 1991 .

[47]  Joel Huber,et al.  Paired comparison and contingent valuation approaches to morbidity risk valuation , 1988 .

[48]  William H. Desvousges,et al.  Option price estimates for water quality improvements: A contingent valuation study for the monongahela river , 1987 .

[49]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[50]  Jerry A. Hausman and Paul A. Ruud.,et al.  Specifying and Testing Econometric Models for Rank-ordered Data with an Application to the Demand for Mobile and Portable Telephones , 1986 .

[51]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[52]  Randall G. Chapaaan,et al.  Exploiting Rank Ordered Choice Set Data within the Stochastic Utility Model , 1982 .

[53]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Assessing the potential demand for electric cars , 1981 .

[54]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[55]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. , 1949, Biometrika.